Carruthers Kathryn, Hannis Dorothy, Robinson Jonathan, Armstrong Alan
School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
J Neonatal Nurs. 2023 Feb;29(1):203-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jnn.2022.06.003. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
This article outlines notable findings of a service evaluation of a COVID-19 response project, the Nurture Project (July 2020-March 2021).
The Donabedian structure-process-outcome model was used. Mixed-methods online surveys and organisational data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and statistical analysis methods.
Most staff and service users were satisfied with the project, reporting positive benefits to mental health, child development, and wellbeing. However, project outcome measures (Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale GAD-7 and the Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-9) were statistically non-significant.
Although the project was considered successful, recommendations for future service evaluation methods, outcome measurement, and future research are provided.
本文概述了一项针对新冠疫情应对项目“关爱计划”（2020年7月至2021年3月）的服务评估的显著发现。
采用了唐纳贝迪安结构-过程-结果模型。运用反思性主题分析和统计分析方法对混合方法在线调查及组织数据进行了分析。
大多数工作人员和服务使用者对该项目感到满意，报告称该项目对心理健康、儿童发展和幸福产生了积极影响。然而，项目结果测量指标（广泛性焦虑障碍量表GAD-7 和患者健康问卷PHQ-9）在统计学上无显著意义。
尽管该项目被认为是成功的，但本文针对未来服务评估方法、结果测量及未来研究提出了建议。
