• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Mixed-Methods Pilot Evaluation of Manhood 2.0, a Program to Reduce Unintended Pregnancy Among Young Men.一项针对“男子汉 2.0”项目的混合方法试点评估,该项目旨在减少年轻男性的意外怀孕。
Am J Mens Health. 2022 May-Jun;16(3):15579883221104895. doi: 10.1177/15579883221104895.
2
Attitudes, knowledge, and behavior regarding condom use in urban black adolescent males.城市黑人青少年男性在使用避孕套方面的态度、知识和行为。
Adolescence. 1994 Spring;29(113):13-26.
3
Associations between sexual and reproductive health knowledge, attitude and practice of partners and the occurrence of unintended pregnancy.伴侣的性与生殖健康知识、态度和实践与意外怀孕的发生之间的关联。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 4;10:1042879. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1042879. eCollection 2022.
4
"Our girls need to see a path to the future" --perspectives on sexual and reproductive health information among adolescent girls, guardians, and initiation counselors in Mulanje district, Malawi.“我们的女孩需要看到未来的道路”——马拉维木兰杰地区少女、监护人以及青春期启动顾问对性与生殖健康信息的看法。
Reprod Health. 2019 Jan 25;16(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0661-x.
5
Intensive Group Learning and On-Site Services to Improve Sexual and Reproductive Health Among Young Adults in Liberia: A Randomized Evaluation of HealthyActions.强化小组学习和现场服务以改善利比里亚青年的性健康和生殖健康:HealthyActions 的随机评估。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Sep 29;4(3):435-51. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00074. Print 2016 Sep 28.
6
Pilot Implementation of a User-Driven, Web-Based Application Designed to Improve Sexual Health Knowledge and Communication Among Young Zambians: Mixed Methods Study.用户驱动的基于网络的应用程序在改善赞比亚年轻人性健康知识和沟通方面的初步实施:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 7;24(7):e37600. doi: 10.2196/37600.
7
Perceived responsibility for pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection prevention among young African American men: An exploratory focus group study.美国年轻非裔男性对预防怀孕和性传播感染的责任感:一项探索性焦点小组研究。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018 Jun;16:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
8
Understanding men and programming sexuality education to meet their needs.了解男性并规划性教育以满足他们的需求。
Mens Reprod Health. 1988 Winter;2(1):4-7.
9
Attitudes toward sexual and reproductive health among adolescents and young people in urban and rural DR Congo.刚果民主共和国城乡青少年的性与生殖健康态度。
Reprod Health. 2018 May 4;15(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0517-4.
10
Impact of peer education on sexual health knowledge among adolescents and young persons in two North Western states of Nigeria.同伴教育对尼日利亚西北部两个州青少年性健康知识的影响。
Reprod Health. 2021 Oct 12;18(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01251-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies to develop an LGBTQIA+-inclusive adolescent sexual health program evaluation.制定一个包含LGBTQIA+群体的青少年性健康项目评估的策略。
Front Reprod Health. 2024 Mar 22;6:1327980. doi: 10.3389/frph.2024.1327980. eCollection 2024.
2
The male-focused marital relationship enrichment and sexual well-being interventions: A scoping review.以男性为重点的婚姻关系改善与性健康干预措施:一项范围综述。
Int J Reprod Biomed. 2024 Jan 25;21(12):975-984. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v21i12.15035. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of a Community-Based Gender Norms Program on Sexual Violence Perpetration by Adolescent Boys and Young Men: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.基于社区的性别规范项目对青少年男孩和年轻男性性暴力行为的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2028499. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.28499.
2
Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention: Meta-Analysis of Federally Funded Program Evaluations.青少年妊娠预防:联邦基金项目评估的荟萃分析。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Apr;109(4):e1-e8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304925. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
3
Racial Discrimination, Protective Processes, and Sexual Risk Behaviors Among Black Young Males.种族歧视、保护机制与黑人青年男性的性风险行为。
Arch Sex Behav. 2019 Feb;48(2):507-519. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1341-1. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
4
Program implementer perspectives replicating evidence based sexual reproductive health programs.项目实施者对基于证据的性与生殖健康项目进行复制的观点。
Eval Program Plann. 2019 Apr;73:80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
5
Does sex education before college protect students from sexual assault in college?大学前的性教育是否能保护大学生免受大学期间的性侵犯?
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 14;13(11):e0205951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205951. eCollection 2018.
6
Racism, African American Women, and Their Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Review of Historical and Contemporary Evidence and Implications for Health Equity.种族主义、非裔美国女性及其性与生殖健康:历史与当代证据综述及对健康公平的影响
Health Equity. 2018 Sep 24;2(1):249-259. doi: 10.1089/heq.2017.0045. eCollection 2018.
7
The adequacy of measures of gender roles attitudes: a review of current measures in omnibus surveys.性别角色态度测量方法的充分性:综合调查中现有测量方法的综述
Qual Quant. 2018;52(2):829-848. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0491-x. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
8
Contraceptive Method Choice Among Young Adults: Influence of Individual and Relationship Factors.年轻人避孕方法选择:个体和关系因素的影响。
J Sex Res. 2018 Nov-Dec;55(9):1106-1115. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2017.1419334. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
9
Teenage pregnancy prevention: the role of young men.青少年怀孕预防:年轻男性的作用。
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2017 Aug;29(4):393-398. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000510.
10
The Socioecology of Sexual and Reproductive Health Care Use Among Young Urban Minority Males.城市年轻少数族裔男性性与生殖健康护理利用的社会生态学
J Adolesc Health. 2017 Apr;60(4):402-410. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.11.014. Epub 2017 Jan 5.

一项针对“男子汉 2.0”项目的混合方法试点评估,该项目旨在减少年轻男性的意外怀孕。

A Mixed-Methods Pilot Evaluation of Manhood 2.0, a Program to Reduce Unintended Pregnancy Among Young Men.

机构信息

Child Trends, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA.

Promundo, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Mens Health. 2022 May-Jun;16(3):15579883221104895. doi: 10.1177/15579883221104895.

DOI:10.1177/15579883221104895
PMID:35723069
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9344189/
Abstract

One promising though understudied approach to addressing race/ethnic disparities in teen pregnancy rates is through sexual and reproductive health (SRH) programming for young men. This pilot study assessed the feasibility, quality, and preliminary efficacy of Manhood 2.0-a group-based, after-school SRH program for young Black and Latino men, which examines gender norms. This mixed-methods study describes program attendance and quality; participant experiences and engagement in the program; and changes in participant gender norms, knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, and social support. Quantitative data from baseline and post-intervention surveys ( = 51) were analyzed using paired -tests and McNemar's tests. Qualitative data from five post-intervention focus groups ( = 27) were transcribed, coded, and analyzed for themes. At baseline, participants were ages 15 to18 years ( = 16.4 years), 30% were Latino, 66% were Black, 34% ever had sex, and 44% of sexually active participants had sex without any contraceptive method or condom. Quality ratings by program observers were high. The majority of participants (61%) attended at least 75% of sessions, and 96% rated Manhood 2.0 as "very good" or "excellent." Pre-post comparisons showed increases in receipt of SRH information; contraception knowledge; positive attitudes about supporting partners in pregnancy prevention; self-efficacy in partner communication about sex; discussing program content with friends and family; and social competence and support. Focus group participants described benefits from the Manhood 2.0 content (i.e., full range of contraceptive methods, sexual consent, gender norms) and delivery (i.e., reflective discussion, nonjudgmental facilitators). Findings suggest that Manhood 2.0 is a promising SRH program for young men.

摘要

有一种有前景但研究不足的方法可以解决青少年怀孕率的种族/民族差异,那就是为年轻男性提供性健康和生殖健康(SRH)计划。这项试点研究评估了 Manhood 2.0 的可行性、质量和初步效果,这是一个针对年轻黑人和拉丁裔男性的基于小组的课后 SRH 计划,该计划检查了性别规范。这项混合方法研究描述了计划的出勤率和质量;参与者在计划中的经验和参与度;以及参与者的性别规范、知识、态度、自我效能感和社会支持的变化。基线和干预后调查的定量数据(n=51)使用配对检验和 McNemar 检验进行分析。从五个干预后焦点小组(n=27)转录、编码和分析定性数据以确定主题。在基线时,参与者的年龄为 15 至 18 岁(平均年龄为 16.4 岁),30%是拉丁裔,66%是黑人,34%曾经发生过性行为,44%有过性行为的参与者在没有任何避孕方法或避孕套的情况下发生性行为。项目观察员的质量评分很高。大多数参与者(61%)至少参加了 75%的课程,96%的人将 Manhood 2.0 评为“非常好”或“优秀”。前后比较显示,获得 SRH 信息、避孕知识、对支持伴侣预防怀孕的积极态度、与伴侣就性问题进行沟通的自我效能感、与朋友和家人讨论项目内容以及社交能力和支持方面都有所增加。焦点小组参与者描述了 Manhood 2.0 内容(即全面的避孕方法、性同意、性别规范)和交付(即反思性讨论、非评判性的促进者)的好处。研究结果表明,Manhood 2.0 是一个很有前途的年轻男性 SRH 计划。