Suppr超能文献

明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)中边缘性综合征障碍与早期精神分裂症的关系。

Relationship of borderline syndrome disorders to early schizophrenia on the MMPI.

作者信息

Edell W S

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1987 Mar;43(2):163-76. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198703)43:2<163::aid-jclp2270430202>3.0.co;2-s.

Abstract

An intriguing question in modern psychopathology is the relationship of borderline syndrome disorders to other psychopathological conditions and to each other. The present study compared groups of DSM-III defined Borderline Personality Disorder (N = 51), Schizotypal Personality Disorder (N = 14), and Mixed Borderline-Schizotypal Personality Disorder (N = 17), with CATEGO diagnosed Schizophrenic Disorder of recent onset (N = 30) and nonpsychiatric controls (N = 20) on the MMPI. Profile and individual scale analyses revealed gross elevations on multiple scales in each of the patient groups, as compared with controls. Subtle differences in test performance between the borderline personality and schizotypal personality groups are noted and are consistent with their separation as disorders in DSM-III. Multivariate profile analyses distinguished the borderline, schizotypal, and early schizophrenic groups from each other, but not from the mixed personality group. Thus, this latter group may serve to bridge these diverse populations.

摘要

现代精神病理学中一个有趣的问题是边缘性综合征障碍与其他精神病理状况之间以及它们彼此之间的关系。本研究在明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)上,将DSM-III定义的边缘型人格障碍组(N = 51)、分裂型人格障碍组(N = 14)、边缘型与分裂型人格混合障碍组(N = 17),与CATEGO诊断的近期起病的精神分裂症障碍组(N = 30)和非精神科对照组(N = 20)进行了比较。剖面图和单个量表分析显示,与对照组相比,每个患者组在多个量表上都有显著升高。边缘型人格组和分裂型人格组在测试表现上存在细微差异,这与它们在DSM-III中作为不同障碍的区分是一致的。多变量剖面图分析将边缘型、分裂型和早期精神分裂症组彼此区分开来,但与混合人格组没有区分开来。因此,后一组可能起到连接这些不同人群的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验