• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于后天神经损伤的人来说,什么样的生活才有意义?一个范围综述方案。

What is a meaningful life for persons with acquired neurological impairments? A scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Knowledge Centre for Neurorehabilitation of Western Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark.

Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Denmark, Neurology, Central Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jun 16;17(6):e0269125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269125. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0269125
PMID:35709200
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9202831/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review explores the constitution of a meaningful life as perceived by adults with acquired neurological impairment following an injury or a disease.

INTRODUCTION

A neurological injury or disease imposes extensive life changes on the affected person and his or her close relatives. Including the patients' perception of a meaningful life is crucial to facilitate adjustment of any rehabilitation initiatives to the patients' wishes, hopes, needs, and preferences. Even so, the descriptions and common traits of a meaningful life from the impaired person's perspective are scarcely covered in the literature. Hence, a scoping review of existing knowledge is needed to facilitate quality rehabilitation and research initiatives.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

All studies, regardless of their design, are included provided they describe a meaningful life as considered or experienced by persons aged 18 years or more with neurological impairment.

METHODS

A PICo framework defines the search algorithms used in the databases MEDLINE, Cinahl, PsycINFO and Embase. Using Covidence, the scoping review systematically organizes the identified articles to provide a broad description of the study phenomenon. Furthermore, titles, abstracts, and full-text articles are screened independently by two reviewers to determine if they meet the inclusion criteria. In case of disagreement, a third and fourth reviewer are consulted. The scoping will be reported according to the PRISMA- SCR checklist.

摘要

目的

本范围综述探讨了成人在因损伤或疾病而导致的获得性神经损伤后对有意义生活的理解。

介绍

神经损伤或疾病会给受影响者及其直系亲属的生活带来广泛的变化。将患者对有意义生活的感知纳入其中对于促进任何康复措施的调整以满足患者的愿望、希望、需求和偏好至关重要。即便如此,从受损者的角度描述和概括有意义生活的特征在文献中仍鲜有涉及。因此,需要对现有知识进行范围综述,以促进高质量的康复和研究举措。

纳入标准

无论设计如何,只要描述了年龄在 18 岁或以上的神经损伤患者所认为或体验到的有意义的生活,所有研究均被纳入。

方法

PICo 框架定义了在 MEDLINE、Cinahl、PsycINFO 和 Embase 数据库中使用的搜索算法。使用 Covidence,范围综述系统地组织了已识别的文章,以提供对研究现象的广泛描述。此外,标题、摘要和全文文章由两名评审员独立筛选,以确定它们是否符合纳入标准。如果存在分歧,将咨询第三和第四位评审员。本综述将根据 PRISMA-SCR 清单进行报告。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b04e/9202831/9ce11525b65b/pone.0269125.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b04e/9202831/9ce11525b65b/pone.0269125.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b04e/9202831/9ce11525b65b/pone.0269125.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
What is a meaningful life for persons with acquired neurological impairments? A scoping review protocol.对于后天神经损伤的人来说,什么样的生活才有意义?一个范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 16;17(6):e0269125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269125. eCollection 2022.
2
A meaningful everyday life experienced by adults with acquired neurological impairments: A scoping review.成年人获得性神经损伤后的有意义日常生活:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 25;18(10):e0286928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286928. eCollection 2023.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Facilitators and barriers of relatives' involvement in nursing care decisions and self-care of patients with acquired brain injury or malignant brain tumour: A scoping review protocol.亲属参与颅脑损伤或恶性脑肿瘤患者护理决策和自我护理的促进因素和障碍:系统评价方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 18;17(8):e0273151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273151. eCollection 2022.
6
Co-designing with adults with acquired neurological disability in the community: a scoping review protocol.与社区中获得性神经残疾的成年人共同设计:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 8;12(12):e064921. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064921.
7
Loneliness in pregnant and postpartum people and parents of children aged 5 years or younger: a scoping review protocol.孕期及产后人群以及5岁及以下儿童家长的孤独感:一项范围综述方案
Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 14;9(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01469-5.
8
Person-centred rehabilitation: what exactly does it mean? Protocol for a scoping review with thematic analysis towards framing the concept and practice of person-centred rehabilitation.以患者为中心的康复:究竟意味着什么?一项范围综述的方案,采用主题分析法来界定以患者为中心的康复的概念与实践。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 19;6(7):e011959. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011959.
9
Protocol for a scoping review on rehabilitation among individuals who experience homelessness and traumatic brain injury.针对经历无家可归和创伤性脑损伤的个体的康复的范围综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 5;11(11):e052942. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052942.
10
Characteristics of activity-based therapy interventions for people living with spinal cord injury or disease across the continuum of care: a scoping review protocol.基于活动的治疗干预对脊髓损伤或疾病患者在连续护理过程中的特征:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 23;10(7):e040014. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040014.

引用本文的文献

1
A meaningful everyday life experienced by adults with acquired neurological impairments: A scoping review.成年人获得性神经损伤后的有意义日常生活:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 25;18(10):e0286928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286928. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Toward a new definition of rehabilitation for research purposes: a comparative analysis of current definitions.为研究目的制定新的康复定义:对当前定义的比较分析。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Oct;56(5):672-681. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06610-1. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
2
Experiences with and perspectives on goal setting in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies.脊髓损伤康复中目标设定的经验和观点:定性研究的系统评价。
Spinal Cord. 2020 Sep;58(9):949-958. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-0485-8. Epub 2020 May 18.
3
Finding the Way Forward: The Lived Experience of People With Stroke After Participation in a Complex Psychosocial Intervention.
寻找前进的道路:参与复杂心理社会干预后脑卒中患者的生活体验。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Oct;29(12):1711-1724. doi: 10.1177/1049732319833366. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
4
Getting back to life after stroke: co-designing a peer-led coaching intervention to enable stroke survivors to rebuild a meaningful life after stroke.中风后重返生活:共同设计以同伴为指导的辅导干预措施,使中风幸存者能够在中风后重建有意义的生活。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 May;42(10):1359-1372. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1524521. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
5
Quality of life after stroke: impact of clinical and sociodemographic factors.中风后的生活质量:临床和社会人口学因素的影响
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018 Oct 8;73:e418. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2017/e418.
6
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
7
Patient participation from the perspective of staff members working in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.脊髓损伤康复工作人员视角下的患者参与度
Spinal Cord. 2018 Jun;56(6):614-620. doi: 10.1038/s41393-018-0061-7. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
8
What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences.我应该进行什么样的系统评价?医学和健康科学系统评价者的建议分类法和指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jan 10;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4.
9
The experience of attempting to return to work following spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the qualitative literature.脊髓损伤后尝试重返工作岗位的经历:对定性文献的系统综述
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Jul;40(15):1745-1753. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1312566. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
10
Patients' views on their decision making during inpatient rehabilitation after newly acquired spinal cord injury-A qualitative interview-based study.新获得性脊髓损伤后住院康复期间患者对其决策的看法:一项基于定性访谈的研究。
Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):1133-1142. doi: 10.1111/hex.12559. Epub 2017 Mar 24.