• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于计划行为理论的低健康素养人群慢性病干预措施的系统评价方案。

Theory of planned behaviour-based interventions in chronic diseases among low health-literacy population: protocol for a systematic review.

机构信息

Christian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, India.

University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 21;11(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02006-2.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-022-02006-2
PMID:35729634
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9210335/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health behaviour can change outcomes in both healthy and unhealthy populations and are particularly useful in promoting compliance to treatment and maintaining fidelity to care seeking and follow-up options in chronic diseases. Interventions to change health behaviour based on psychological theory are more often successful than those without any underlying theory. The theory of planned behaviour (TPB) is one such psychological theory which had been found to predict human behaviour with respect to disease prevention and when applied to interventions can change the outcomes of diseases. Most of the research evidence of TPB-based interventions have been from developed world. Evidence is required whether TPB-based interventions can be applied and works in low-resource, low health-literacy settings of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

METHODS

The protocol has been developed as per PRISMA-P guidelines and incorporates PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcomes) framework for describing the methodology. Population above 18 years of age and having any chronic disease (as defined for this systematic review) will be selected, while any health or educational intervention based on constructs of TPB will be included. Comparison will be with non-TPB-based interventions or treatment as usual without any intervention, and the primary outcome will be the behaviour change effected by the TPB-based intervention. Intervention studies will be considered, and relevant databases like MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and ProQuest will be explored. Data extraction will done in a standardised form, and risk-of-bias assessment will be done using the Cochrane Collaboration's tools for such assessment. Narrative synthesis of the selected studies will be done to draw the conclusions, and meta-analysis will be done to calculate the effect estimates with I-squared statistics to describe the heterogeneity.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review will provide new evidence on fidelity and effectiveness of the TPB-based interventions among chronic disease patients from low health literacy, resource-poor background. It will inform of how to plan and use such interventions to change health behaviour in chronic disease patients, particularly in LMIC settings.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42018104890 .

摘要

背景

健康行为可以改变健康人群和不健康人群的结局,在促进治疗依从性和维持慢性病寻求和随访选择的忠实性方面特别有用。基于心理理论的健康行为干预比没有任何潜在理论的干预更成功。计划行为理论(TPB)就是这样一种心理理论,它被发现可以预测人类在疾病预防方面的行为,并且当应用于干预时,可以改变疾病的结局。基于 TPB 的干预措施的大多数研究证据都来自发达国家。需要有证据表明,基于 TPB 的干预措施是否可以在资源匮乏、健康素养低、中低收入国家(LMICs)的低资源、低健康素养环境中应用和发挥作用。

方法

该方案是根据 PRISMA-P 指南制定的,并纳入了 PICO(人群、干预、比较、结局)框架来描述方法。将选择年龄在 18 岁以上且患有任何慢性病(为本系统评价定义)的人群,同时纳入基于 TPB 结构的任何健康或教育干预措施。将与非 TPB 为基础的干预措施或不进行任何干预的常规治疗进行比较,主要结局是 TPB 为基础的干预措施所产生的行为改变。将考虑干预研究,并探索相关数据库,如 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 ProQuest。将以标准化表格形式提取数据,并使用 Cochrane 协作工具进行风险偏倚评估。将对选定的研究进行叙述性综合,以得出结论,并进行荟萃分析,以计算效应估计值,并用 I 平方统计量描述异质性。

讨论

本系统评价将提供新的证据,证明低健康素养、资源匮乏背景下的慢性病患者基于 TPB 的干预措施的忠实性和有效性。它将说明如何在慢性病患者中计划和使用这种干预措施来改变健康行为,特别是在 LMIC 环境中。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD42018104890。

相似文献

1
Theory of planned behaviour-based interventions in chronic diseases among low health-literacy population: protocol for a systematic review.基于计划行为理论的低健康素养人群慢性病干预措施的系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 21;11(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02006-2.
2
A systematic review of the theory of planned behaviour interventions for chronic diseases in low health-literacy settings.低健康素养环境下针对慢性病的计划行为理论干预措施的系统评价。
J Glob Health. 2023 Sep 8;13:04079. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04079.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Effect of implementation interventions on nurses' behaviour in clinical practice: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression protocol.实施干预措施对护士临床行为影响的系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归方案
Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 5;8(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1227-x.
6
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
A Systematic Review of Genetic Testing and Lifestyle Behaviour Change: Are We Using High-Quality Genetic Interventions and Considering Behaviour Change Theory?基因检测与生活方式行为改变的系统评价:我们是否采用了高质量的遗传干预措施并考虑了行为改变理论?
Lifestyle Genom. 2018;11(1):49-63. doi: 10.1159/000488086. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
9
Adapted motivational interviewing for brief healthcare consultations: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment fidelity in real-world evaluations of behaviour change counselling.改编版动机性访谈应用于简短医疗保健咨询:真实环境下行为改变咨询治疗效果评估中系统评价和元分析的治疗保真度研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 30;9(7):e028417. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028417.
10
The effectiveness of information and communication technology-based psychological interventions for paediatric chronic pain: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis and intervention content analysis.基于信息通信技术的儿童慢性疼痛心理干预的有效性:系统评价、荟萃分析和干预内容分析方案
Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 18;5(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0350-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthcare-seeking intentions of middle-aged and elderly individuals with critical diseases: an expanded TPB model in the post-pandemic era.患有重大疾病的中老年人的就医意愿:大流行后时代的扩展计划行为理论模型
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 8;15(1):28996. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12860-4.
2
A multistage research on factors influencing and active learning intervention on health literacy of community-residing elderly adults in Nanjing.南京社区老年人健康素养影响因素及主动学习干预的多阶段研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 10;25(1):2149. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23394-9.
3
Effectiveness of a theory-based educational intervention on enhancing milk donation behavior: a cluster randomized controlled trial.基于理论的教育干预对促进母乳捐赠行为的有效性:一项整群随机对照试验。
Int Breastfeed J. 2025 Mar 22;20(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13006-025-00711-x.
4
The mediating role of health literacy in the relationship between self-care and planned behavior against Covid-19.健康素养在自我保健与新冠疫情防范计划行为关系中的中介作用。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jun 20;24(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09513-8.
5
Sustainable Implementation of Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Clinics for Diabetes Management in Primary Healthcare Centers: A Qualitative Study.可持续实施医师-药剂师合作诊所以管理基层医疗中心的糖尿病:一项定性研究。
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2024 Sep;14(3):974-986. doi: 10.1007/s44197-024-00244-2. Epub 2024 May 23.
6
A systematic review of the theory of planned behaviour interventions for chronic diseases in low health-literacy settings.低健康素养环境下针对慢性病的计划行为理论干预措施的系统评价。
J Glob Health. 2023 Sep 8;13:04079. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04079.
7
An application of a series of theory-based educational intervention based on the health belief model on skin cancer prevention behaviors in female high school students.基于健康信念模型的一系列理论教育干预措施在高中女生皮肤癌预防行为中的应用。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 18;9(6):e17209. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17209. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Pharmacist Intervention in Portuguese Older Adult Care.药剂师对葡萄牙老年人护理的干预。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Sep 22;10(10):1833. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10101833.

本文引用的文献

1
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.《可信系统评价的更新指南:干预措施系统评价的新版Cochrane手册》
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10(10):ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142.
2
Health literacy is associated with health behaviour and self-reported health: A large population-based study in individuals with cardiovascular disease.健康素养与健康行为和自我报告的健康状况有关:一项基于人群的心血管疾病患者大型研究。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Nov;24(17):1880-1888. doi: 10.1177/2047487317729538. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
3
The Relationship between Health Literacy and Health Behaviour in People with Diabetes: A Danish Population-Based Study.糖尿病患者的健康素养与健康行为之间的关系:一项基于丹麦人群的研究。
J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:7823130. doi: 10.1155/2016/7823130. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
4
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.
5
Use Your Words Carefully: What Is a Chronic Disease?谨慎用词:什么是慢性病?
Front Public Health. 2016 Aug 2;4:159. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00159. eCollection 2016.
6
Theory of planned behavior and adherence in chronic illness: a meta-analysis.慢性病中的计划行为理论与依从性:一项荟萃分析。
J Behav Med. 2015 Aug;38(4):673-88. doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9644-3. Epub 2015 May 21.
7
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
8
Applying theory of planned behavior to predict exercise maintenance in sarcopenic elderly.应用计划行为理论预测老年肌少症患者的运动维持情况。
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Sep 16;9:1551-61. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S60462. eCollection 2014.
9
A comparison of physical activity correlates across breast, prostate and colorectal cancer survivors in Nova Scotia, Canada.加拿大新斯科舍省乳腺癌、前列腺癌和结直肠癌幸存者身体活动相关因素的比较。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Apr;22(4):891-903. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-2045-7. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
10
Health literacy interventions and outcomes: an updated systematic review.健康素养干预措施与结果:一项更新的系统评价。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011 Mar(199):1-941.