Sanders Thomas L, Kremers Hilal Maradit, Bryan Andrew J, Fruth Kristin M, Larson Dirk R, Pareek Ayoosh, Levy Bruce A, Stuart Michael J, Dahm Diane L, Krych Aaron J
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;44(7):1699-707. doi: 10.1177/0363546516634325. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
Reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears may potentially prevent the development of secondary meniscal injuries and arthritis.
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate the protective benefit of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in preventing subsequent meniscal tears or arthritis, (2) determine if earlier ACLR (<1 year after injury) offers greater protective benefits than delayed reconstruction (≥1 year after injury), and (3) evaluate factors predictive of long-term sequelae after ACLR. The hypothesis was that the incidence of secondary meniscal tears, arthritis, and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) would be higher in patients treated nonoperatively after ACL tears than patients treated with surgical reconstruction.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
This retrospective study included a population-based incidence cohort of 964 patients with new-onset, isolated ACL tears between 1990 and 2000 as well as an age- and sex-matched cohort of 964 patients without ACL tears. A chart review was performed to collect information related to the initial injury, treatment, and outcomes. A total of 509 patients were treated with early ACLR, 91 with delayed ACLR, and 364 nonoperatively. All patients were retrospectively followed (range, 2 months to 25 years) to determine the development of subsequent meniscal tears, arthritis, or TKA.
At a mean follow-up of 13.7 years, patients treated nonoperatively after ACL tears had a significantly higher likelihood of developing a secondary meniscal tear (hazard ratio [HR], 5.4; 95% CI, 3.8-7.6), being diagnosed with arthritis (HR, 6.0; 95% CI, 4.3-8.4), and undergoing TKA (HR, 16.7; 95% CI, 5.0-55.2) compared with patients treated with ACLR. Similarly, patients treated with delayed ACLR had a higher likelihood of developing a secondary meniscal tear (HR, 3.9; 95% CI, 2.2-6.9) and being diagnosed with arthritis (HR, 6.2; 95% CI, 3.4-11.4) compared with patients treated with early ACLR. Age >21 years at the time of injury, articular cartilage damage, and medial/lateral meniscal tears were predictive of arthritis after ACLR.
Patients treated with ACLR have a significantly lower risk of secondary meniscal tears, symptomatic arthritis, and TKA when compared with patients treated nonoperatively after ACL tears. Similarly, early ACLR significantly reduces the risk of subsequent meniscal tears and arthritis compared with delayed ACLR.
前交叉韧带(ACL)撕裂的重建可能会预防继发性半月板损伤和关节炎的发生。
目的/假设:本研究的目的是(1)评估ACL重建术(ACLR)在预防后续半月板撕裂或关节炎方面的保护作用,(2)确定早期ACLR(受伤后<1年)是否比延迟重建(受伤后≥1年)具有更大的保护作用,以及(3)评估ACLR后长期后遗症的预测因素。假设是ACL撕裂后接受非手术治疗的患者发生继发性半月板撕裂、关节炎和全膝关节置换术(TKA)的发生率高于接受手术重建治疗的患者。
队列研究;证据等级,3级。
这项回顾性研究纳入了1990年至2000年间964例新发孤立性ACL撕裂患者的基于人群的发病队列,以及964例无ACL撕裂的年龄和性别匹配队列。通过查阅病历收集与初始损伤、治疗和结果相关的信息。共有509例患者接受了早期ACLR,91例接受了延迟ACLR,364例接受了非手术治疗。所有患者均进行回顾性随访(范围为2个月至25年),以确定后续半月板撕裂、关节炎或TKA的发生情况。
平均随访13.7年时,与接受ACLR治疗的患者相比,ACL撕裂后接受非手术治疗的患者发生继发性半月板撕裂的可能性显著更高(风险比[HR],5.4;95%可信区间[CI],3.8 - 7.6),被诊断为关节炎的可能性更高(HR,6.0;95%CI,4.3 - 8.4),接受TKA的可能性更高(HR,16.7;95%CI,5.0 - 55.2)。同样,与接受早期ACLR治疗的患者相比,接受延迟ACLR治疗的患者发生继发性半月板撕裂的可能性更高(HR,3.9;95%CI,2.2 - 6.9),被诊断为关节炎的可能性更高(HR,6.2;95%CI,3.4 - 11.4)。受伤时年龄>21岁、关节软骨损伤以及内侧/外侧半月板撕裂是ACLR后关节炎的预测因素。
与ACL撕裂后接受非手术治疗的患者相比,接受ACLR治疗的患者发生继发性半月板撕裂、症状性关节炎和TKA的风险显著更低。同样,与延迟ACLR相比,早期ACLR显著降低了后续半月板撕裂和关节炎的风险。