Hoge Connor G, Matar Robert N, Khalil Lafi S, Buchan John A, Johnson Cole M, Grawe Brian M
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022 Apr;10(4):311-319. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2021.53662.2668.
The two most common surgical treatment modalities for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL), patellar tendon (PT) and hamstring tendon (HS) autografts, have been shown to have outcomes that are both similar and favorable; however, many of these are short or intermediate-term. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a minimum 10-year follow-up data to compare the long-term outcomes of ACL reconstructions performed using PT and HS autografts.
This systematic review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A search of three databases (PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE) was performed to identify RCTs with a minimum of 10-year follow-up that compared clinical and/or functional outcomes between PT and HS autografts.
Four RCTs with a total of 299 patients were included in the study. The mean follow-up ranged from 10.2 to 17 years (mean, 14.79 years). No significant differences in knee laxity or clinical outcome scores were demonstrated in any of the studies. One study found that PT autografts were significantly more likely to have osteoarthritis identified by radiographic findings. Two studies found that patients with PT autografts reported increase kneeling pain, while none of the four studies reported a difference in anterior knee pain. There were no significant differences in graft failure rates.
This review demonstrates no long-term difference in clinical or functional outcomes between PT and HS autografts. However, radiographic and subjective outcomes indicate that patients with PT autografts may experience greater kneeling pain and osteoarthritis. Therefore, orthopaedic surgeons should consider patient-centric factors when discussing graft options with patients.
前交叉韧带重建(ACL)最常用的两种手术治疗方式,即髌腱(PT)和腘绳肌腱(HS)自体移植,已被证明具有相似且良好的效果;然而,其中许多研究都是短期或中期的。本系统评价的目的是评估随访至少10年的随机对照试验(RCT),以比较使用PT和HS自体移植进行ACL重建的长期效果。
本系统评价遵循PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南。对三个数据库(PubMed、Cochrane和EMBASE)进行检索,以确定随访至少10年、比较PT和HS自体移植临床和/或功能结果的RCT。
该研究纳入了四项RCT,共299例患者。平均随访时间为10.2至17年(平均14.79年)。在任何一项研究中,均未发现膝关节松弛度或临床结果评分存在显著差异。一项研究发现,通过影像学检查发现,PT自体移植更易发生骨关节炎。两项研究发现,接受PT自体移植的患者报告跪姿疼痛增加,而四项研究均未报告前膝疼痛存在差异。移植失败率无显著差异。
本评价表明,PT和HS自体移植在临床或功能结果方面没有长期差异。然而,影像学和主观结果表明,接受PT自体移植的患者可能会经历更严重的跪姿疼痛和骨关节炎。因此,骨科医生在与患者讨论移植选择时应考虑以患者为中心的因素。