• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

窄径种植体单冠修复 1 年的边缘骨吸收和粉色美学评估:前瞻性临床研究。

Marginal Bone Loss and Pink Esthetic Evaluation of Narrow-Diameter Dental Implants for Single Crowns: 1-Year Prospective Clinical Study.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 May-Jun;37(3):515-524. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9051.

DOI:10.11607/jomi.9051
PMID:35727243
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were: (1) to quantify the marginal bone loss (MBL) of 3.3-mm narrow-diameter, bonelevel, titanium-zirconia (Ti-Zr) implants with two different surfaces in single restorations after a 1-year follow-up; (2) to analyze the combinations of different variables that may influence MBL; and (3) to record the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) value and its correlation with MBL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective longitudinal clinical study with a 1-year follow-up after crown placement. Two different implant surfaces (sandblasted acid-etched and modified sandblasted acid-etched) were used. All bone-level and bone level-tapered implants had a diameter of 3.3 mm. Different healing and prosthetic abutments were used. Clinical, radiographic, and photographic records were taken 6 months and 1 year after placement of the restorations, and the survival rate, MBL, PES, clinical parameters, and biologic and/or mechanical complications were assessed. The correlations between the variables and MBL were verified.

RESULTS

A total of 30 narrowdiameter implants were placed in 30 patients; 18 implants had a sandblasted acid-etched surface, and 12 implants had a modified sandblasted acid-etched surface. The measured MBL at 1 year after implant function had a mean value of -0.36 mm, ranging from 0 mm to -1.77 mm. There was no implant loss. A statistically significant relationship was observed between implant shape (design and length), implant placement level, healing abutment, prosthetic abutment size, gingival thickness, and MBL. The mean PES values recorded at the beginning and end of the study were 7.58 and 11.37, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Narrow-diameter implants showed reduced MBL values, with the surrounding tissues remaining stable after 1 year of follow-up. The MBL did not show different values on two implant surfaces. MBL does not seem to influence esthetic outcome.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是:(1)量化 3.3 毫米窄直径、骨水平、钛锆(Ti-Zr)种植体在单颗修复体中 1 年随访后的边缘骨丧失(MBL);(2)分析可能影响 MBL 的不同变量组合;(3)记录粉色美学评分(PES)值及其与 MBL 的相关性。

材料和方法

这是一项前瞻性纵向临床研究,在放置牙冠后进行为期 1 年的随访。使用两种不同的种植体表面(喷砂酸蚀和改良喷砂酸蚀)。所有骨水平和骨水平渐缩种植体的直径均为 3.3 毫米。使用了不同的愈合和修复体基台。在修复体放置后 6 个月和 1 年拍摄临床、放射和照片记录,并评估种植体的存活率、MBL、PES、临床参数以及生物和/或机械并发症。验证了变量与 MBL 之间的相关性。

结果

共将 30 颗窄直径种植体植入 30 名患者,其中 18 颗种植体采用喷砂酸蚀表面,12 颗种植体采用改良喷砂酸蚀表面。种植体功能 1 年后测量的 MBL 值平均值为-0.36 毫米,范围为 0 毫米至-1.77 毫米。无种植体丢失。种植体形状(设计和长度)、种植体放置水平、愈合基台、修复体基台尺寸、牙龈厚度与 MBL 之间存在统计学显著关系。研究开始和结束时记录的平均 PES 值分别为 7.58 和 11.37。

结论

窄直径种植体显示出较低的 MBL 值,在 1 年随访后周围组织保持稳定。两种种植体表面的 MBL 值没有差异。MBL 似乎不会影响美学效果。

相似文献

1
Marginal Bone Loss and Pink Esthetic Evaluation of Narrow-Diameter Dental Implants for Single Crowns: 1-Year Prospective Clinical Study.窄径种植体单冠修复 1 年的边缘骨吸收和粉色美学评估:前瞻性临床研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 May-Jun;37(3):515-524. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9051.
2
10-year Historical Prospective Cohort Study of Calcium Phosphate-Blasted Acid-Etched Titanium Implants Placed in Different Ridges.对置于不同牙槽嵴的磷酸钙喷砂酸蚀钛种植体进行的10年历史前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023 Jul-Aug;38(4):697-708. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10055.
3
The Use of Two-Piece Transmucosal Implants Designed with a Convergent Neck: A 6-Year Clinical Prospective Cohort Study Evaluating the Impact on Soft and Hard Tissues.双件黏膜下植入物的应用:采用会聚型颈部设计的 6 年临床前瞻性队列研究评估对软硬组织的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024 Jun 21(3):396-408. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10509.
4
Stability of contour augmentation and esthetic outcomes of implant-supported single crowns in the esthetic zone: 3-year results of a prospective study with early implant placement postextraction.种植体支持的单冠在美学区的轮廓增强的稳定性和美学效果:即刻种植后 3 年前瞻性研究的结果。
J Periodontol. 2011 Mar;82(3):342-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100408. Epub 2010 Sep 10.
5
Titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular-diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 1-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study.钛锆窄径与钛常规径种植体在前牙及前磨牙单冠修复中的应用:一项随机对照临床研究的 1 年结果。
J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Nov;40(11):1052-61. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12156. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
6
Immediate and flapless implant insertion and provisionalization using autogenous bone grafts in the esthetic zone: 5-year results.即刻无瓣种植及使用自体骨移植在美学区进行种植体植入和临时修复:5 年结果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Mar;29(3):320-327. doi: 10.1111/clr.13119.
7
Screw-retained internal connection zirconia CAD-CAM abutments in single implant reconstructions: Results of a 1-year prospective case series study.单颗种植体修复中螺丝固位的内连接氧化锆计算机辅助设计与制造基台:一项为期1年的前瞻性病例系列研究结果
J Prosthodont. 2023 Oct;32(8):679-688. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13674. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
8
[Clinical observation of the curative effect after 5-year follow-up of single tooth implant-supported restorations in the posterior region].[后牙单颗种植体支持修复体5年随访疗效的临床观察]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Oct 18;53(5):970-976. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.05.027.
9
Esthetically driven immediate provisionalization in the anterior zone: 5-year results from a prospective study evaluating 3.0-mm-diameter tapered implants.美学导向的前牙即刻临时修复:一项前瞻性研究评估 3.0 毫米直径锥形种植体 5 年的结果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jul 31;28(8):460. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05832-x.
10
A Multilevel Analysis of Platform-Switching Flapless Implants Placed at Tissue Level: 4-year Prospective Cohort Study.多水平分析:组织水平平台转移无瓣种植体的 4 年前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):330-341. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7541.

引用本文的文献

1
Survival rate and marginal bone loss in titanium vs titanium-zirconia single-unit narrow diameter implants. A systematic review and Meta-analysis of prospective studies.钛与钛锆单单位窄直径种植体的生存率和边缘骨丢失。前瞻性研究的系统评价和Meta分析。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2025 Jul 1;30(4):e499-e511. doi: 10.4317/medoral.27042.
2
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Bone Profile Around Dental Implants Placed in the Esthetic Zone.美学区种植体周围骨形态的临床与影像学评估
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Feb 5;18:591-601. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S503269. eCollection 2025.