Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France.
Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France.
J Clin Anesth. 2022 Oct;81:110906. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110906. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
The objective of this study was to determine whether postoperative morphine requirement in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery was reduced by opioid-free anesthesia (OFA), as compared to an anesthetic strategy using opioids (opioid balanced anesthesia (OBA)) and to investigate the differences that may exist between the use of clonidine and dexmedetomidine in the context of OFA.
Retrospective cohort study.
Academic medical center in Lyon, France.
257 patients who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery between March 2017 and March 2019. 77 patients were included in the OBA group and 180 in the OFA group. The OFA group was subdivided in two: 90 patients received OFA with clonidine (OFAC) and 90 received OFA with dexmedetomidine (OFAD).
Proportion of patients who did not receive morphine during the first 24 postoperative hours.
During the first 24 postoperative hours, the proportion of patients who did not require morphine was significantly higher in the OFA (87%) than in the OBA (52%) group (OR: 6.31; 95% CI [3.38; 11.80], P < 0.001). This difference remained significant after adjustment for age, body mass index, sex, type and duration of surgery (OR: 7.99; 95% CI [4.05; 16.48], P < 0.001). A greater proportion of patients in the OFAD (93%) than in the OFAC group (81%, P = 0.026) did not receive morphine during the same period.
OFA is associated with a lower morphine requirement than with OBA during the first 24 h after bariatric surgery. In addition, OFAD seems to be more effective than OFAC in order to reduce morphine consumption.
本研究旨在比较无阿片麻醉(OFA)与使用阿片类药物的麻醉策略(阿片类药物平衡麻醉(OBA)),确定肥胖患者行腹腔镜减重手术后,OFA 是否会减少术后吗啡需求,并探讨 OFA 中使用可乐定和右美托咪定之间可能存在的差异。
回顾性队列研究。
法国里昂的一所学术医学中心。
2017 年 3 月至 2019 年 3 月间行腹腔镜减重手术的 257 例患者。77 例患者纳入 OBA 组,180 例患者纳入 OFA 组。OFA 组再分为两组:90 例患者接受可乐定 OFA(OFAC),90 例患者接受右美托咪定 OFA(OFAD)。
术后 24 小时内未接受吗啡的患者比例。
术后 24 小时内,OFA 组(87%)未接受吗啡的患者比例明显高于 OBA 组(52%)(OR:6.31;95%CI[3.38;11.80],P<0.001)。调整年龄、体重指数、性别、手术类型和持续时间后,这一差异仍有统计学意义(OR:7.99;95%CI[4.05;16.48],P<0.001)。同一时期,OFAD 组(93%)未接受吗啡的患者比例高于 OFAC 组(81%)(P=0.026)。
与 OBA 相比,OFA 可减少减重手术后 24 小时内吗啡的需求。此外,与 OFAC 相比,OFAD 似乎更能减少吗啡的消耗。