Suppr超能文献

性反应刺激检测中低刺激反应辨别力的三种不同解释的检验。

A Test of Three Different Explanations for Low Stimulus Response Discrimination in Phallometric Testing.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Saint Mary's University.

Forensic Research Unit, University of Ottawa's Institute of Mental Health Research at The Royal.

出版信息

J Sex Res. 2023 Feb;60(2):282-293. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2022.2086962. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

Abstract

Phallometric assessment is used to assess men's sexual interest in children and to assist in risk assessment and treatment planning. A common response pattern, especially when the assessment is conducted in a forensic context, is an indiscriminate pattern of penile responses: No sexual stimulus seems to produce a substantially higher response than another. This indiscriminate response profile could be the result of (1) (in particular, reducing the responses to child stimuli); (2) floor or ceiling effects caused by low or high , or (3) (the individual is similarly sexually interested in both children and adults). In this study of 2,858 adult male patients who underwent volumetric phallometric assessment for sexual interest in children between 1995 and 2011, we tested these three possible explanations. Results showed support for each of the explanations, but the variance accounted for in response discrimination was quite small when considering each explanation (separately or when considered together). We discuss avenues for future research to better discern the causes of indiscriminate responding in phallometric assessment.

摘要

阴茎体积描记评估用于评估男性对儿童的性兴趣,以协助风险评估和治疗计划。一种常见的反应模式,特别是在法医环境下进行评估时,是一种无差别的阴茎反应模式:似乎没有任何性刺激会比其他刺激产生更高的反应。这种无差别的反应模式可能是以下原因造成的:(1)(特别是减少对儿童刺激的反应);(2)由于低或高,出现地板或天花板效应,或(3)(个体对儿童和成人同样有性兴趣)。在这项对 1995 年至 2011 年间接受儿童性兴趣体积描记评估的 2858 名成年男性患者的研究中,我们测试了这三种可能的解释。结果支持了每一种解释,但当考虑到每种解释(单独或一起考虑)时,对反应区分的解释差异很小。我们讨论了未来研究的途径,以更好地辨别阴茎体积描记评估中无差别反应的原因。

相似文献

1
A Test of Three Different Explanations for Low Stimulus Response Discrimination in Phallometric Testing.
J Sex Res. 2023 Feb;60(2):282-293. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2022.2086962. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
3
Measurement of risk of sexual violence through phallometric testing.
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2009 Apr;11 Suppl 1:S368-9. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.02.073. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
4
Validity in Phallometric Testing for Sexual Interests in Children: A Meta-Analytic Review.
Assessment. 2019 Apr;26(3):535-551. doi: 10.1177/1073191117706139. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
5
Variability of stimulus effect in the course of phallometric testing.
Arch Sex Behav. 1977 Mar;6(2):135-41. doi: 10.1007/BF01541705.
6
Sensitivity and Specificity of the Phallometric Test for Hebephilia.
J Sex Med. 2015 Sep;12(9):1940-50. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12970. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
7
Preventing faking in phallometric assessments of sexual preference.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;528:49-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb50849.x.
8
Penile-response profiles of sexual aggressors during phallometric testing.
Sex Abuse. 2009 Sep;21(3):308-34. doi: 10.1177/1079063209342073.
9
Sexual attraction to others: a comparison of two models of alloerotic responding in men.
Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Feb;41(1):13-29. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9675-3. Epub 2010 Sep 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验