• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过影像学特征预测经颈动脉血运重建不良结局。

Predicting Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Adverse Outcomes by Imaging Characteristics.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA.

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Nov;87:388-401. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.05.013. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2022.05.013
PMID:35714841
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Approximately 20-30% of ischemic strokes are caused by internal carotid artery stenosis. Stroke is the leading cause of disability and the second leading cause of death in the United States. Second generation transcarotid arterial revascularization (TCAR) stenting, using the ENROUTE flow reversal technology to prevent embolic stroke during the stenting process, has demonstrated stroke and death outcomes equivalent to carotid endarterectomy with reduced cranial nerve injury. However, at present, it is not known whether imaging characteristics obtained preoperatively can predict outcomes of TCAR procedures.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent TCAR with flow reversal at three hospitals within a single hospital network who had computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance imaging angiography, or preoperative diagnostic angiogram to determine whether carotid and lesion characteristics could predict patients who experienced major adverse critical events (MACE) versus those who did not. MACE was defined as myocardial infarction at 30 days, restenosis/persistent stenosis (peak systolic velocity within the stent >230 cm/sec by postoperative ultrasound), stroke within any time of follow-up, or death within 1 year of TCAR. Student's t-tests and Chi-squared tests were used to compare imaging characteristics, such as presence of pinpoint stenosis, calcification within the common carotid artery at the take-off from the aorta, and plaque length in millimeters. Binomial logistic regression was used to examine the likelihood that imaging characteristics were associated with MACE.

RESULTS

Of 220 patients who underwent TCAR in our network, seven were excluded because flow reversal was not used or appropriate imaging had not been performed prior to TCAR. Of the 213 patients who were included in analysis, the median length of follow-up was 10.8 months (interquartile range: 3.4-33.1 months). Twelve percent (26/213) experienced MACE and a model based on imaging characteristics was statistically significant in predicting MACE with 68% accuracy (P = 0.005). The presence of pinpoint stenosis was highly predictive of MACE (hazards ratio: 3.34, confidence interval: 1.2 to 9.3, P = 0.021). A shorter clavicle to carotid bifurcation distance was associated with an increased likelihood of experiencing MACE (P = 0.009) but it was weakly predictive (hazards ratio: 1.03, confidence interval: 1.01 to 1.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative imaging characteristics, such as pinpoint stenosis and clavicle to carotid bifurcation distance, can be used to predict adverse outcomes in TCAR placement.

摘要

背景

约 20-30%的缺血性中风是由颈内动脉狭窄引起的。中风是美国导致残疾和死亡的第二大原因。第二代经颈动脉血管重建(TCAR)支架置入术使用 ENROUTE 血流逆转技术来预防支架置入过程中的栓塞性中风,已证明其在降低颅神经损伤的同时具有与颈动脉内膜切除术相当的中风和死亡结果。然而,目前尚不清楚术前获得的影像学特征是否可以预测 TCA 手术的结果。

方法

本回顾性队列研究纳入了在单一医院网络内的三家医院接受经颈动脉血流逆转 TCA 的患者,这些患者进行了计算机断层血管造影术、磁共振血管造影术或术前诊断性血管造影术,以确定颈动脉和病变特征是否可以预测发生主要不良关键事件(MACE)的患者与未发生 MACE 的患者。MACE 定义为术后 30 天内心肌梗死、再狭窄/持续性狭窄(支架内峰值收缩速度>230cm/sec,术后超声检查)、任何时间随访内中风或 TCA 后 1 年内死亡。使用 Student's t 检验和卡方检验比较影像学特征,如针尖样狭窄、主动脉起始处颈总动脉内钙化和毫米级斑块长度。二项逻辑回归用于检查影像学特征与 MACE 发生的可能性之间的关系。

结果

在我们的网络中,有 220 名患者接受了 TCA 治疗,其中 7 名患者因未使用血流逆转或 TCA 前未进行适当的影像学检查而被排除在外。在纳入分析的 213 名患者中,中位随访时间为 10.8 个月(四分位间距:3.4-33.1 个月)。12%(26/213)发生 MACE,基于影像学特征的模型在预测 MACE 方面具有统计学意义,准确率为 68%(P=0.005)。针尖样狭窄的存在高度预测 MACE(风险比:3.34,置信区间:1.2 至 9.3,P=0.021)。锁骨至颈动脉分叉距离较短与发生 MACE 的可能性增加相关(P=0.009),但预测能力较弱(风险比:1.03,置信区间:1.01 至 1.05)。

结论

术前影像学特征,如针尖样狭窄和锁骨至颈动脉分叉距离,可用于预测 TCA 置入后的不良结局。

相似文献

1
Predicting Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Adverse Outcomes by Imaging Characteristics.通过影像学特征预测经颈动脉血运重建不良结局。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Nov;87:388-401. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.05.013. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
2
Evaluating postoperative outcomes in patients with hostile neck anatomy undergoing transcarotid artery revascularization versus transfemoral carotid artery stenting.评估颈部解剖结构复杂的患者接受经颈动脉血管重建术与经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术的术后结局。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jan;77(1):191-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.08.030. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
3
The impact of age on in-hospital outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization, transfemoral carotid artery stenting, and carotid endarterectomy.年龄对经颈动脉血管重建术、经股颈动脉血管支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术住院治疗结果的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Sep;72(3):931-942.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.037. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
4
Outcomes of transfemoral carotid artery stenting and transcarotid artery revascularization for restenosis after prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy.经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术治疗同侧颈动脉再狭窄后的转颈动脉血运重建术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Feb;75(2):561-571.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.245. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
5
Outcomes of early transcarotid artery revascularization versus carotid endarterectomy after acute neurologic events.急性神经事件后早期经颈动脉血管重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术的疗效比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;76(3):760-768. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.04.025. Epub 2022 May 23.
6
Physiologic risk factors increase risk of myocardial infarction with transcarotid artery revascularization in prospective trials.生理风险因素会增加经颈动脉血运重建术治疗的前瞻性试验中心肌梗死的风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Apr;77(4):1192-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.12.013. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
7
Transcarotid artery revascularization versus transfemoral carotid artery stenting in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.血管外科学会血管质量倡议中的经颈动脉动脉血运重建与经股颈动脉血管成形术。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):92-103.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
8
A single-center experience of 30-day perioperative and one year clinical outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization in 100 consecutive patients.100 例连续患者经颈动脉血运重建术的 30 天围手术期和一年临床结局的单中心经验。
Vascular. 2023 Dec;31(6):1161-1172. doi: 10.1177/17085381221106330. Epub 2022 May 29.
9
Outcomes of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization and Carotid Endarterectomy at a Single Institution.单中心颈动脉血运重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术的结果。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73:329-335. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.10.023. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
10
Carotid lesion length independently predicts stroke and death after transcarotid artery revascularization and transfemoral carotid artery stenting.颈动脉病变长度可独立预测经颈动脉血管重建术和经股颈动脉支架置入术后的中风和死亡情况。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Dec;76(6):1615-1623.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.06.099. Epub 2022 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
"TCAR or nothing": the only options for some complex carotid stenosis.“非TCAR即无其他选择”:一些复杂颈动脉狭窄的唯一选择
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2023 Dec 17;10(2):101404. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101404. eCollection 2024 Apr.