Suppr超能文献

精神症状个体的情绪加工量表的心理计量特性及简短 15 项版本的开发。

Psychometric properties of the emotional processing scale in individuals with psychiatric symptoms and the development of a brief 15-item version.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden.

Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 21;12(1):10456. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14712-x.

Abstract

The 25-item Emotional Processing Scale (EPS) can be used with clinical populations, but there is little research on its psychometric properties (factor structure, test-retest reliability, and validity) in individuals with psychiatric symptoms. We administered the EPS-25 to a large sample of people (N = 512) with elevated psychiatric symptoms. We used confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate three a priori models from previous research and then evaluated discriminant and convergent validity against measures of alexithymia (Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionaire-9), and anxiety symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7). None of the a priori models achieved acceptable fit, and subsequent exploratory factor analysis did not yield a clear factor solution for the 25 items. A 5-factor model did, however, achieve acceptable fit when we retained only 15 items, and this solution was replicated in a validation sample. Convergent and discriminant validity for this revised version, the EPS-15, was r = - 0.19 to 0.46 vs. TAS-20, r = 0.07- 0.25 vs. PHQ-9, and r = 0.29- 0.57 vs. GAD-7. Test-retest reliability was acceptable (ICC = 0.73). This study strengthens the case for the reliability and validity of the 5-factor structure of the EPS but suggest that only 15 items should be retained. Future studies should further examine the reliability and validity of the EPS-15.

摘要

情绪加工量表(EPS)共有 25 个项目,可用于临床人群,但针对具有精神症状的个体,其心理测量学特性(因子结构、重测信度和效度)的研究较少。我们对具有较高精神症状的大量个体(N=512)施测了 EPS-25。我们采用验证性因子分析来评估先前研究中的三个先验模型,然后根据述情障碍量表(多伦多述情障碍量表-20)、抑郁症状(患者健康问卷-9)和焦虑症状(广泛性焦虑障碍-7)对区分效度和聚合效度进行评估。没有一个先验模型具有可接受的拟合度,随后的探索性因子分析也未能为 25 个项目提供清晰的因子解决方案。但是,当我们仅保留 15 个项目时,5 因素模型具有可接受的拟合度,并且在验证样本中也得到了复制。对于这个经过修订的版本(EPS-15),其收敛和区分效度为 TAS-20 的 r 值为-0.19 到 0.46,与 PHQ-9 的 r 值为 0.07 到 0.25,与 GAD-7 的 r 值为 0.29 到 0.57。重测信度可接受(ICC=0.73)。这项研究增强了 EPS 五因素结构的可靠性和有效性的证据,但表明仅应保留 15 个项目。未来的研究应进一步检验 EPS-15 的可靠性和有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6dd/9213431/68499b1f73ce/41598_2022_14712_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验