Department of Design, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 22;17(6):e0269504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269504. eCollection 2022.
A wealth of research indicates that emotions play an instrumental role in creative problem-solving. However, most of these studies have relied primarily on diary studies and self-report scales when measuring emotions during the creative processes. There has been a need to capture in-the-moment emotional experiences of individuals during the creative process using an automated emotion recognition tool. The experiment in this study examined the process-related difference between the creative problem solving (CPS) and simple problem solving (SPS) processes using protocol analysis and Markov's chains. Further, this experiment introduced a novel method for measuring in-the-moment emotional experiences of individuals during the CPS and SPS processes using facial expressions and machine learning algorithms. The experiment described in this study employed 64 participants to solve different tasks while wearing camera-mounted headgear. Using retrospective analysis, the participants verbally reported their thoughts using video-stimulated recall. Our results indicate differences in the cognitive efforts spent at different stages during the CPS and SPS processes. We also found that most of the creative stages were associated with ambivalent emotions whereas the stage of block was associated with negative emotions.
大量研究表明,情绪在创造性问题解决中起着重要作用。然而,这些研究大多主要依赖日记研究和自我报告量表来测量创造性过程中的情绪。需要使用自动化情绪识别工具来捕捉个体在创造性过程中的即时情绪体验。本研究中的实验使用协议分析和马尔可夫链来检查创造性问题解决 (CPS) 和简单问题解决 (SPS) 过程之间的过程相关差异。此外,该实验引入了一种使用面部表情和机器学习算法测量个体在 CPS 和 SPS 过程中即时情绪体验的新方法。本研究中的实验使用 64 名参与者在佩戴摄像头安装的头饰的情况下解决不同的任务。通过回顾性分析,参与者使用视频刺激回忆口头报告他们的想法。我们的结果表明,在 CPS 和 SPS 过程的不同阶段,认知努力存在差异。我们还发现,大多数创造性阶段与矛盾情绪有关,而阻塞阶段与消极情绪有关。