• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在初次全膝关节置换术中,使用抗生素骨水泥与普通骨水泥预防假体周围关节感染的综合荟萃分析。

Comprehensive meta-analysis of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement versus plain bone cement in primary total knee arthroplasty for preventing periprosthetic joint infection.

机构信息

Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan, 528000, Guangdong Province, China.

Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China.

出版信息

Chin J Traumatol. 2022 Nov;25(6):325-330. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.cjtee.2022.06.001
PMID:35717367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9751532/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) was usually used to prevent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in primary total knee arthroplasty (PTKA), but whether to use ALBC or plain bone cement in PTKA remains unclear. We aimed to compare the occurrence rate of PJI using two different cements, and to investigate the efficacy of different antibiotic types and doses administered in preventing surgical site infection (SSI) with ALBC.

METHODS

The availability of ALBC for preventing PJI was evaluated by using a systematic review and meta-analysis referring to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Existing articles until December 2021 involving PTKA patients with both ALBC and plain bone cement cohorts were scanned by searching "total knee arthroplasty", "antibiotic-loaded cement", "antibiotic prophylaxis", "antibiotic-impregnated cement" and "antibiotic-laden cement" in the database of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. Subgroup analysis included the effectiveness of different antibiotic types and doses in preventing SSI with ALBC. The modified Jadad scale was employed to score the qualities of included articles.

RESULTS

Eleven quantitative studies were enrolled, including 34,159 knees undergoing PTKA. The meta-analysis results demonstrated that the use of prophylactic ALBC could significantly reduce the prevalence of deep incisional SSI after PTKA, whereas there was no significant reduction in the rate of superficial incisional SSI. Moreover, gentamicin-loaded cement was effective in preventing deep incisional SSI, and the use of high-dose ALBC significantly reduced the rate of deep incisional SSI after PTKA. Besides, no significant adverse reactions and complications were stated during the use of ALBC in PTKA.

CONCLUSION

The preventive application of ALBC during PTKA could reduce the rates of deep PJI. Furthermore, bone cement containing gentamicin and high-dose ALBC could even better prevent deep infection after PTKA. However, the existing related articles are mostly single-center and retrospective studies, and further high-quality ones are needed for confirmation.

摘要

目的

抗生素骨水泥(ALBC)通常用于预防初次全膝关节置换术(PTKA)中的假体周围关节感染(PJI),但在 PTKA 中使用 ALBC 还是普通骨水泥仍不清楚。我们旨在比较两种不同骨水泥使用后 PJI 的发生率,并探讨 ALBC 中不同抗生素类型和剂量预防手术部位感染(SSI)的效果。

方法

我们参考系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目,通过系统评价和荟萃分析评估 ALBC 预防 PJI 的效果。通过在 PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆中搜索“全膝关节置换术”、“抗生素负载水泥”、“抗生素预防”、“抗生素浸渍水泥”和“抗生素负载水泥”,扫描了截至 2021 年 12 月涉及使用 ALBC 和普通骨水泥队列的 PTKA 患者的现有文章。亚组分析包括不同类型和剂量的抗生素在预防 ALBC 引起的 SSI 中的效果。采用改良 Jadad 量表对纳入文章的质量进行评分。

结果

共纳入 11 项定量研究,包括 34159 例接受 PTKA 的膝关节。荟萃分析结果表明,预防性使用 ALBC 可显著降低 PTKA 后深部切口 SSI 的发生率,但对浅部切口 SSI 的发生率无显著降低。此外,庆大霉素负载水泥在预防深部切口 SSI 方面有效,且高剂量 ALBC 的使用可显著降低 PTKA 后深部切口 SSI 的发生率。此外,在 PTKA 中使用 ALBC 未报告明显的不良反应和并发症。

结论

在 PTKA 中预防性应用 ALBC 可降低深部 PJI 的发生率。此外,含庆大霉素的骨水泥和高剂量 ALBC 甚至可以更好地预防 PTKA 后的深部感染。然而,现有的相关文章大多是单中心和回顾性研究,需要进一步的高质量研究来证实。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d3/9751532/3ac9491595c5/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d3/9751532/bd1fa8f086a9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d3/9751532/1b3725141ffe/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d3/9751532/c058239a9f05/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d3/9751532/0307c2ebd158/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d3/9751532/3ac9491595c5/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d3/9751532/bd1fa8f086a9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d3/9751532/1b3725141ffe/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d3/9751532/c058239a9f05/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d3/9751532/0307c2ebd158/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d3/9751532/3ac9491595c5/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Comprehensive meta-analysis of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement versus plain bone cement in primary total knee arthroplasty for preventing periprosthetic joint infection.在初次全膝关节置换术中,使用抗生素骨水泥与普通骨水泥预防假体周围关节感染的综合荟萃分析。
Chin J Traumatol. 2022 Nov;25(6):325-330. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
2
The Hidden Cost of Commercial Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement: A Systematic Review of Clinical Results and Cost Implications Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.商用抗生素载骨水泥的隐性成本:全膝关节置换术后临床结果和成本影响的系统评价。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3789-3792. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.009. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
3
Antibiotic-loaded bone cement in primary total knee arthroplasty: does it reduce the risk of periprosthetic joint infection?初次全膝关节置换术中载抗生素骨水泥:它能降低假体周围关节感染的风险吗?
Hosp Pract (1995). 2020 Oct;48(4):188-195. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2020.1769417. Epub 2020 May 27.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis of antibiotic-loaded bone cement for prevention of deep surgical site infections following primary total joint replacement.抗生素骨水泥用于预防初次全关节置换术后深部手术部位感染的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Infect Chemother. 2024 Sep;30(9):904-911. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
5
The Economics of Antibiotic Cement in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Added Cost with No Reduction in Infection Rates.全膝关节置换术中抗生素骨水泥的经济学分析:成本增加但感染率未降低。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Sep;34(9):2096-2101. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.043. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
6
Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty With or Without Antibiotic Bone Cement.全膝关节置换术后应用或不应用抗生素骨水泥的假体周围关节感染。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2412898. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12898.
7
Lack of efficacy of prophylactic application of antibiotic-loaded bone cement for prevention of infection in primary total knee arthroplasty: results of a meta-analysis.预防性应用含抗生素骨水泥预防初次全膝关节置换术感染的疗效欠佳:一项荟萃分析的结果
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Apr;16(2):183-7. doi: 10.1089/sur.2014.044. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
8
Antibiotic Laden Bone Cement Does Not Reduce Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection Risk in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.抗生素骨水泥在初次全膝关节置换术中不能降低急性假体周围关节感染风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S2):S229-S234. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.068. Epub 2024 May 3.
9
Cement loaded with high-dose gentamicin and clindamycin does not reduce the risk of subsequent infection after aseptic total hip or knee revision arthroplasty: a preliminary study.载有高剂量庆大霉素和克林霉素的骨水泥不能降低无菌性全髋关节或膝关节翻修术后后续感染的风险:一项初步研究。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Jul 24;25(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00775-1.
10
Antibiotic-Laden Bone Cement Use and Revision Risk After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in U.S. Veterans.美国退伍军人初次全膝关节置换术后使用载抗生素骨水泥与翻修风险。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Nov 18;102(22):1939-1947. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00102.

引用本文的文献

1
Global research trends of antibiotic-loaded bone cement: A bibliometric and visualized study.载抗生素骨水泥的全球研究趋势:一项文献计量学与可视化研究
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 22;10(17):e36720. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36720. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
2
Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty With or Without Antibiotic Bone Cement.全膝关节置换术后应用或不应用抗生素骨水泥的假体周围关节感染。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2412898. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12898.
3
Evaluating the efficacy of combined flap coverage, antibiotic-loaded bone cement and negative pressure irrigation in traumatic osteomyelitis management.

本文引用的文献

1
2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection: Research Priorities from the General Assembly Questions.2018 年肌肉骨骼感染国际共识会议:大会提问的研究重点。
J Orthop Res. 2019 May;37(5):997-1006. doi: 10.1002/jor.24293. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
2
Does the Use of Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement Have an Effect on Deep Infection in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Practice?使用含抗生素骨水泥对初次全膝关节置换术患者深部感染是否有影响?
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019 Apr;20(3):244-246. doi: 10.1089/sur.2018.123. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
3
The Hidden Cost of Commercial Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement: A Systematic Review of Clinical Results and Cost Implications Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.
评估联合皮瓣覆盖、抗生素骨水泥及负压冲洗在创伤性骨髓炎治疗中的疗效。
Int Wound J. 2024 Jan;21(1):e14650. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14650.
4
Antimicrobials in polymethylmethacrylate: from prevention to prosthetic joint infection treatment: basic principles and risk of resistance.聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯中的抗菌剂:从预防到人工关节感染治疗:基本原则与耐药风险
Arthroplasty. 2023 Mar 2;5(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00166-7.
商用抗生素载骨水泥的隐性成本:全膝关节置换术后临床结果和成本影响的系统评价。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3789-3792. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.009. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
4
Is the Commercial Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement Useful in Prophylaxis and Cost Saving After Knee and Hip Joint Arthroplasty? The Transatlantic Paradox.含抗生素的商用骨水泥在膝关节和髋关节置换术后的预防及成本节约方面是否有用?跨大西洋的悖论。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Apr;32(4):1095-1099. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.012. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
5
Surgical Site Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Risk Factors in Patients With Timely Administration of Systemic Prophylactic Antibiotics.全膝关节置换术后手术部位感染:及时给予全身性预防性抗生素患者的危险因素
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jul;31(7):1568-73. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.017. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
6
Antibiotic Bone Cement Cannot Reduce Deep Infection After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.抗生素骨水泥不能降低初次全膝关节置换术后的深部感染率。
Orthopedics. 2015 Jun;38(6):e462-6. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20150603-52.
7
Lack of efficacy of prophylactic application of antibiotic-loaded bone cement for prevention of infection in primary total knee arthroplasty: results of a meta-analysis.预防性应用含抗生素骨水泥预防初次全膝关节置换术感染的疗效欠佳:一项荟萃分析的结果
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Apr;16(2):183-7. doi: 10.1089/sur.2014.044. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
8
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
9
Risk stratified usage of antibiotic-loaded bone cement for primary total knee arthroplasty: short term infection outcomes with a standardized cement protocol.抗生素骨水泥在初次全膝关节置换中的风险分层应用:标准化骨水泥应用方案的短期感染结局。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Aug;29(8):1622-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.02.032. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
10
Routine use of antibiotic laden bone cement for primary total knee arthroplasty: impact on infecting microbial patterns and resistance profiles.在初次全膝关节置换术中常规使用含抗生素骨水泥:对感染微生物模式和耐药谱的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jun;29(6):1123-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.004. Epub 2013 Dec 10.