Korkut Bora, Bud Marius, Kukey Pelin, Sancakli Hande Sar
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Conservative Odontology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
Med Pharm Rep. 2022 Jan;95(1):71-79. doi: 10.15386/mpr-1973. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
The aim was to assess the effect of surface sealants on the color stability of different composite materials.
120 samples were prepared using Filtek Ultimate (3M, USA), Charisma Topaz (Kulzer, Germany), and Clearfil Majesty Es-2 Premium (Kuraray Noritake, Japan) composites. The samples were polished with polishing discs and divided by test groups (n=10 for each), regarding the sealant used; Permaseal (Ultradent Products, USA), Biscover LV (Bisco, USA), Optiglaze Clear (GC Corp., Japan) and control. The samples were discolored for 144 hours in coffee solution at constant 37ºC, renewing daily. Color measurements were performed at the baseline, following the sealant application, and after discoloration procedure, using a spectrophotometer (EasyShade 5, Vita-Zahnfabrik, Germany). The collected LCh* coordinates were converted to corresponding Lab* coordinates and the color changes (ΔE) were calculated.
All the sealants presented perceptible (>1.2) and unacceptable (>2.7) color changes. Biscover LV presented the lowest ΔE among all sealants (). The highest ΔE was observed for Permaseal (). Color changes for Optiglaze and control groups were similar (p≥0.05). Filtek Ultimate presented the highest color stability (), followed by Charisma Topaz and Clearfil Majesty. The combination of Filtek Ultimate with Biscover LV was considered to have the highest color stability, whereas the combination of Clearfil Majesty with Permaseal was considered the lowest, among all.
Experimented sealants were considered relatively effective on color stability of resin composites depending on the type of the sealant and the composite material. However, the use of surface sealants may not be advantageous every time. Biscover LV have inhibited the level of discoloration, whereas Permaseal had an increasing effect generally.
评估表面封闭剂对不同复合材料颜色稳定性的影响。
使用Filtek Ultimate(美国3M公司)、Charisma Topaz(德国库尔兹公司)和Clearfil Majesty Es-2 Premium(日本可乐丽诺瑞特公司)复合材料制备120个样本。样本用抛光盘抛光,并根据所用封闭剂分为测试组(每组n = 10);Permaseal(美国Ultradent Products公司)、Biscover LV(美国Bisco公司)、Optiglaze Clear(日本GC公司)以及对照组。样本在37ºC恒温的咖啡溶液中变色144小时,每天更换溶液。在基线、涂抹封闭剂后以及变色处理后,使用分光光度计(德国维他齿科工厂的EasyShade 5)进行颜色测量。将收集到的LCh坐标转换为相应的Lab坐标,并计算颜色变化(ΔE)。
所有封闭剂均呈现出明显(>1.2)且不可接受(>2.7)的颜色变化。Biscover LV在所有封闭剂中呈现出最低的ΔE()。Permaseal的ΔE最高()。Optiglaze组和对照组的颜色变化相似(p≥0.05)。Filtek Ultimate呈现出最高的颜色稳定性(),其次是Charisma Topaz和Clearfil Majesty。在所有组合中,Filtek Ultimate与Biscover LV的组合被认为具有最高的颜色稳定性,而Clearfil Majesty与Permaseal的组合被认为是最低的。
根据封闭剂类型和复合材料类型,实验中的封闭剂在树脂复合材料颜色稳定性方面被认为相对有效。然而,表面封闭剂的使用并非每次都有利。Biscover LV抑制了变色程度,而Permaseal通常具有加剧变色的作用。