Birky C W, Demko C A, Perlman P S, Strausberg R
Genetics. 1978 Aug;89(4):615-51. doi: 10.1093/genetics/89.4.615.
In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, previous studies on the inheritance of mitochondrial genes controlling antibiotic resistance have shown that some crosses produce a substantial number of uniparental zygotes, which transmit to their diploid progeny mitochondrial alleles from only one parent. In this paper, we show that uniparental zygotes are formed especially when one parent (majority parent) contributes substantially more mitochondrial DNA molecules to the zygote than does the other (minority) parent. Cellular contents of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) are increased in these experiments by treatment with cycloheximide, alpha-factor, or the uvsp5 nuclear mutation. In such a biased cross, some zygotes are uniparental for mitochondrial alleles from the majority parent, and the frequency of such zygotes increases with increasing bias. In two- and three-factor crosses the cap1, ery1, and oli1 loci behave coordinately, rather than independently; minority markers tend to be transmitted or lost as a unit, suggesting that the uniparental mechanism acts on entire mtDNA molecules rather than on individual loci. This rules out the possibility that uniparental inheritance can be explained by the conversion of minority markers to the majority alleles during recombination. Exceptions to the coordinate behavior of different loci can be explained by marker rescue via recombination. Uniparental inheritance is largely independent of the position of buds on the zygote. We conclude that it is due to the failure of minority markers to replicate in some zygotes, possibly involving the rapid enzymatic destruction of such markers. We have considered two general classes of mechanisms: (1) random selection of molecules for replication, as for example by competition for replicating sites on a membrane; and (2) differential marking of mtDNA molecules in the two parents, possibly by modification enzymes, followed by a mechanism that "counts" molecules and replicates only the majority type. These classes of models are distinguished genetically by the fact that the first predicts that the output frequency of a given allele among the progeny of a large number of zygotes will approximately equal the average input frequency of that allele, while the second class predicts that any input bias will be amplified in the output. The data suggest that bias amplification does occur. We hypothesize that maternal inheritance of mitochondrial or chloroplast genes in many organisms may depend upon a biased input of organelle DNA molecules, which usually favors the maternal parent, followed by failure of the minority (paternal) molecules to replicate in many or all zygotes.
在酿酒酵母中,先前关于控制抗生素抗性的线粒体基因遗传的研究表明,一些杂交会产生大量单亲合子,这些单亲合子仅将来自一个亲本的线粒体等位基因传递给其二倍体后代。在本文中,我们表明,单亲合子的形成尤其发生在一个亲本(多数亲本)向合子贡献的线粒体DNA分子比另一个(少数)亲本多得多的情况下。在这些实验中,通过用环己酰亚胺、α因子或uvsp5核突变处理,线粒体DNA(mtDNA)的细胞含量增加。在这种偏向杂交中,一些合子对于来自多数亲本的线粒体等位基因是单亲的,并且这种合子的频率随着偏向程度的增加而增加。在双因子和三因子杂交中,cap1、ery1和oli1位点表现出协同作用,而不是独立作用;少数标记倾向于作为一个整体被传递或丢失,这表明单亲机制作用于整个mtDNA分子,而不是单个位点。这排除了单亲遗传可以通过重组过程中少数标记向多数等位基因的转化来解释的可能性。不同位点协同行为的例外情况可以通过重组介导的标记拯救来解释。单亲遗传在很大程度上与合子上芽的位置无关。我们得出结论,这是由于少数标记在一些合子中无法复制,可能涉及此类标记的快速酶促破坏。我们考虑了两类一般机制:(1)随机选择分子进行复制,例如通过竞争膜上的复制位点;(2)对两个亲本中的mtDNA分子进行差异标记,可能是通过修饰酶,随后是一种“计数”分子并仅复制多数类型的机制。这两类模型在遗传上的区别在于,第一种预测在大量合子的后代中给定等位基因的输出频率将大致等于该等位基因的平均输入频率,而第二类预测任何输入偏向将在输出中被放大。数据表明确实发生了偏向放大。我们假设,许多生物体中线粒体或叶绿体基因的母系遗传可能取决于细胞器DNA分子的偏向输入,这种输入通常有利于母本,随后少数(父本)分子在许多或所有合子中无法复制。