• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神症状个体的情绪加工量表的心理计量特性及简短 15 项版本的开发。

Psychometric properties of the emotional processing scale in individuals with psychiatric symptoms and the development of a brief 15-item version.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 171 65, Stockholm, Sweden.

Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 21;12(1):10456. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14712-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-14712-x
PMID:35729355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9213431/
Abstract

The 25-item Emotional Processing Scale (EPS) can be used with clinical populations, but there is little research on its psychometric properties (factor structure, test-retest reliability, and validity) in individuals with psychiatric symptoms. We administered the EPS-25 to a large sample of people (N = 512) with elevated psychiatric symptoms. We used confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate three a priori models from previous research and then evaluated discriminant and convergent validity against measures of alexithymia (Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionaire-9), and anxiety symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7). None of the a priori models achieved acceptable fit, and subsequent exploratory factor analysis did not yield a clear factor solution for the 25 items. A 5-factor model did, however, achieve acceptable fit when we retained only 15 items, and this solution was replicated in a validation sample. Convergent and discriminant validity for this revised version, the EPS-15, was r = - 0.19 to 0.46 vs. TAS-20, r = 0.07- 0.25 vs. PHQ-9, and r = 0.29- 0.57 vs. GAD-7. Test-retest reliability was acceptable (ICC = 0.73). This study strengthens the case for the reliability and validity of the 5-factor structure of the EPS but suggest that only 15 items should be retained. Future studies should further examine the reliability and validity of the EPS-15.

摘要

情绪加工量表(EPS)共有 25 个项目,可用于临床人群,但针对具有精神症状的个体,其心理测量学特性(因子结构、重测信度和效度)的研究较少。我们对具有较高精神症状的大量个体(N=512)施测了 EPS-25。我们采用验证性因子分析来评估先前研究中的三个先验模型,然后根据述情障碍量表(多伦多述情障碍量表-20)、抑郁症状(患者健康问卷-9)和焦虑症状(广泛性焦虑障碍-7)对区分效度和聚合效度进行评估。没有一个先验模型具有可接受的拟合度,随后的探索性因子分析也未能为 25 个项目提供清晰的因子解决方案。但是,当我们仅保留 15 个项目时,5 因素模型具有可接受的拟合度,并且在验证样本中也得到了复制。对于这个经过修订的版本(EPS-15),其收敛和区分效度为 TAS-20 的 r 值为-0.19 到 0.46,与 PHQ-9 的 r 值为 0.07 到 0.25,与 GAD-7 的 r 值为 0.29 到 0.57。重测信度可接受(ICC=0.73)。这项研究增强了 EPS 五因素结构的可靠性和有效性的证据,但表明仅应保留 15 个项目。未来的研究应进一步检验 EPS-15 的可靠性和有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6dd/9213431/68499b1f73ce/41598_2022_14712_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6dd/9213431/68499b1f73ce/41598_2022_14712_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6dd/9213431/68499b1f73ce/41598_2022_14712_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the emotional processing scale in individuals with psychiatric symptoms and the development of a brief 15-item version.精神症状个体的情绪加工量表的心理计量特性及简短 15 项版本的开发。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 21;12(1):10456. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14712-x.
2
[The alexithymia questionnaire for children (AQC): Psychometric properties in a sample of 105 adolescents hospitalized in an adolescent psychiatric department].[儿童述情障碍问卷(AQC):在青少年精神科住院的105名青少年样本中的心理测量学特性]
Encephale. 2018 Apr;44(2):148-151. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
3
[Factorial analysis and internal consistency of the French version of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS 20), in obese women].[肥胖女性中多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS 20)法语版的因子分析与内部一致性]
Encephale. 2002 Jul-Aug;28(4):277-82.
4
Improving the measurement of alexithymia in autistic adults: a psychometric investigation and refinement of the twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale.改善自闭症成年人的述情障碍测量:多伦多述情障碍量表 20 项的心理计量学研究与改进。
Mol Autism. 2021 Mar 2;12(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13229-021-00427-9.
5
Improving the measurement of alexithymia in autistic adults: a psychometric investigation of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale and generation of a general alexithymia factor score using item response theory.改善自闭症成年人的述情障碍测量:多伦多述情障碍量表 20 项版本的心理计量学研究及使用项目反应理论生成一般述情障碍因子分数。
Mol Autism. 2021 Aug 10;12(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13229-021-00463-5.
6
[Validity of the BVAQ: a study in eating disorder patients and controls].[BVAQ的效度:一项针对饮食失调患者及对照组的研究]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):464-73. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95461-9.
7
Cross validation of the factor structure of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: an Italian multicenter study.20项多伦多述情障碍量表因素结构的交叉验证:一项意大利多中心研究
J Psychosom Res. 1996 Dec;41(6):551-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(96)00228-0.
8
[Validation of the German version of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in normal persons and psychiatric patients].[20项多伦多述情障碍量表德文版在正常人和精神科患者中的效度验证]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1996 Jan;46(1):23-8.
9
Psychometric assessment of the 10-item Thai version of the Experience in Close Relationship-Revised for Adolescents (ECR-R-10-AD).青少年亲密关系体验修订版 10 项量表(ECR-R-10-AD)的 10 项泰文版心理计量评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 11;14(1):13408. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64437-2.
10
The reliability, validity and factorial structure of the Swahili version of the 7-item generalized anxiety disorder scale (GAD-7) among adults living with HIV from Kilifi, Kenya.肯尼亚基利菲地区感染艾滋病毒的成年人中,斯瓦希里语版7项广泛性焦虑症量表(GAD-7)的信度、效度和因子结构。
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 28;19:62. doi: 10.1186/s12991-020-00312-4. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Internet-based emotional awareness and expression therapy for somatic symptom disorder: A randomized controlled trial.基于互联网的情绪意识和表达疗法治疗躯体症状障碍:一项随机对照试验。
J Psychosom Res. 2022 Dec;163:111068. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.111068. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
2
Internet-Administered Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy for Somatic Symptom Disorder With Centralized Symptoms: A Preliminary Efficacy Trial.针对具有集中症状的躯体症状障碍的互联网管理情绪意识与表达疗法:一项初步疗效试验。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 12;12:620359. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.620359. eCollection 2021.
3
Emotion regulation.
情绪调节。
Emotion. 2020 Feb;20(1):1-9. doi: 10.1037/emo0000703.
4
Emotional Processing In Patients with Ischemic Heart Diseases.缺血性心脏病患者的情绪处理
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Sep 20;6(9):1627-1632. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.325. eCollection 2018 Sep 25.
5
Changes in Emotion Processing following Brief Augmented Psychodynamic Interpersonal Therapy for Functional Neurological Symptoms.功能性神经症状简短强化心理动力人际治疗后情绪加工的变化
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2018 May;46(3):350-366. doi: 10.1017/S1352465817000807. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
6
Internet-based affect-focused psychodynamic therapy for social anxiety disorder: A randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.基于互联网的以情绪为焦点的精神动力疗法治疗社交焦虑障碍:一项随机对照试验,随访 2 年。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2017 Dec;54(4):351-360. doi: 10.1037/pst0000147.
7
Emotional Processing in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.物质使用障碍和创伤后应激障碍患者的情绪加工
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2017;15(4):900-918. doi: 10.1007/s11469-016-9727-6. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
8
Anxiety, emotional processing and depression in people with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者的焦虑、情绪处理与抑郁
BMC Neurol. 2017 Feb 23;17(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12883-017-0803-8.
9
Emotion processing and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: A cross-sectional comparison of patients and healthy controls.情绪加工与心因性非癫痫性发作:患者与健康对照的横断面比较
Seizure. 2015 Jul;29:4-10. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
10
Psychosocial predictors of irritable bowel syndrome diagnosis and symptom severity.肠易激综合征诊断和症状严重程度的心理社会预测因素。
J Psychosom Res. 2013 Nov;75(5):467-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Aug 9.