Suppr超能文献

去中心化试验设计在改善罕见病研究方面可以发挥什么作用?

What role can decentralized trial designs play to improve rare disease studies?

机构信息

THREAD Research, 155 El Camino Real, Tustin, CA, 92780, USA.

Wicks Digital Health, Advantage House, Lichfield, WS13 6AQ, Staffordshire, UK.

出版信息

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Jun 20;17(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02388-5.

Abstract

People affected by rare diseases want to be involved in research and the search for new treatments. Randomized controlled trials remain the best way of finding new interventions, but many elements of traditional study design are not best suited for rare diseases. Barriers to patients and families include the use of specialist hospital sites for recruitment, requiring frequent site-based study visits for data collection, and a high burden of tests and outcome measures in research. While decentralized clinical trial (DCT) designs have been developed in some rare disease trials, changes necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic present an opportunity for them to become a standard approach. DCT approaches have been shown to be more resilient to changes in enrolment and attrition during COVID-19 than traditional designs and offer benefits in terms of patient burden, convenience, inclusion, and data quality. Digital tools such as wearable devices and electronic clinical outcome assessments may also provide more convenient and environmentally valid measures of how a condition affects the life of an individual in their regular environment (e.g. mobility around the home versus a hospital corridor). Digital solutions have greater ability to support language localization, accessibility, and may lead to increase access to global rare disease trials. In parallel, challenges exist, such as the technical support, the digital divide, ensuring high quality data, and delivering safe trials.

摘要

受罕见病影响的患者希望参与研究和寻找新的治疗方法。随机对照试验仍然是寻找新干预措施的最佳方法,但传统研究设计的许多要素并不最适合罕见病。患者和家属面临的障碍包括在专门的医院进行招募,需要频繁的现场研究访问以收集数据,以及研究中测试和结果测量的负担很重。虽然在一些罕见病试验中已经开发了分散临床试验(DCT)设计,但 COVID-19 大流行带来的变化为它们成为标准方法提供了机会。与传统设计相比,DCT 方法在 COVID-19 期间的入组和流失变化方面表现出更强的弹性,并在患者负担、便利性、包容性和数据质量方面提供了益处。可穿戴设备和电子临床结果评估等数字工具也可以更方便地、更真实地衡量疾病在个体日常生活环境中(例如,在家中移动与在医院走廊中移动)对其生活的影响。数字解决方案更有能力支持语言本地化和无障碍访问,并可能增加参与全球罕见病试验的机会。与此同时,还存在一些挑战,例如技术支持、数字鸿沟、确保高质量数据以及开展安全试验。

相似文献

2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs): A few ethical considerations.去中心化临床试验(DCTs):几点伦理考虑。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 15;10:1081150. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1081150. eCollection 2022.
10
Remote decentralized clinical trials: a new opportunity for laboratory medicine.远程去中心化临床试验:检验医学的新机遇。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Jan 5;61(8):1388-1394. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-1184. Print 2023 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
The New Normal in Clinical Trials: Decentralized Studies.临床试验的新常态:去中心化研究。
Ann Neurol. 2020 Nov;88(5):863-866. doi: 10.1002/ana.25892. Epub 2020 Sep 11.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验