Suppr超能文献

电子能量损失谱(EELS)实验中直接计数互补金属氧化物半导体(CMOS)相机和电荷耦合器件(CCD)相机检测限的比较。

Comparison of detection limits of direct-counting CMOS and CCD cameras in EELS experiments.

作者信息

Haruta Mitsutaka, Kikkawa Jun, Kimoto Koji, Kurata Hiroki

机构信息

Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan.

Research Center for Advanced Measurement and Characterization, National Institute for Materials Science, 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba 305-0044, Japan.

出版信息

Ultramicroscopy. 2022 Oct;240:113577. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2022.113577. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

Abstract

The noise performance and the detection limits of a direct-counting complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) K2 camera and a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera in electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) experiments were evaluated. In the case of a single spectrum acquired at the shortest dwell times (2.5 ms for K2 and 1 μs for CCD), the detection limit, defined as three times the standard deviation of the spectral noise (3σ), was very low (1 e/channel) in the counting-mode spectrum acquired with the K2 camera compared with that acquired with the CCD camera (5 e/channel). By contrast, the spectral noise of the K2 camera changed depending on the dwell time because of the multiple read-outs related to its fixed frame rate (400 fps). The spectral noise of the K2 camera was greater than that of the CCD camera when the dwell time was longer than ∼30 ms. Thus, the CCD camera was found to still be useful when detecting a very small number of electrons using a long acquisition time. In the case of an accumulated spectrum obtained by acquiring 10,000 spectra after subtracting the ultra-high-quality dark reference signal, the detection limits per read-out were ∼0.016 and ∼0.025 e/channel/read-out for the K2 and CCD cameras, respectively. Because both cameras have advantages and disadvantages with respect to their detection limit, speed, and dynamic range, their proper use is important.

摘要

对直接计数互补金属氧化物半导体(CMOS)K2相机和电荷耦合器件(CCD)相机在电子能量损失谱(EELS)实验中的噪声性能和检测限进行了评估。在以最短驻留时间采集单个光谱的情况下(K2相机为2.5 ms,CCD相机为1 μs),在K2相机采集的计数模式光谱中,定义为光谱噪声标准偏差三倍(3σ)的检测限非常低(1 e/通道),相比之下,CCD相机采集的检测限为5 e/通道。相比之下,由于K2相机与固定帧率(400 fps)相关的多次读出,其光谱噪声会随驻留时间而变化。当驻留时间长于约30 ms时,K2相机的光谱噪声大于CCD相机。因此,当使用较长采集时间检测极少量电子时,发现CCD相机仍然有用。在减去超高质量暗参考信号后采集10,000个光谱得到的累积光谱情况下,K2相机和CCD相机每次读出的检测限分别约为0.016和0.025 e/通道/读出。由于这两种相机在检测限、速度和动态范围方面都有优缺点,正确使用它们很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验