Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001 Shanxi, China.
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022 Jun 11;2022:3185320. doi: 10.1155/2022/3185320. eCollection 2022.
To compare the merits and demerits of PEG-IFN-2a and PEG-IFN-2b for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB).
Clinical files from eighty-four CHB patients admitted to the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University between January 2018 and January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed and assigned to two groups: group 2a treated with PEG-IFN-2a and group 2b treated with PEG-IFN-2b. The clinical efficacy was compared between the above two arms, and the liver function (ALT, AST, HA, LN, and IV-C), HBV-DNA, HBsAg, HBeAg, and inflammatory factors (IFs, IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-) were tested at 12 weeks (T1), 24 weeks (T2), and 48 weeks (T3). The alterations of hemodynamics (SBP, DBP, MAP, and CVP), cardiac function (LVEF and BNP), and the incidence of adverse reactions (ARs) during treatment were recorded. Finally, the patients were followed up for 2 years to investigate the quality of life (QOL) as well as the positive seroconversion rate of HBsAg and HBeAg.
The overall response rate was similar in the two arms ( > 0.05). After treatment, the liver function, HBV-DNA, HBsAg, HBeAg, IFs, hemodynamics, and cardiac function were enormously improved ( < 0.05), with faster improvement in group 2b compared with group 2a ( < 0.05). The investigation of ARs identified notably lower incidence rates of alopecia, thrombocytopenia, and granulocytopenia in group 2a as compared to group 2b ( < 0.05). The prognostic follow-up results revealed no distinct difference in the QOL score and the positive seroconversion rate of HBsAg and HBeAg ( > 0.05); however, the quantitative results of HBV-DNA, HBsAg, and HBeAg in group 2b were lower than those in group 2a ( < 0.05).
Both PEG-IFN-2a and PEG-IFN-2b have excellent and stable therapeutic effects on HBeAg-positive CHB, among which PEG-IFN-2b renders a faster treatment process but higher side effects, which can provide valuable references when choosing a treatment plan for CHB.
比较聚乙二醇干扰素-α-2a(PEG-IFN-2a)和聚乙二醇干扰素-α-2b(PEG-IFN-2b)治疗乙型肝炎 e 抗原(HBeAg)阳性慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)的优缺点。
回顾性分析 2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 1 月期间山西医科大学第二医院收治的 84 例 CHB 患者的临床资料,将其分为 2a 组(接受 PEG-IFN-2a 治疗)和 2b 组(接受 PEG-IFN-2b 治疗)。比较两组的临床疗效,并在治疗后 12 周(T1)、24 周(T2)和 48 周(T3)时检测肝功能(ALT、AST、HA、LN 和 IV-C)、HBV-DNA、HBsAg、HBeAg 和炎症因子(IFs、IL-1、IL-6、IL-8 和 TNF-),记录治疗过程中血流动力学(SBP、DBP、MAP 和 CVP)、心功能(LVEF 和 BNP)的变化以及不良反应(AR)的发生率。最后对患者进行 2 年随访,调查 HBsAg 和 HBeAg 阳性血清转换率以及生活质量(QOL)。
两组的总体应答率相似(>0.05)。治疗后,两组肝功能、HBV-DNA、HBsAg、HBeAg、IFs、血流动力学和心功能均显著改善(<0.05),且 2b 组改善速度快于 2a 组(<0.05)。AR 调查发现 2a 组脱发、血小板减少和粒细胞减少的发生率明显低于 2b 组(<0.05)。预后随访结果显示,两组 QOL 评分和 HBsAg、HBeAg 阳性血清转换率无明显差异(>0.05);但 2b 组 HBV-DNA、HBsAg 和 HBeAg 的定量结果低于 2a 组(<0.05)。
PEG-IFN-2a 和 PEG-IFN-2b 对 HBeAg 阳性 CHB 均有良好且稳定的治疗效果,其中 PEG-IFN-2b 治疗过程更快,但副作用更高,在为 CHB 患者制定治疗方案时可提供有价值的参考。