• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“仅仅考虑最终结果意味着我们的参与一直都是徒劳的”:坦桑尼亚艾滋病毒疫苗试验中的利益界定。

"By only considering the end product it means that our participation has always been in vain": Defining benefits in HIV vaccine trials in Tanzania.

出版信息

Dev World Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(3):220-228. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12359. Epub 2022 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1111/dewb.12359
PMID:35708989
Abstract

Debates about what constitutes benefits in human research continue to be less informed due to a lack of empirical evidence from the developing world. This study aimed to explore what constitutes benefits in HIV vaccine trials in Tanzania and examine inherent ethical implications. A qualitative case study design was deployed and a total of 29 purposively selected study participants comprising of experienced researchers, institutional review board members and community advisory board members were included. Collected data were analyzed by thematic analysis aided by computer software: MAXQDA version 20.4.0. The study findings indicate that there is a growing appreciation of benefits beyond actual vaccines to include 1) capacity building at individual, community, institutional and regulatory levels; and 2) non-capacity building related benefits such as strengthened collaborations, ancillary care and employment opportunities. So, as the struggle for viable HIV vaccines continues, other benefits that have accrued from such trials are not to be blindsided especially for developing countries like Tanzania.

摘要

由于发展中国家缺乏实证证据,有关人类研究中何为受益的争论仍然知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨在坦桑尼亚的艾滋病毒疫苗试验中何为受益,并审视其中固有的伦理含义。采用了定性案例研究设计,总共纳入了 29 名经过精心挑选的研究参与者,包括有经验的研究人员、机构审查委员会成员和社区咨询委员会成员。通过计算机软件 MAXQDA 版本 20.4.0 对收集到的数据进行了主题分析。研究结果表明,人们越来越认识到受益不仅仅是实际疫苗,还包括 1)个人、社区、机构和监管层面的能力建设;和 2)与能力建设无关的受益,如加强合作、辅助护理和就业机会。因此,随着对可行的艾滋病毒疫苗的持续努力,特别是对于像坦桑尼亚这样的发展中国家来说,不应忽视从这些试验中获得的其他受益。

相似文献

1
"By only considering the end product it means that our participation has always been in vain": Defining benefits in HIV vaccine trials in Tanzania.“仅仅考虑最终结果意味着我们的参与一直都是徒劳的”:坦桑尼亚艾滋病毒疫苗试验中的利益界定。
Dev World Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(3):220-228. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12359. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
2
Can HIV vaccines be shared fairly? Perspectives from Tanzania.艾滋病毒疫苗能否公平共享?来自坦桑尼亚的观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec 15;23(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00874-w.
3
Who to engage in HIV vaccine trial benefit-sharing negotiations? An empirical proposition of a framework.谁应参与 HIV 疫苗试验的利益共享谈判?一个框架的实证建议。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 14;25(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01058-4.
4
Should HIV Vaccines Be Made Available at No or Subsidized Cost? A Qualitative Inquiry of HIV Vaccine Trial Stakeholders in Tanzania.是否应该免费或补贴提供 HIV 疫苗?坦桑尼亚 HIV 疫苗试验利益相关者的定性研究。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024 Jul-Sep;15(3):206-213. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2274599. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
5
The role of community advisory boards in community-based HIV clinical trials: a qualitative study from Tanzania.社区咨询委员会在社区为基础的艾滋病毒临床试验中的作用:来自坦桑尼亚的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jan 8;23(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00737-w.
6
Perception of potential harm and benefits of HIV vaccine trial participation: A qualitative study from urban Tanzania.艾滋病毒疫苗试验参与的潜在危害和益处感知:来自坦桑尼亚城市的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 8;14(11):e0224831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224831. eCollection 2019.
7
Comprehension of informed consent and voluntary participation in registration cohorts for phase IIb HIV vaccine trial in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania: a qualitative descriptive study.在坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆进行的 IIb 期 HIV 疫苗试验注册队列中,知情同意和自愿参与的理解:一项定性描述性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Mar 13;25(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01033-z.
8
Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.美国机构审查委员会和南非研究伦理委员会成员对HIV疫苗试验伦理审查过程和内容的看法。
Dev World Bioeth. 2008 Dec;8(3):207-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2007.00189.x.
9
Gender aspects on HIV prevention efforts and participation in HIV vaccine trials among Police officers in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆的警察在预防 HIV 工作和参与 HIV 疫苗试验方面的性别问题。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 21;18(1):905. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5835-5.
10
Balancing collective responsibility, individual opportunities and risks: a qualitative study on how police officers reason around volunteering in an HIV vaccine trial in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.平衡集体责任、个人机会和风险:坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆一项关于警察在 HIV 疫苗试验中自愿参与的理由的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2010 May 28;10:292. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-292.

引用本文的文献

1
Descriptions of risks and benefits of HIV vaccine trials in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs): an integrative review.低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)中HIV疫苗试验的风险与益处描述:一项综合综述
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 3;26(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01235-z.
2
Who to engage in HIV vaccine trial benefit-sharing negotiations? An empirical proposition of a framework.谁应参与 HIV 疫苗试验的利益共享谈判?一个框架的实证建议。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 14;25(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01058-4.
3
Should HIV Vaccines Be Made Available at No or Subsidized Cost? A Qualitative Inquiry of HIV Vaccine Trial Stakeholders in Tanzania.
是否应该免费或补贴提供 HIV 疫苗?坦桑尼亚 HIV 疫苗试验利益相关者的定性研究。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024 Jul-Sep;15(3):206-213. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2274599. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
4
Can HIV vaccines be shared fairly? Perspectives from Tanzania.艾滋病毒疫苗能否公平共享?来自坦桑尼亚的观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec 15;23(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00874-w.