• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[混交比例对[树种1]与[树种2]混交林碳储存与分配的影响] (你提供的原文中树种名称缺失,请补充完整以便准确翻译)

[Effects of mixing proportions on carbon storage and allocation in mixed plantation of and ].

作者信息

Yan Jia-Jie, Li Feng-Ri, Xie Long-Fei, Miao Zheng, Dong Li-Hu

机构信息

Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management, School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China.

出版信息

Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 May;33(5):1175-1182. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202205.002.

DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202205.002
PMID:35730074
Abstract

In this study, four types of mixed and plantations were selected according to the rows-mixing proportions (type Ⅰ: 5:3, type Ⅱ: 6:4, type Ⅲ: 5:5, type Ⅳ: 1:1). The see-mingly unrelated biomass models of and were developed for obtaining biomass values, and the difference and composition of carbon storage in each forest layer and ecosystem were analyzed. The results showed that carbon storage of arbor layer in different stand types was 39.86-50.12 t·hm, the carbon storage of arbor layer inⅠ, Ⅱ and Ⅳ was significantly higher than that in type Ⅲ. The carbon storage of understory was 0.10-0.30 t·hm, with that in type Ⅱ being significantly higher than other types. Carbon storage of litter layer was 4.43-6.96 t·hm, with type Ⅱ and Ⅲ being significantly higher than those of the other types. In the soil layer, carbon storage was 34.97-54.66 t·hm. The carbon storage of soil layer in type Ⅱ was significantly greater than those in the other types. At the whole ecosystem level, carbon storage of type Ⅰ-Ⅳ was 90.43, 108.27, 85.83 and 89.92 t·hm, respectively. Type Ⅱ had significantly greater carbon storage than the other types. The arbor layer and soil layer were the major carbon pools in the ecosystem, which accounted for 43.3%-55.7% and 38.7%-50.5% of the total, respectively. Our results suggested that mixing by six rows of and four rows of was better for future planting.

摘要

在本研究中,根据行混合比例选择了四种混交林和人工林类型(类型Ⅰ:5:3,类型Ⅱ:6:4,类型Ⅲ:5:5,类型Ⅳ:1:1)。为获取生物量值,建立了看似不相关的[具体树种1]和[具体树种2]生物量模型,并分析了各林层和生态系统中碳储量的差异与组成。结果表明,不同林分类型乔木层的碳储量为39.86 - 50.12 t·hm,类型Ⅰ、Ⅱ和Ⅳ乔木层的碳储量显著高于类型Ⅲ。林下植被层的碳储量为0.10 - 0.30 t·hm,其中类型Ⅱ显著高于其他类型。凋落物层的碳储量为4.43 - 6.96 t·hm,类型Ⅱ和Ⅲ显著高于其他类型。土壤层的碳储量为34.97 - 54.66 t·hm,类型Ⅱ土壤层的碳储量显著大于其他类型。在整个生态系统水平上,类型Ⅰ - Ⅳ的碳储量分别为90.43、108.27、85.83和89.92 t·hm,类型Ⅱ的碳储量显著大于其他类型。乔木层和土壤层是生态系统中的主要碳库,分别占总量的43.3% - 55.7%和38.7% - 50.5%。我们的结果表明,未来造林中采用六行[具体树种1]和四行[具体树种2]混交更好。

相似文献

1
[Effects of mixing proportions on carbon storage and allocation in mixed plantation of and ].[混交比例对[树种1]与[树种2]混交林碳储存与分配的影响] (你提供的原文中树种名称缺失,请补充完整以便准确翻译)
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 May;33(5):1175-1182. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202205.002.
2
[Carbon storage and its allocation in karst forest at different stand ages in Guangxi, China].[中国广西不同林龄喀斯特森林的碳储存及其分配]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2017 Mar 18;28(3):721-729. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201703.039.
3
[Simulation of carbon sequestration and timber production in plantation based on COFIX model].基于COFIX模型的人工林碳固存与木材生产模拟
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 Oct;33(10):2653-2662. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202210.009.
4
[Carbon and nitrogen storages and allocation in tree layers of Fraxinus mandshurica and Larix gmelinii plantations].[水曲柳和落叶松人工林林分碳氮储量及分配]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2009 Aug;20(8):1791-6.
5
[Effects of nitrogen fertilization on seasonal dynamics of soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in Larix gmelinii and Fraxinus mandshurica plantations].[施氮对落叶松和水曲柳人工林土壤微生物生物量碳氮季节动态的影响]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2009 Sep;20(9):2063-71.
6
[Carbon storage of forest vegetation and allocation for main forest types in the east of Da-xing'an Mountains based on additive biomass model].基于累加生物量模型的大兴安岭东部森林植被碳储量及主要森林类型分配研究
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2016 Dec;27(12):3749-3758. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201612.012.
7
[Carbon storage and allocation in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations with different stand ages.].[不同林龄杉木人工林的碳储存与分配。]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2016 Apr 22;27(4):1125-1134. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201604.020.
8
[Difference between carbon storage of burned area under different restorations in Greater Xing' an Mountains, Northeast China].[中国东北大兴安岭不同恢复措施下火烧迹地碳储量差异]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2015 Nov;26(11):3443-50.
9
[Soil organic carbon storage in different aged Larix gmelinii plantations in Great Xing' an Mountains of Northeast China].[中国东北大兴安岭不同树龄兴安落叶松人工林土壤有机碳储量]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2013 Jan;24(1):10-6.
10
[Carbon storage maturity age of Larix olgenisis and L. kaempferi].[落叶松和日本落叶松的碳储存成熟年龄]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2008 Dec;19(12):2567-71.