Suppr超能文献

右美托咪定辅助阿片类药物节省麻醉对漏斗胸微创修复术后阿片类药物使用的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。

Impact of Dexmedetomidine-Based Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia on Opioid Use After Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Kim Minju, Huh Jaewon, Choi Hoon, Hwang Wonjung

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 29;13(23):7264. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237264.

Abstract

Opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA) using dexmedetomidine has gained attention as an alternative to opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) due to its potential to reduce opioid consumption and the associated side effects. This study aimed to investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine-based OSA on postoperative pain intensity, opioid consumption, and recovery outcomes in patients undergoing a minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum. Eighty-four patients undergoing a minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum were randomized to either the OSA group, receiving dexmedetomidine, or the OBA group, receiving remifentanil. The primary outcome was the total amount of analgesics administered within 24 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included pain intensity and analgesic consumption over 48 h, recovery outcomes, intraoperative hemodynamics, and opioid-related complications. The OFA group reported a significantly reduced total morphine-equivalent dose within 24 h (55.4 ± 31.1 mg vs. 80.2 ± 26.7 mg, < 0.001) and lower VAS scores at 24 h (3.9 ± 1.5 vs. 5.4 ± 2.1, < 0.001). Pain intensity was lower, and analgesic consumption was reduced in the OSA group 1-6, 6-24, and 24-48 h after surgery. Recovery times and intraoperative hemodynamics were comparable between the groups, with no significant differences in opioid-related complications. Dexmedetomidine-based OSA effectively reduces postoperative pain and opioid use without compromising recovery or hemodynamic stability. These findings support its use as a viable alternative to OBA, particularly in the minimally invasive repair of the pectus excavatum.

摘要

由于右美托咪定具有减少阿片类药物用量及相关副作用的潜力,使用右美托咪定的阿片类药物节省麻醉(OSA)作为基于阿片类药物的麻醉(OBA)的替代方法已受到关注。本研究旨在调查基于右美托咪定的OSA对漏斗胸微创修复患者术后疼痛强度、阿片类药物用量及恢复结局的影响。84例接受漏斗胸微创修复的患者被随机分为OSA组(接受右美托咪定)或OBA组(接受瑞芬太尼)。主要结局是术后24小时内给予的镇痛药总量。次要结局包括48小时内的疼痛强度和镇痛药用量、恢复结局、术中血流动力学以及阿片类药物相关并发症。OSA组术后24小时内的总吗啡当量剂量显著降低(55.4±31.1mg对80.2±26.7mg,<0.001),且24小时时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)更低(3.9±1.5对5.4±2.1,<0.001)。术后1 - 6小时、6 - 24小时和24 - 48小时,OSA组的疼痛强度更低,镇痛药用量减少。两组间恢复时间和术中血流动力学相当,阿片类药物相关并发症无显著差异。基于右美托咪定的OSA可有效减轻术后疼痛和减少阿片类药物使用,且不影响恢复或血流动力学稳定性。这些发现支持将其作为OBA的可行替代方法,尤其是在漏斗胸微创修复中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3241/11642115/4c855edc1307/jcm-13-07264-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验