Gamble Eoin, Heavin Ciara, Linehan Conor
School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
O'Rahilly Building, College Rd, University College, Cork, Cork University Business School, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 16;27:e62947. doi: 10.2196/62947.
Industry stakeholders, academic experts, and regulatory bodies emphasize the importance of prioritizing a patient-centered experience in clinical trials to enhance retention, adherence, and trial participation. Concurrently, there has been a notable rise in the adoption of technology-mediated decentralized methodologies for conducting clinical trials. Nonetheless, is a truly patient-centric approach being achieved? The shift to decentralized approaches risks prioritizing operational efficiency and remote data collection over the nuanced and diverse needs of participants. This raises critical questions about whether the current implementation of decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) fully aligns with the principles of patient centeredness.
Using a qualitative approach, our study aims to understand the perceptions of clinical research staff (CRS) of this transition and its impact on delivering a patient-centered experience.
A total of 15 CRS with experience of facilitating DCTs were interviewed, and transcripts were analyzed.
Our findings reveal 1 superordinate theme-the quality and frequency of interactions with patients and CRS are limited-and six main themes: (1) increasing demands of the CRS role, (2) creating difficulties for patients, (3) knowing the patient and understanding their experience, (4) impacts on forming and maintaining CRS-patient relationship, (5) difficulty in delivering desired level of support and care, and (6) perceived affects to conduct of a trial. While DCTs offer advantages in improving accessibility, they introduce new complexities that can negatively impact patient engagement, retention, and the CRS-patient relationship.
This study offers insights into the perspectives of CRS on delivering a patient-centered experience in DCTs. It highlights the benefits of DCTs alongside the challenges they present, emphasizing the need for additional support, training, streamlined technology, and resources to help CRS adapt to evolving trial dynamics. To fully realize the patient-centered potential of DCTs, technology and trial designers must recognize the complex interplay of factors shaping the patient experience. This requires collaboration with CRS and patients to address the diverse needs of all stakeholders, prioritizing the broader aspects of the patient experience beyond at-home convenience and data collection.
行业利益相关者、学术专家和监管机构强调在临床试验中优先考虑以患者为中心的体验对于提高留存率、依从性和试验参与度的重要性。与此同时,采用技术介导的去中心化方法进行临床试验的情况显著增加。然而,是否真的实现了以患者为中心的方法呢?向去中心化方法的转变有将运营效率和远程数据收集置于参与者细微且多样的需求之上的风险。这引发了关于当前去中心化临床试验(DCT)的实施是否完全符合以患者为中心原则的关键问题。
本研究采用定性方法,旨在了解临床研究人员(CRS)对这一转变的看法及其对提供以患者为中心体验的影响。
共采访了15名有促进DCT经验的CRS,并对访谈记录进行了分析。
我们的研究结果揭示了1个上级主题——与患者和CRS互动的质量和频率有限——以及6个主要主题:(1)CRS角色的需求增加,(2)给患者带来困难,(3)了解患者并理解他们的体验,(4)对形成和维持CRS - 患者关系的影响,(5)难以提供所需水平的支持和护理,(6)对试验进行的感知影响。虽然DCT在提高可及性方面具有优势,但它们引入了新的复杂性,可能对患者参与度、留存率以及CRS - 患者关系产生负面影响。
本研究提供了关于CRS在DCT中提供以患者为中心体验的观点的见解。它突出了DCT的益处以及它们带来的挑战,强调需要额外的支持、培训、简化的技术和资源来帮助CRS适应不断变化的试验动态。为了充分实现DCT以患者为中心的潜力,技术和试验设计者必须认识到塑造患者体验的各种因素之间的复杂相互作用。这需要与CRS和患者合作,以满足所有利益相关者的不同需求,将患者体验的更广泛方面置于家庭便利性和数据收集之上的优先位置。