Unit for Bereavement Research, Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 11, Aarhus C DK-8000, Denmark; Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 11, Bartholins Allé 9, Bld. 1350, Aarhus C DK-8000, Denmark.
Centre for Compassion-Focused Therapy, Møllestien 52, Aarhus C DK-8000, Denmark.
Psychiatry Res. 2022 Aug;314:114683. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114683. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
Prolonged grief disorder is a debilitating condition, which affects approximately one out of ten who lose a loved one. While existing meta-analyses have synthesized evidence regarding the overall effect of psychological interventions for pathological grief across different types of psychotherapy, it remains clinically relevant to explore whether specific types of psychological interventions are efficacious in the treatment of grief. The present study investigated the efficacy of group-based Compassion-Focused Therapy (CFT) for adults who had lost a spouse or a parent, and who reported clinically relevant levels of prolonged grief symptoms (PGS) at 11 months post-loss. A total of 82 participants were randomized to the CFT group (n = 42) or the waitlist control (n = 40). Time × group interactions showed no statistically significant effects of the intervention on the primary outcome PGS at post-intervention or 6-month follow-up. Likewise, no statistically significant effects were found for any of the secondary outcomes or process variables, with the exception of posttraumatic stress symptoms and self-reassurance. Taken together, in the present study group-based CFT did not emerge as an efficacious treatment for PGS. Possible explanations include that CFT may not target core maintaining processes in PGS and that the group-based, 8-week operationalization of CFT may be less than optimal.
持续性悲伤障碍是一种使人虚弱的疾病,大约十分之一失去亲人的人会受到影响。虽然现有的荟萃分析已经综合了关于不同类型心理治疗中病理性悲伤的心理干预整体效果的证据,但探索特定类型的心理干预是否对悲伤的治疗有效仍然具有临床意义。本研究调查了基于小组的聚焦于怜悯的疗法(CFT)对失去配偶或父母的成年人的疗效,这些成年人在失去亲人后 11 个月报告了临床上相关水平的持续性悲伤症状(PGS)。共有 82 名参与者被随机分配到 CFT 组(n=42)或候补名单对照组(n=40)。时间×组的交互作用表明,干预对干预后或 6 个月随访时的主要结局 PGS 没有统计学上显著的影响。同样,对于任何次要结局或过程变量,除了创伤后应激症状和自我安慰外,也没有发现统计学上显著的影响。综上所述,在本研究中,基于小组的 CFT 并没有成为治疗 PGS 的有效方法。可能的解释包括 CFT 可能没有针对 PGS 的核心维持过程,并且基于小组的、8 周的 CFT 实施可能不够理想。