• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导下乳腺肿块微创切除术:乳腺病变切除系统的单中心五年经验。

Minimally Invasive Excision of Breast Masses under Ultrasound Guidance: A Single Center's Five-Year Experience on the Breast Lesion Excision System.

机构信息

University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Department of Radiology, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Breast J. 2022 Feb 4;2022:1888726. doi: 10.1155/2022/1888726. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/1888726
PMID:35711894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9187288/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of the percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) excision system (BLES) as a primary method of diagnosis and removal of small breast masses.

METHODS

Ninety-six lesions in 95 patients with 50.5 ± 8.4 years of age were treated in a five-year period by a single operator. Inclusion criteria were as follows: size (<20 mm), depth (>10 mm), and indeterminate or suspicious radiological features (74 BI-RADS 3 and 22 BI-RADS 4). The procedure was performed under ultrasound (US) guidance using 6 G retriever probes with 12-, 15-, and 20-mm baskets.

RESULTS

Lesions were between 5 and 20 (12.3 ± 3.8) mm in length. They were removed at the first attempt in all but one case. The technical success rate was 98.95%, and the diagnostic success rate was 100%. Ninety-one lesions were histologically benign and five were neoplastic. Two lesions that were previously classified as BI-RADS 3 were diagnosed as neoplasia (atypical lobular hyperplasia), and nineteen lesions that were previously classified as BI-RADS 4a were diagnosed as benign. The complete excision rate (presence of tumor-free negative surgical margin) was 40% in neoplastic lesions. There were no major complications. The minor complication rate was 1.58%. No recurrence was observed during 18 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

BLES delivers surgical quality specimens for confident histopathological examination and is a safe alternative to surgical resection in lesions with suitable size.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨经皮射频(RF)切除术系统(BLES)作为诊断和切除小乳腺肿块的主要方法的可行性。

方法

在五年期间,由一名外科医生对 95 名患者的 96 个病灶进行了治疗,这些患者的年龄为 50.5±8.4 岁。纳入标准为:大小(<20mm)、深度(>10mm)以及不确定或可疑的影像学特征(74 个 BI-RADS 3 和 22 个 BI-RADS 4)。该过程在超声(US)引导下进行,使用 6G 取物探针和 12、15 和 20mm 的篮子。

结果

病灶长度为 5-20(12.3±3.8)mm。除了一个病例外,所有病例均在首次尝试时被切除。技术成功率为 98.95%,诊断成功率为 100%。91 个病灶为组织学良性,5 个为肿瘤性。两个先前被归类为 BI-RADS 3 的病灶被诊断为肿瘤(不典型小叶增生),19 个先前被归类为 BI-RADS 4a 的病灶被诊断为良性。肿瘤性病变的完全切除率(无肿瘤阴性切缘)为 40%。无重大并发症。小并发症发生率为 1.58%。在 18 个月的随访期间未观察到复发。

结论

BLES 提供了用于进行有信心的组织病理学检查的外科质量标本,并且是适合大小的病变的安全替代手术切除方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f81/9187288/e3dee70eb21c/TBJ2022-1888726.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f81/9187288/1e400250deff/TBJ2022-1888726.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f81/9187288/707dafc47634/TBJ2022-1888726.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f81/9187288/c0e0069764de/TBJ2022-1888726.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f81/9187288/a5f8d4df8ca4/TBJ2022-1888726.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f81/9187288/740936832cec/TBJ2022-1888726.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f81/9187288/eb4e8358d980/TBJ2022-1888726.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f81/9187288/e3dee70eb21c/TBJ2022-1888726.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f81/9187288/1e400250deff/TBJ2022-1888726.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f81/9187288/707dafc47634/TBJ2022-1888726.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f81/9187288/c0e0069764de/TBJ2022-1888726.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f81/9187288/a5f8d4df8ca4/TBJ2022-1888726.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f81/9187288/740936832cec/TBJ2022-1888726.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f81/9187288/eb4e8358d980/TBJ2022-1888726.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f81/9187288/e3dee70eb21c/TBJ2022-1888726.007.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimally Invasive Excision of Breast Masses under Ultrasound Guidance: A Single Center's Five-Year Experience on the Breast Lesion Excision System.超声引导下乳腺肿块微创切除术:乳腺病变切除系统的单中心五年经验。
Breast J. 2022 Feb 4;2022:1888726. doi: 10.1155/2022/1888726. eCollection 2022.
2
Effectiveness of the diagnostic pathway of BLES: could it be safely used as a therapeutic method in selected benign lesions?BLES 诊断路径的有效性:在选择的良性病变中,可否安全地将其用作治疗方法?
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019 Nov;25(6):428-434. doi: 10.5152/dir.2019.18427.
3
Role of one-pass breast lesion excision system in complete excision of high-risk breast lesions with atypia expressed as clusters of microcalcifications.一次性乳腺病灶切除系统在完全切除伴有簇状微钙化异型表达的高危乳腺病变中的作用。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Jun;29(6):3149-3158. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5925-x. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
4
Breast lesion excision sample (BLES biopsy) combining stereotactic biopsy and radiofrequency: is it a safe and accurate procedure in case of BIRADS 4 and 5 breast lesions?乳腺病变切除样本(BLES 活检)结合立体定向活检和射频:在 BI-RADS 4 和 5 类乳腺病变的情况下,这是一种安全且准确的操作吗?
Breast J. 2013 Nov-Dec;19(6):590-4. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12184. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
5
The radiological excision of high risk and malignant lesions using the INTACT breast lesion excision system. A case series with an imaging follow up of at least 5 years.使用 INTACT 乳房病变切除系统切除高危和恶性病变的放射学切除。至少进行了 5 年影像学随访的病例系列。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul;40(7):824-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
6
Surgical excision for B3 breast lesions diagnosed by vacuum-assisted core biopsy.真空辅助核心活检诊断为 B3 型乳腺病变的手术切除。
Anticancer Res. 2010 Jun;30(6):2287-90.
7
The breast lesion excision system procedure: An optimal solution for the management of indeterminate BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions in women with severe anxiety.乳腺病变切除系统手术:针对重度焦虑女性中不确定的BI-RADS 3类乳腺病变管理的最佳解决方案。
Saudi Med J. 2018 Sep;39(9):891-896. doi: 10.15537/smj.2018.9.22573.
8
Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy.经皮乳腺粗针活检的临床管理问题
Radiol Clin North Am. 2000 Jul;38(4):791-807. doi: 10.1016/s0033-8389(05)70201-3.
9
Minimally invasive breast cancer excision using the breast lesion excision system under ultrasound guidance.在超声引导下使用乳腺病变切除系统进行微创乳腺癌切除术。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Nov;184(1):37-43. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05814-z. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
10
Diagnostic performance of ultrasound strain elastography for differentiation of malignant breast lesions.超声应变弹性成像对乳腺恶性病变的诊断效能
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2019;71(2):237-247. doi: 10.3233/CH-189415.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-inferiority of minimally invasive rotational cutting in granulomatous mastitis treatment: a comparative trial.微创旋转切割术治疗肉芽肿性乳腺炎的非劣效性:一项对照试验
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 3;15(1):728. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79778-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally invasive breast cancer excision using the breast lesion excision system under ultrasound guidance.在超声引导下使用乳腺病变切除系统进行微创乳腺癌切除术。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Nov;184(1):37-43. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05814-z. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
2
Effectiveness of the diagnostic pathway of BLES: could it be safely used as a therapeutic method in selected benign lesions?BLES 诊断路径的有效性:在选择的良性病变中,可否安全地将其用作治疗方法?
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019 Nov;25(6):428-434. doi: 10.5152/dir.2019.18427.
3
A systematic review on the use of the breast lesion excision system in breast disease.
关于乳腺病变切除系统在乳腺疾病中应用的系统评价。
Insights Imaging. 2019 May 2;10(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0737-3.
4
Re-excision Rates and Local Recurrence in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Breast Conserving Therapy.接受保乳治疗的乳腺癌患者的再次切除率和局部复发情况
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2012 Nov;72(11):1018-1023. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1327980.
5
Radiofrequency-assisted intact specimen biopsy of breast tumors: critical evaluation according to the IDEAL recommendations.射频辅助完整标本活检乳腺肿瘤:根据 IDEAL 建议的批判性评估。
Cancer Imaging. 2011 Dec 28;11(1):247-52. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2011.0034.
6
Definitive diagnosis for high-risk breast lesions without open surgical excision: the Intact Percutaneous Excision Trial (IPET).对于无开放性外科切除的高危乳腺病变的明确诊断:完整经皮切除术试验(IPET)。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(11):3047-52. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1911-0. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
7
The breast lesion excision system (BLES): a novel technique in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of small indeterminate breast lesions?乳腺病变切除术系统(BLES):一种用于诊断和治疗小的不确定乳腺病变的新方法?
Eur Radiol. 2011 May;21(5):919-24. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-2000-7. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
8
Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.浸润性乳腺癌术前诊断或切除活检后,临床及病理变量与乳房肿瘤切除术手术切缘状态的相关性
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Mar;14(3):1040-4. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9308-1. Epub 2007 Jan 4.
9
Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of a vacuum-assisted percutaneous intact specimen sampling device to a vacuum-assisted core needle sampling device for breast biopsy: initial experience.真空辅助经皮完整标本采样装置与真空辅助芯针采样装置用于乳腺活检的诊断准确性比较:初步经验
Breast J. 2006 Jul-Aug;12(4):302-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00268.x.
10
Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer.筛查与辅助治疗对乳腺癌死亡率的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27;353(17):1784-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050518.