Fievet L, Serratrice N, Brulin B, Giraudo L, Véran J, Degardin N, Sabatier F, Féron F, Layrolle P
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Régional Henri Duffaut, Avignon, France.
Department of Neurosurgery, La Timone Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France.
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022 May 30;10:913539. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.913539. eCollection 2022.
Bone repair induced by stem cells and biomaterials may represent an alternative to autologous bone grafting. Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs), easily accessible in every human, are prototypical cells that can be tested, alone or with a biomaterial, for creating new osteoblasts. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of two biomaterials-biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) and bioactive glass (BG)-when loaded with either adult bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) or newborn nasal ecto-mesenchymal stem cells (NE-MSCs), the latter being collected for further repair of lip cleft-associated bone loss. BMMSCs were collected from two adults and NE-MSCs from two newborn infants. An study was performed in order to determine the best experimental conditions for adhesion, viability, proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation on BCP or BG granules. Bone-associated morphological changes and gene expression modifications were quantified using histological and molecular techniques. The study was based on the subcutaneous implantation in nude mice of the biomaterials, loaded or not with one of the two cell types. Eight weeks after, bone formation was assessed using histological and electron microscopy techniques. Both cell types-BMMSC and NE-MSC-display the typical stem cell surface markers-CD73+, CD90+, CD105+, nestin - and exhibit the MSC-associated osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic multipotency. NE-MSCs produce less collagen and alkaline phosphatase than BMMSCs. At the transcript level, NE-MSCs express more abundantly three genes coding for bone sialoprotein, osteocalcin and osteopontin while BMMSCs produce extra copies of RunX2. BMMSCs and NE-MSCs adhere and survive on BCP and BG. experiments reveal that bone formation is only observed with BMMSCs transplanted on BCP biomaterial. Although belonging to the same superfamily of mesenchymal stem cells, BMMSCs and NE-MSCs exhibit striking differences, and . For future clinical applications, the association of BMMSCs with BCP biomaterial seems to be the most promising.
干细胞和生物材料诱导的骨修复可能是自体骨移植的一种替代方法。间充质基质/干细胞(MSC)在每个人体内都易于获取,是一类典型细胞,可单独或与生物材料一起用于测试以生成新的成骨细胞。本研究的目的是比较两种生物材料——双相磷酸钙(BCP)和生物活性玻璃(BG)——在负载成人骨髓间充质干细胞(BMMSC)或新生鼻外胚间充质干细胞(NE-MSC)时的效率,后者是为唇裂相关骨质流失的进一步修复而收集的。BMMSC从两名成年人中采集,NE-MSC从两名新生儿中采集。进行了一项研究以确定在BCP或BG颗粒上进行黏附、活力、增殖和成骨细胞分化的最佳实验条件。使用组织学和分子技术对与骨相关的形态变化和基因表达修饰进行定量。该研究基于将负载或未负载两种细胞类型之一的生物材料皮下植入裸鼠体内。八周后,使用组织学和电子显微镜技术评估骨形成情况。两种细胞类型——BMMSC和NE-MSC——均显示典型的干细胞表面标志物——CD73+、CD90+、CD105+、巢蛋白 - ,并表现出与MSC相关的成骨、软骨生成和脂肪生成多能性。NE-MSC产生的胶原蛋白和碱性磷酸酶比BMMSC少。在转录水平上,NE-MSC更大量地表达编码骨唾液蛋白、骨钙素和骨桥蛋白的三个基因,而BMMSC产生额外拷贝的RunX2。BMMSC和NE-MSC在BCP和BG上黏附并存活。实验表明,仅在移植到BCP生物材料上的BMMSC中观察到骨形成。尽管BMMSC和NE-MSC属于间充质干细胞的同一超家族,但它们表现出显著差异,以及。对于未来的临床应用,BMMSC与BCP生物材料的联合似乎最有前景。