Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助肺叶切除术中使用血管封闭系统进行肺叶间裂分离。

Interlobar division using vessel-sealing system in robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy.

作者信息

Miyajima Masahiro, Shindo Yuma, Tsuruta Kodai, Nakamura Yasuyuki, Takase Yoshiaki, Aoyagi Miho, Watanabe Atsushi

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.

出版信息

JTCVS Tech. 2022 Feb 21;13:211-216. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.02.019. eCollection 2022 Jun.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the safety of a novel interlobar fissure division technique using the da Vinci vessel sealing system in robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy.

METHODS

The medical records of patients who underwent robotic pulmonary lobectomy with node dissection for primary lung cancer between 2018 and 2020 were reviewed. The inclusion criteria were fulfilled by 111 patients, whose perioperative factors and postoperative results were compared with those previously reported. Furthermore, the new robotic lung interlobar division technique using the da Vinci vessel sealing system without a robotic stapler was evaluated in patients with low-grade incomplete fissure. We considered the Craig and Walker classification of lung fissures grades 1 and 2 as a good adaptation for the vessel sealing system interlobar fissure division.

RESULTS

The vessel sealing system group had shorter mean operative and console times ( = .03 and  = .01, respectively) and lesser median intraoperative blood loss (20 mL vs 50 mL;  = .01). The vessel sealing system group had lower surgical complication rates (2.2% vs 20.0%;  = .01). The incidence of persistent postoperative air leak was lower (0% vs 10.0%;  = .06), and fewer robotic stapler cartridges were used during surgery (3.4 vs 5.6;  < .001) in the vessel sealing system group than in the stapler group.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the safety of using the da Vinci vessel sealing system as an alternative to the use of robotic staples for interlobar fissure division in robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy. This technique seems easy and feasible though limited to the low-grade incomplete fissure.

摘要

目的

我们研究了在机器人辅助肺叶切除术中使用达芬奇血管闭合系统进行新型叶间裂分割技术的安全性。

方法

回顾了2018年至2020年间因原发性肺癌接受机器人辅助肺叶切除并进行淋巴结清扫的患者的病历。111名患者符合纳入标准,将他们的围手术期因素和术后结果与先前报道的进行比较。此外,在低级别不完全叶裂的患者中评估了使用达芬奇血管闭合系统而不使用机器人吻合器的新型机器人肺叶间分割技术。我们认为克雷格和沃克肺裂分级1级和2级非常适合血管闭合系统叶间裂分割。

结果

血管闭合系统组的平均手术时间和控制台操作时间较短(分别为P = 0.03和P = 0.01),术中中位失血量较少(20毫升对50毫升;P = 0.01)。血管闭合系统组的手术并发症发生率较低(2.2%对20.0%;P = 0.01)。血管闭合系统组术后持续性漏气的发生率较低(0%对10.0%;P = 0.06),并且手术期间使用的机器人吻合器钉仓较少(3.4个对5.6个;P < 0.001)。

结论

我们报告了在机器人辅助肺叶切除术中使用达芬奇血管闭合系统替代机器人吻合器进行叶间裂分割的安全性。尽管该技术仅限于低级别不完全叶裂,但似乎简单可行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f45/9196317/85488d17981e/fx1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验