Suppr超能文献

基于微信的自我管理和访谈管理员管理的中国婴幼儿喂养数据之间的一致性比较:一项测试-重测研究。

Comparison of the agreement between WeChat-based self-administered and interviewer-administered data on infant and young child feeding in China: A test-retest study.

机构信息

Department of Integrated Early Childhood Development, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

J Glob Health. 2022 Jun 20;12:11004. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.11004.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Measuring infant and young child feeding (IYCF) indicators is important in evaluating child health programs and making evidence-based decisions. With Internet and new media rapidly developing, communication apps such as WeChat (the most popular mobile social media platform in China) are widely used and can potentially be used as an alternative way to collect infant and young child feeding information. This study compares data agreement between a WeChat-based self-administered and an interviewer-administered survey on infant and young child feeding information.

METHODS

We recruited 297 mothers of children aged 6-23 months in Fenxi County, Shanxi Province, China. Using the Test-Retest method, we first collected data through a self-administered survey using a WeChat-based electronic questionnaire and asked 36 questions on breastfeeding and complementary feeding knowledge, practices, and information sources. We then conducted an interviewer-administered survey using the same questionnaire and compared the data agreement between the two survey methods during the same day. Cohen's kappa score (κ) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used for data agreement analysis for all 36 questions and six key IYCF indicators. The McNemar test was used to identify differences between the two survey methods for the six key indicators.

RESULTS

There was substantial or almost perfect agreement for 33 questions (κ/ICC>0.60), and slight or fair agreement for the other 3 questions (κ/ICC<0.40). Agreement of all six key IYCF indicators was substantial or almost perfect (κ = 0.78-0.94), while two indicators showed statistical differences between the two survey methods (P = 0.03 for "Minimum meal frequency" and P = 0.001 for "Minimum accepted diet"). Analysis of reasons for inconsistencies showed that 43.6% of all the inconsistencies were not caused by the self-administered survey method. The cost of the interviewer-administered survey was much higher than that of the self-administered survey: ¥45.9 (US$6.8) vs ¥19.7 (US$2.9) per questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

The WeChat-based self-administered method can be used for future data collection of infant and young child feeding information in China. Most of the questions and key indicators showed very good agreement without statistical differences between the two methods.

摘要

背景

衡量婴幼儿喂养(IYCF)指标对于评估儿童健康计划和做出基于证据的决策非常重要。随着互联网和新媒体的迅速发展,微信(中国最流行的移动社交媒体平台)等通讯应用程序得到了广泛应用,并且可能被用作收集婴幼儿喂养信息的替代方法。本研究比较了基于微信的自我管理和访谈者管理的婴幼儿喂养信息调查之间的数据一致性。

方法

我们在山西省汾西县招募了 297 名 6-23 个月龄儿童的母亲。使用测试-再测试方法,我们首先通过基于微信的电子问卷进行自我管理调查,收集了 36 个关于母乳喂养和补充喂养知识、实践和信息来源的问题。然后,我们使用相同的问卷进行了访谈者管理的调查,并在同一天比较了两种调查方法的数据一致性。我们使用 Cohen's kappa 评分(κ)和组内相关系数(ICC)分析了所有 36 个问题和 6 个关键 IYCF 指标的数据一致性。使用 McNemar 检验识别了 6 个关键指标在两种调查方法之间的差异。

结果

对于 33 个问题,存在实质性或几乎完美的一致性(κ/ICC>0.60),对于另外 3 个问题,存在轻微或公平的一致性(κ/ICC<0.40)。所有 6 个关键 IYCF 指标的一致性为实质性或几乎完美(κ=0.78-0.94),而两个指标在两种调查方法之间显示出统计学差异(“最低用餐频率”的 P=0.03,“最低接受饮食”的 P=0.001)。不一致原因的分析表明,所有不一致的 43.6%不是由自我管理调查方法引起的。访谈者管理调查的成本远远高于自我管理调查:每个问卷分别为 45.9 元(6.8 美元)和 19.7 元(2.9 美元)。

结论

基于微信的自我管理方法可用于中国未来的婴幼儿喂养信息收集。大多数问题和关键指标显示出非常好的一致性,两种方法之间没有统计学差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2573/9210156/733353a95394/jogh-12-11004-F1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验