Suppr超能文献

一种新型达芬奇机器人胰十二指肠切除术难度评分系统的建立与应用

Establishment and Application of a Novel Difficulty Scoring System for da Vinci Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy.

作者信息

Sun Hongfa, Sun Chuandong, Zhang Bingyuan, Ma Kai, Wu Zehua, Visser Brendan C, Han Bing

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2022 Jun 1;9:916014. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.916014. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) technology is developing rapidly, but there is still a lack of a specific and objective difficulty evaluation system in the field of application and training of RPD surgery.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients who underwent RPD in our hospital from November 2014 to October 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the predictors of operation difficulty and convert into a scoring system.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the group. According to the operation time (25%), intraoperative blood loss (25%), conversion to laparotomy, and major complications, the difficulty of operation was divided into low difficulty (0-2 points) and high difficulty (3-4 points). The multivariate logistic regression model included the thickness of mesenteric tissue (P1) ( = 0.035), the thickness of the abdominal wall (B1) ( = 0.017), and the preoperative albumin ( = 0.032), and the nomogram was established. AUC = 0.773 (0.645-0.901).

CONCLUSIONS

The RPD difficulty evaluation system based on the specific anatomical relationship between da Vinci's laparoscopic robotic arm and tissues/organs in the operation area can be used as a predictive tool to evaluate the surgical difficulty of patients before operation and guide clinical practice.

摘要

背景

机器人胰十二指肠切除术(RPD)技术发展迅速,但在RPD手术的应用和培训领域仍缺乏具体、客观的难度评估系统。

方法

回顾性分析2014年11月至2020年10月在我院接受RPD手术患者的临床资料。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析确定手术难度的预测因素,并转化为评分系统。

结果

该组共纳入72例患者。根据手术时间(25%)、术中出血量(25%)、中转开腹情况及主要并发症,将手术难度分为低难度(0 - 2分)和高难度(3 - 4分)。多因素逻辑回归模型包括肠系膜组织厚度(P1)(= 0.035)、腹壁厚度(B1)(= 0.017)和术前白蛋白水平(= 0.032),并建立了列线图。曲线下面积(AUC)= 0.773(0.645 - 0.901)。

结论

基于达芬奇腹腔镜机器人手臂与手术区域组织/器官之间特定解剖关系的RPD难度评估系统,可作为术前评估患者手术难度的预测工具,指导临床实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c398/9200290/c9932ed3bedb/fsurg-09-916014-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Establishment and Application of a Novel Difficulty Scoring System for da Vinci Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy.
Front Surg. 2022 Jun 1;9:916014. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.916014. eCollection 2022.
3
[Safety and learning curve of Da Vinci robotic single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy in the treatment of obesity patients].
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 May 25;25(5):454-461. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20210711-00273.
5
Indications, technique, and results of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.
Updates Surg. 2016 Sep;68(3):295-305. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0387-7. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
8
Comparison of the short-term efficacy of two types of robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Jan;26(1):19-28. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02546-0. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
10
[A Prospective Study of Da Vinci Surgical Robotic System with Chest Wall External Nursing Interventions].
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 20;23(6):487-491. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2020.101.07.

引用本文的文献

1
Tampa difficulty score: a scoring system for difficulty of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
J Robot Surg. 2024 Dec 16;19(1):27. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02189-x.

本文引用的文献

3
4
Association between age and readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.
Heart. 2020 Oct;106(20):1595-1603. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316103. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
5
Low Preoperative Albumin Levels Predict Adverse Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 May 20;102(10):889-895. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00511.
7
The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection.
Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):1-14. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003590.
8
A review of ASA physical status - historical perspectives and modern developments.
Anaesthesia. 2019 Mar;74(3):373-379. doi: 10.1111/anae.14569. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
10
Multicenter outcomes of robotic reconstruction during the early learning curve for minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy.
HPB (Oxford). 2018 Feb;20(2):155-165. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.08.032. Epub 2017 Sep 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验