Durham University, UK.
Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Sep;49(9):1344-1362. doi: 10.1177/01461672221100866. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
Attitude position and function often are discussed as though they are distinct aspects of attitudes, but scholars have become increasingly interested in how they may interface. We extend existing work showing that people view their positive attitudes as more self-defining than their negative attitudes (i.e., the positivity effect). All datasets support that the positivity effect emerged most strongly among high self-esteem individuals and was attenuated, eliminated, or even reversed among low self-esteem individuals. Furthermore, Study 4 uses a broad array of individual difference measures to triangulate that the higher self-enhancement motivation associated with high self-esteem, rather than merely the positive self-worth of high self-esteem people, is responsible for moderating the positivity effect. In sum, the present work establishes boundary conditions for an important phenomenon in the attitudes literature, develops understanding of the far-ranging implications of trait self-esteem, and illuminates the psychological motivations that connect attitude position and function.
态度的立场和功能常被视为态度的不同方面来讨论,但学者们越来越关注它们之间的相互关系。我们扩展了现有的研究,表明人们认为积极的态度比消极的态度更能定义自己(即积极性效应)。所有数据集都支持这样一种观点,即积极性效应在高自尊个体中表现最为强烈,而在低自尊个体中则减弱、消除甚至反转。此外,研究 4 使用了广泛的个体差异衡量标准来推断,与高自尊相关的更高的自我提升动机,而不仅仅是高自尊个体的积极自我价值感,是导致积极性效应调节的原因。总之,本研究为态度文献中的一个重要现象确定了边界条件,加深了对特质自尊深远影响的理解,并阐明了连接态度立场和功能的心理动机。