Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK.
Clinical Transplantation Laboratory, Viapath, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Hum Pathol. 2022 Sep;127:67-77. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.06.015. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
This study was aimed to examine the clinical utility and impact of the 2016 Banff criteria for acute antibody-mediated rejection (acute AMR) in patients with liver transplantation. Among adult patients with donor-specific antibody (DSA) assays performed between 2015 and 2020, cases with proved DSA (mean fluorescent index >2000) and matched liver biopsy available were reviewed. Among 55 patients identified, 28 (51%) had class I DSA, 45 (82%) had class II DSA and 18 (33%) had both. Mild, moderate and severe microvasculitis were observed in 11 (20%), 2 (4%) and 1 (2%) case, respectively. Diffuse immunoreactivity to C4d on portal microvascular endothelia was confirmed in 5 cases (9%), which met the criteria of definite (n = 2) or suspicious for acute AMR (n = 3). Cases of acute AMR more commonly had class I DSA (100% vs. 46%; p = 0.027) or both class I and II DSA (80% vs. 28%; p = 0.018) than cases of non-acute AMR. One case of pure acute AMR with veno-occlusion was successfully treated with plasma exchange. The remaining 4 cases had features of combined acute AMR/T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), and two progressed to ductopenic rejection within 3 weeks. In conclusion, only 9% of DSA-positive patients met the Banff criteria for acute AMR, necessitating careful morphological and immunohistochemical assessments of the allograft biopsies according to the proposed standards. Combined acute AMR/TCMR was more common than isolated acute AMR, and additional AMR in TCMR cases may be associated with rapid progression to ductopenic rejection.
本研究旨在探讨 2016 年 Banff 急性抗体介导排斥反应(acute AMR)标准在肝移植患者中的临床实用性和影响。在 2015 年至 2020 年期间进行供体特异性抗体(DSA)检测的成年患者中,回顾了有明确 DSA(平均荧光指数>2000)和匹配肝活检的病例。在确定的 55 例患者中,28 例(51%)有 I 类 DSA,45 例(82%)有 II 类 DSA,18 例(33%)有 I 类和 II 类 DSA。分别有 11 例(20%)、2 例(4%)和 1 例(2%)患者出现轻度、中度和重度微血管炎。5 例(9%)患者门脉微血管内皮细胞弥散性 C4d 免疫反应阳性,符合明确(n=2)或疑似急性 AMR(n=3)标准。急性 AMR 病例更常见于 I 类 DSA(100% vs. 46%;p=0.027)或 I 类和 II 类 DSA 均阳性(80% vs. 28%;p=0.018)。1 例单纯急性 AMR 合并静脉阻塞经血浆置换成功治疗。其余 4 例为急性 AMR/T 细胞介导排斥反应(TCMR)混合病例,其中 2 例在 3 周内进展为胆管消失性排斥反应。总之,仅有 9%的 DSA 阳性患者符合急性 AMR 的 Banff 标准,需要根据提出的标准仔细评估移植物活检的形态学和免疫组织化学特征。急性 AMR/TCMR 混合病例比单纯急性 AMR 更常见,TCMR 病例中其他 AMR 可能与快速进展为胆管消失性排斥反应有关。