Riazati Sherveen, Caplan Nick, Matabuena Marcos, Hayes Philip R
Department of Sport Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Biomechanics, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Neuroscience Lab, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Jun 2;4:830278. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.830278. eCollection 2022.
To examine the time course of recovery for gait and neuromuscular function immediately after and 24-h post interval training. In addition, this study compared the impact of different statistical approaches on detecting changes.
Twenty (10F, 10M) healthy, recreational club runners performed a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) session consisting of six repetitions of 800 m. A 6-min medium intensity run was performed pre, post, and 24-h post HIIT to assess hip and knee kinematics and coordination variability. Voluntary activation and twitch force of the quadriceps, along with maximum isometric force were examined pre, post, and 24-h post significance HIIT. The time course of changes were examined using two different statistical approaches: traditional null hypothesis significance tests and "real" changes using minimum detectable change.
Immediately following the run, there were significant ( < 0.05) increases in the hip frontal kinematics and coordination variability. The runners also experienced a loss of muscular strength and neuromuscular function immediately post HIIT ( < 0.05). Individual assessment, however, showed that not all runners experienced fatigue effects immediately post HIIT. Null hypothesis significance testing revealed a lack of recovery in hip frontal kinematics, coordination variability, muscle strength, and neuromuscular function at 24-h post, however, the use of minimum detectable change suggested that most runners had recovered.
High intensity interval training resulted in altered running kinematics along with central and peripheral decrements in neuromuscular function. Most runners had recovered within 24-h, although a minority still exhibited signs of fatigue. The runners that were not able to recover prior to their run at 24-h were identified to be at an increased risk of running-related injury.
研究间歇训练后即刻及24小时后步态和神经肌肉功能的恢复时间进程。此外,本研究比较了不同统计方法对检测变化的影响。
20名(10名女性,10名男性)健康的休闲俱乐部跑步者进行了一次高强度间歇训练(HIIT),包括6次800米重复跑。在HIIT前、后以及24小时后进行一次6分钟的中等强度跑步,以评估髋部和膝部的运动学和协调性变异性。在HIIT前、后以及24小时后检测股四头肌的自主激活和抽搐力,以及最大等长力。使用两种不同的统计方法来研究变化的时间进程:传统的零假设显著性检验和使用最小可检测变化的“实际”变化。
跑步后即刻,髋部额状面运动学和协调性变异性显著增加(<0.05)。跑步者在HIIT后即刻还经历了肌肉力量和神经肌肉功能的下降(<0.05)。然而,个体评估显示,并非所有跑步者在HIIT后即刻都经历了疲劳效应。零假设显著性检验显示,在24小时后,髋部额状面运动学、协调性变异性、肌肉力量和神经肌肉功能没有恢复,然而,使用最小可检测变化表明大多数跑步者已经恢复。
高强度间歇训练导致跑步运动学改变,同时神经肌肉功能出现中枢和外周性下降。大多数跑步者在24小时内恢复,尽管少数人仍表现出疲劳迹象。那些在24小时跑步前未能恢复的跑步者被确定有增加与跑步相关损伤的风险。