一位选择人迹罕至之路的频率论者。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

A Frequentist Opting for the Road Less Traveled.

作者信息

Alasnag Mirvat, Mamas Mamas A

机构信息

Cardiac Center King Fahd Armed Forces Center Jeddah Saudi Arabia.

Keele Cardiovascular Research Group Keele University Stoke on Trent United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 20;11(12):e026446. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026446.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.122.026446

PMID:35722997

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9238654/

Abstract

摘要

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b3d/9238654/cbbb0c39eb90/JAH3-11-e026446-g001.jpg

相似文献

A Frequentist Opting for the Road Less Traveled.一位选择人迹罕至之路的频率论者。

J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 20;11(12):e026446. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026446.

Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Bifurcation Techniques for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗分叉技术的系统评价和网状Meta分析

J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 20;11(12):e025394. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025394.

Stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions: Evidence from a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.冠状动脉分叉病变的支架置入技术：来自随机临床试验网络荟萃分析的证据。

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 15;97(3):E306-E318. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29097. Epub 2020 Jul 14.

Outcomes and challenges of the provisional stenting technique: Insights from the PROGRESS-BIFURCATION registry.临时支架技术的结果和挑战：来自 PROGRESS-BIFURCATION 注册研究的见解。

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov;100(5):749-755. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30401. Epub 2022 Sep 19.

3-Year Outcomes After 2-Stent With Provisional Stenting for Complex Bifurcation Lesions Defined by DEFINITION Criteria.DEFINITION 标准定义的复杂分叉病变行双支架术治疗后 3 年的结果。

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jul 11;15(13):1310-1320. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.05.026.

Bifurcation PCI with a hybrid strategy with drug- eluting balloons versus a stepwise provisional two- stent strategy: Rationale and design of the hybrid DEB study.分叉病变 PCI 中药物洗脱球囊与分步预扩张双支架策略的杂交策略：杂交 DEB 研究的原理和设计。

Am Heart J. 2023 Dec;266:168-175. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.09.010. Epub 2023 Oct 6.

Impact of technique on bifurcation stent outcomes in the European Bifurcation Club Left Main Coronary Trial.技术对欧洲分叉俱乐部左主干冠状动脉试验中分叉支架结果的影响。

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Feb;101(3):553-562. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30575. Epub 2023 Jan 29.

Multicentre, randomized comparison of two-stent and provisional stenting techniques in patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions: the DEFINITION II trial.多中心、随机对照研究：复杂冠状动脉分叉病变患者中双支架技术与临时支架置入技术的比较——DEFINITION II试验

Eur Heart J. 2020 Jul 14;41(27):2523-2536. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa543.

A randomized trial of a dedicated bifurcation stent versus provisional stenting in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions.冠状动脉分叉病变治疗中专用分叉支架与预扩张支架的随机试验。

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Feb 17;65(6):533-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.031.

A Systematic Literature Review of Three Stenting Strategies for Bifurcation Lesions in Coronary Artery Disease.冠状动脉疾病分叉病变三种支架置入策略的系统文献综述

J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2019 Apr 26;6(2):95-105. doi: 10.36469/9746. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Bifurcation Techniques for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗分叉技术的系统评价和网状Meta分析

J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 20;11(12):e025394. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025394.

The European bifurcation club Left Main Coronary Stent study: a randomized comparison of stepwise provisional vs. systematic dual stenting strategies (EBC MAIN).欧洲分叉俱乐部左主干冠状动脉支架研究：分步临时与系统双支架策略的随机比较（EBC MAIN）。

Eur Heart J. 2021 Oct 1;42(37):3829-3839. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab283.

Clinical outcomes of the proximal optimisation technique (POT) in bifurcation stenting.分叉病变支架置入术中超近端优化技术（POT）的临床结果。

EuroIntervention. 2021 Dec 3;17(11):e910-e918. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01393.

Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary lesions: the 15 consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗分叉病变：来自欧洲分叉俱乐部的 15 项共识文件。

EuroIntervention. 2021 Mar 19;16(16):1307-1317. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00169.

Eur Heart J. 2020 Jul 14;41(27):2523-2536. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa543.

Randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV.临时边支支架置入术与双支架策略治疗累及大边支的真性冠状动脉分叉病变的随机对照研究：北欧-波罗的海分叉研究IV

Open Heart. 2020 Jan 19;7(1):e000947. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000947. eCollection 2020.

3-Year Outcomes of the DKCRUSH-V Trial Comparing DK Crush With Provisional Stenting for Left Main Bifurcation Lesions.比较DK Crush与临时支架置入术治疗左主干分叉病变的DKCRUSH-V试验的3年结果

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct 14;12(19):1927-1937. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.056. Epub 2019 Sep 11.

Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions).冠状动脉分叉病变双吻挤压术与临时支架置入术的临床结局：多中心随机DKCRUSH-II研究（冠状动脉分叉病变双吻挤压技术与临时支架置入技术的随机研究）的5年随访结果

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb;10(2):e004497. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004497.

The EBC TWO Study (European Bifurcation Coronary TWO): A Randomized Comparison of Provisional T-Stenting Versus a Systematic 2 Stent Culotte Strategy in Large Caliber True Bifurcations.EBC TWO研究（欧洲冠状动脉分叉病变研究之二）：大口径真性分叉病变中临时T型支架置入术与系统性双支架裤裙边技术的随机对照比较

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep;9(9). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003643.

Coronary bifurcation lesions treated with simple or complex stenting: 5-year survival from patient-level pooled analysis of the Nordic Bifurcation Study and the British Bifurcation Coronary Study.冠状动脉分叉病变单纯支架置入术与复杂支架置入术治疗：来自北欧分叉病变研究和英国分叉冠状动脉研究的患者水平汇总分析的 5 年生存结果。

Eur Heart J. 2016 Jun 21;37(24):1923-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw170. Epub 2016 May 8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验