Yang Zhiwen, Tao Qiang, Mijiti Salamu, Luo Dandong, Tang Xiang, Liu Jia, Jiang Lingmin, Liu Zonghao, Liang Chen, Tu Xinyue, Zhao Peng, Luu Andreas Minh, Serra Francesco, Gelmini Roberta, Wang Yong, Zheng Yun
Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2022 May;10(10):539. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-2217.
Total pancreatectomy (TP) for pancreatic cancer (PC) has been limited historically for fear of elevated perioperative morbidity and mortality. With advances in perioperative care, TP may be an alternative option to partial pancreatectomy (PP). Limited evidence clarified the indication for these two procedures in PC patients, especially in patients with different tumor staging and location. Thus, this study aims to compare the outcomes after TP and PP for PCs of different T stages and locations.
The study identified 14,456 PC patients with potentially curable primary tumor (T1-3) who received TP or PP from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database during 2000 to 2016. Detailed clinical and tumor covariates were all collected. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were the primary endpoints of interest in this study. OS and CSS were compared between patients after TP and PP using log-rank analysis.
For all patients, except for tumor location, TP group was comparable to the PP group. OS and CSS of the TP group were worse than of the PP group (median OS: 19 20 months, P=0.0058; median CSS: 24 26 months, P=0.00098, respectively). In stratifying analyses, TP was significantly related to worse OS and CSS than PP in pancreatic head and neck cancer patients with T2-stage tumors (median OS: 18 19 months, P=0.0016; median CSS: 22 24 months, P=0.00055, respectively), whereas for patients with T1- or T3-stage pancreatic head and neck cancer as well as T1- to T3-stage pancreatic body and tail cancer or overlapping location cancer, OS and CSS of the two groups were similar (all P>0.05).
Compared with PP, TP offered worse prognosis in pancreatic head and neck cancer patients with T2-stage tumors, furthermore, TP and PP achieved comparable prognosis in patients with T1- or T3-stage pancreatic head and neck cancer as well as T1- to T3-stage pancreatic body and tail cancer or overlapping location cancer.
由于担心围手术期发病率和死亡率升高,胰腺癌(PC)的全胰切除术(TP)在历史上一直受到限制。随着围手术期护理的进展,TP可能是部分胰腺切除术(PP)的替代选择。有限的证据阐明了这两种手术在PC患者中的适应症,尤其是在不同肿瘤分期和位置的患者中。因此,本研究旨在比较不同T分期和位置的PC患者接受TP和PP后的结局。
该研究从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中确定了14456例原发性肿瘤(T1-3)可能治愈的PC患者,这些患者在2000年至2016年期间接受了TP或PP。收集了详细的临床和肿瘤协变量。总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)是本研究感兴趣的主要终点。使用对数秩分析比较TP和PP术后患者的OS和CSS。
对于所有患者,除肿瘤位置外,TP组与PP组相当。TP组的OS和CSS均比PP组差(中位OS:19对20个月,P = 0.0058;中位CSS:24对26个月,P = 0.00098)。在分层分析中,对于T2期肿瘤的胰头和颈部癌患者,TP与比PP更差的OS和CSS显著相关(中位OS:18对19个月,P = 0.0016;中位CSS:22对24个月,P = 0.00055),而对于T1或T3期胰头和颈部癌以及T1至T3期胰体和尾部癌或重叠部位癌的患者,两组的OS和CSS相似(所有P>0.05)。
与PP相比,TP在T2期肿瘤的胰头和颈部癌患者中预后更差,此外,TP和PP在T1或T3期胰头和颈部癌以及T1至T3期胰体和尾部癌或重叠部位癌的患者中预后相当。