• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较横韧带间隙测量值和“λ征”在鉴别慢性外侧踝关节不稳中潜在下胫腓联合分离的诊断价值:一项对188例患者的横断面研究

Comparison of the diagnostic value of measurements of transverse syndesmotic interval and 'lambda sign' in distinguishing latent syndesmotic diastasis in chronic lateral ankle instability: a cross-sectional study of 188 cases.

作者信息

Zhao Yuqing, Chen Wen, Su Tong, Zhou Guangjin, Jiang Dong, Yuan Huishu

机构信息

Radiology Department, Peking University Third Hospital, No.49 North Garden Road, Haidian, Beijing, 100191, China.

Department of Sports Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Peking University Third Hospital. Institute of Sports Medicine of Peking University, No.49 North Garden Road, Haidian, Beijing, 100191, China.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Apr;143(4):2037-2045. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04500-7. Epub 2022 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-022-04500-7
PMID:35729435
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) could accompany with latent syndesmotic diastasis (LSD), which is difficult to distinguish before surgery. Tibiofibular interval width and extravasation of joint fluid ('lambda sign') on MRI are widely used in the diagnosis of syndesmotic injury, but the reliability of these methods in distinguishing the associated LSD in CLAI was rarely studied. Our objective was to compare the diagnostic value of the measurement of the transverse tibiofibular interval and 'lambda sign' on MRI in distinguishing LSD in CLAI and to investigate the radiological predictor that best matched the intraoperatively measured syndesmotic width.

METHODS

138 CLAI patients undergoing arthroscopy in our institute from March 2017 to June 2020 were enrolled (CLAI group). Anterior space width (ASW) and posterior space width (PSW) at 10 mm layer above tibial articular and fluid height above tibial articular surface (FH) were measured on preoperative MRI. The same parameters were measured on MRI of 50 healthy volunteers as control group. At arthroscopy, syndesmotic width was measured and the patients were divided into arthroscopic widening (AW) and arthroscopic normal (AN) subgroup taking 2 mm as critical value. The CLAI group was compared with the control group to explore the interval changes related to CLAI. The AW and AN subgroups were compared to explore the potential diagnostic indicators and reference values for the LSD.

RESULTS

All parameters showed significant difference between CLAI group and control group (p < 0.05), but only PSW (p = 0.004) showed significant difference between AW and AN subgroups other than FH (p = 0.461). Only PSW was involved in formula of multiple-factor analysis (p = 0.005; OR, 1.819; 95%CI, 1.196-2.767). ROC analysis showed critical value of PSW was 3.8 mm (sensitivity, 66%; specificity, 66%; accuracy, 66.7%), while accuracy of lambda sign was 41.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Transverse tibiofibular interval measurements were more reliable than the 'lambda sign' in distinguishing associated LSD in CLAI patients. The PSW ≥ 3.8 mm could be a predictor of syndesmotic diastasis.

摘要

引言

慢性外侧踝关节不稳(CLAI)可能伴有潜在的下胫腓联合分离(LSD),术前难以鉴别。MRI上胫腓间隙宽度和关节液外渗(“λ征”)被广泛用于诊断下胫腓联合损伤,但这些方法在鉴别CLAI相关LSD中的可靠性鲜有研究。我们的目的是比较MRI上测量胫腓横间隙和“λ征”对鉴别CLAI中LSD的诊断价值,并探究与术中测量的下胫腓联合宽度最匹配的影像学预测指标。

方法

纳入我院2017年3月至2020年6月期间接受关节镜检查的138例CLAI患者(CLAI组)。在术前MRI上测量胫骨关节面上方10mm层面的前间隙宽度(ASW)和后间隙宽度(PSW)以及胫骨关节面上方的液体高度(FH)。测量50名健康志愿者的MRI作为对照组,测量相同参数。在关节镜检查时,测量下胫腓联合宽度,并以2mm为临界值将患者分为关节镜下增宽(AW)和关节镜下正常(AN)亚组。将CLAI组与对照组进行比较,以探讨与CLAI相关的间隙变化。比较AW和AN亚组,以探索LSD的潜在诊断指标和参考值。

结果

CLAI组与对照组之间所有参数均有显著差异(p<0.05),但除FH(p=0.461)外,AW和AN亚组之间仅PSW(p=0.004)有显著差异。多因素分析公式中仅涉及PSW(p=0.005;OR,1.819;95%CI,1.196-2.767)。ROC分析显示PSW的临界值为3.8mm(敏感性,66%;特异性,66%;准确性,66.7%),而“λ征”的准确性为41.3%。

结论

在鉴别CLAI患者相关LSD方面,胫腓横间隙测量比“λ征”更可靠。PSW≥3.8mm可能是下胫腓联合分离的一个预测指标。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the diagnostic value of measurements of transverse syndesmotic interval and 'lambda sign' in distinguishing latent syndesmotic diastasis in chronic lateral ankle instability: a cross-sectional study of 188 cases.比较横韧带间隙测量值和“λ征”在鉴别慢性外侧踝关节不稳中潜在下胫腓联合分离的诊断价值:一项对188例患者的横断面研究
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Apr;143(4):2037-2045. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04500-7. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
2
Arthroscopic characterization of syndesmotic instability in the coronal plane: Exactly what measurement matters?关节镜下冠状面下胫腓联合不稳定的特征:到底什么测量指标重要?
Injury. 2021 Jul;52(7):1964-1970. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.030. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
3
The lambda sign: a new radiographic indicator of latent syndesmosis instability.拉姆达征:潜在下胫腓联合不稳定的一种新的影像学指标。
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Sep;35(9):903-8. doi: 10.1177/1071100714543646. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
4
Effect of Arthroscopically Confirmed Syndesmotic Widening on Outcome Following Isolated Broström Operation for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability.关节镜证实的下胫腓联合增宽对单纯Broström手术治疗慢性外侧踝关节不稳疗效的影响
Foot Ankle Int. 2023 Apr;44(4):270-278. doi: 10.1177/10711007231153388. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
5
Deltoid Ligament and Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury in Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation at 3T and Comparison with Arthroscopy.慢性外侧踝关节不稳中三角韧带和胫腓下联合损伤:3T磁共振成像评估及与关节镜检查对比
Korean J Radiol. 2015 Sep-Oct;16(5):1096-103. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.5.1096. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
6
The effect of ankle distraction on arthroscopic evaluation of syndesmotic instability: A cadaveric study.踝关节撑开对下胫腓联合不稳定关节镜评估的影响:一项尸体研究。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2017 Dec;50:16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
7
Arthroscopic assessment of syndesmotic instability: Are we pulling correctly in the coronal plane?关节镜评估下胫腓联合不稳定:我们在冠状面上的牵引是否正确?
Foot Ankle Surg. 2023 Jan;29(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2022.09.007. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
8
Range of Normal and Abnormal Syndesmotic Measurements Using Weightbearing CT.使用负重 CT 评估距腓联合的正常和异常测量范围。
Foot Ankle Int. 2019 Dec;40(12):1430-1437. doi: 10.1177/1071100719866831. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
9
The distal tibiofibular joint effusion may be a reliable index for diagnosing the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis instability in ankle.下胫腓联合远侧关节积液可能是诊断踝关节下胫腓联合不稳定的可靠指标。
Skeletal Radiol. 2024 Feb;53(2):329-338. doi: 10.1007/s00256-023-04395-4. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
10
Utility of WBCT to Diagnose Syndesmotic Instability in Patients With Weber B Lateral Malleolar Fractures.WBCT 对 Weber B 型外踝骨折患者下胫腓联合不稳定的诊断价值。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Feb 1;30(3):e423-e433. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00566.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistical shape model-based tibiofibular assessment of syndesmotic ankle lesions using weight-bearing CT.基于统计形状模型的负重 CT 对下胫腓联合踝关节损伤的评估。
J Orthop Res. 2022 Dec;40(12):2873-2884. doi: 10.1002/jor.25318. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
2
Advances in the Surgical Management of Ankle Fractures.踝关节骨折手术治疗的进展
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2019 Nov 11;4(4):2473011419888505. doi: 10.1177/2473011419888505. eCollection 2019 Oct.
3
Does the orientation of syndesmosis fixative device affect the immediate reduction of the distal tibiofibular joint?
固定装置的方向是否会影响下胫腓联合的即刻复位?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Nov;142(11):3213-3220. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04073-x. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
4
Clinical outcomes of isolated acute instability of the syndesmosis treated with arthroscopy and percutaneous suture-button fixation.关节镜下经皮缝合钉固定治疗单纯下胫腓联合急性不稳定的临床疗效。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Sep;141(9):1567-1574. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03813-3. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
5
Comparison of External Torque to Axial Loading in Detecting 3-Dimensional Displacement of Syndesmotic Ankle Injuries.比较外扭矩与轴向加载在诊断下胫腓联合损伤三维位移中的作用。
Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Oct;41(10):1256-1268. doi: 10.1177/1071100720936596. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
6
Arthroscopic Grading of Injuries of the Inferior Tibiofibular Syndesmosis.下胫腓联合损伤的关节镜分级
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Nov-Dec;57(6):1125-1129. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
7
Templating of Syndesmotic Ankle Lesions by Use of 3D Analysis in Weightbearing and Nonweightbearing CT.在负重和非负重 CT 下使用 3D 分析对下胫腓联合病变进行模板定位。
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Dec;39(12):1487-1496. doi: 10.1177/1071100718791834. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
8
Weight-bearing cone beam CT scans in the foot and ankle.足部和踝关节的负重锥形束CT扫描
EFORT Open Rev. 2018 May 21;3(5):278-286. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170066. eCollection 2018 May.
9
Diagnostic imaging of ankle syndesmosis injuries: A general review.踝关节下胫腓联合损伤的诊断性影像学:综述
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018 Apr;62(2):159-168. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12708. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
10
Weightbearing Computed Tomography of the Foot and Ankle: Emerging Technology Topical Review.足部和踝关节负重计算机断层扫描:新兴技术专题综述
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Mar;39(3):376-386. doi: 10.1177/1071100717740330. Epub 2017 Nov 24.