• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发散性思维:生成常见物体新用途的策略与执行参与

Divergent thinking: strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects.

作者信息

Gilhooly K J, Fioratou E, Anthony S H, Wynn V

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Herts, UK.

出版信息

Br J Psychol. 2007 Nov;98(Pt 4):611-25. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2007.tb00467.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2007.tb00467.x
PMID:17535464
Abstract

Although the Alternative Uses divergent thinking task has been widely used in psychometric and experimental studies of creativity, the cognitive processes underlying this task have not been examined in detail before the two studies are reported here. In Experiment 1, a verbal protocol analysis study of the Alternative Uses task was carried out with a Think aloud group (N=40) and a Silent control group (N=64). The groups did not differ in fluency or novelty of idea production indicating no verbal overshadowing. Analysis of protocols from the Think aloud group suggested that initial responses were based on a strategy of Retrieval from long-term memory of pre-known uses. Later responses tended to be based on a small number of other strategies: property-use generation, imagined Disassembly of the target object into components and scanning of Broad Use categories for possible uses of the target item. Novelty of uses was particularly associated with the Disassembly strategy. Experiment 2 (N=103) addressed the role of executive processes in generating new and previously known uses by examining individual differences in category fluency, letter fluency and divergent task performance. After completing the task, participants were asked to indicate which of their responses were new for them. It was predicted and found in regression analyses that letter fluency (an executively loading task) was related to production of 'new' uses and category fluency was related to production of 'old' uses but not vice versa.

摘要

尽管“替代用途”发散性思维任务已广泛应用于创造力的心理测量和实验研究中,但在本文所报道的两项研究之前,尚未对该任务背后的认知过程进行详细考察。在实验1中,对“替代用途”任务进行了言语报告分析研究,分为出声思考组(N = 40)和安静对照组(N = 64)。两组在想法产生的流畅性或新颖性方面没有差异,这表明不存在言语遮蔽效应。对出声思考组的报告分析表明,最初的反应基于从长期记忆中检索已知用途的策略。后来的反应往往基于少数其他策略:属性-用途生成、将目标物体想象拆解成组件以及扫描广泛用途类别以寻找目标物品的可能用途。用途的新颖性尤其与拆解策略相关。实验2(N = 103)通过考察类别流畅性、字母流畅性和发散任务表现方面的个体差异,探讨了执行过程在生成新用途和已知用途中的作用。完成任务后,要求参与者指出哪些反应对他们来说是新的。在回归分析中预测并发现,字母流畅性(一项执行负荷任务)与“新”用途的产生相关,类别流畅性与“旧”用途的产生相关,反之则不然。

相似文献

1
Divergent thinking: strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects.发散性思维:生成常见物体新用途的策略与执行参与
Br J Psychol. 2007 Nov;98(Pt 4):611-25. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2007.tb00467.x.
2
Semantic search during divergent thinking.发散性思维过程中的语义搜索。
Cognition. 2017 Sep;166:344-357. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.039. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
3
The relationship between methods of scoring the alternate uses task and the neural correlates of divergent thinking: Evidence from voxel-based morphometry.交替用途任务评分方法与发散思维的神经相关性之间的关系:基于体素的形态计量学证据。
Neuroimage. 2020 Dec;223:117325. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117325. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
4
Creativity and Memory: Effects of an Episodic-Specificity Induction on Divergent Thinking.创造力与记忆:情景特异性诱导对发散性思维的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Sep;26(9):1461-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797615591863. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
5
Forgetting as a consequence and enabler of creative thinking.遗忘作为创造性思维的结果和促成因素。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Nov;40(6):1594-609. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000006. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
6
Functional magnetic resonance imaging of divergent and convergent thinking in Big-C creativity.大 C 创造力中发散思维和聚合思维的功能磁共振成像。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Sep;118(Pt A):59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.02.017. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
7
Divergent creative thinking in young and older adults: Extending the effects of an episodic specificity induction.年轻人和老年人的发散性创造性思维:扩展情景特异性诱导的效果
Mem Cognit. 2016 Aug;44(6):974-88. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0605-z.
8
Experimental effects of acute exercise and music listening on cognitive creativity.急性运动和听音乐对认知创造力的实验效果
Physiol Behav. 2018 Jul 1;191:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.03.034. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
9
Chain free association, creativity, and the default mode network.无链自由联想、创造力与默认模式网络。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Sep;118(Pt A):40-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.018. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
10
The relationships between musical expertise and divergent thinking.音乐专长与发散性思维之间的关系。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Feb;203:102990. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102990. Epub 2020 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Creative Evaluation: The Role of Memory in Novelty & Effectiveness Judgements.创造性评估:记忆在新颖性和有效性判断中的作用。
Creat Res J. 2024 Mar 5. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2024.2322856.
2
Subjective valuation as a domain-general process in creative thinking.主观评价作为创造性思维中的一种通用领域过程。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jul 17;3(1):108. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00285-8.
3
Does feeling collective responsibility for intergroup harm lead to infrahumanization?对群体间伤害感到集体责任会导致人性贬低吗?
PLoS One. 2025 May 29;20(5):e0323292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323292. eCollection 2025.
4
Puffed Up Creativity? The Relationship Between Grandiose Narcissism and Creativity: A Study of Chinese High-Tech Companies.膨胀的创造力?浮夸型自恋与创造力之间的关系:对中国高科技公司的一项研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;15(3):273. doi: 10.3390/bs15030273.
5
The Role of Creative Mindsets in the Relationship Between Metacognitive Experience and Divergent Thinking: A Metacognitive Perspective.创造性思维模式在元认知体验与发散性思维关系中的作用:一种元认知视角
J Intell. 2025 Feb 24;13(3):27. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13030027.
6
Self-guided transitions and creative idea search: adaptively choosing flexibility versus persistence in divergent and convergent thinking tasks.自我引导的转变与创意搜索:在发散性和聚合性思维任务中适应性地选择灵活性与坚持性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Mar 19;12(3):241394. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241394. eCollection 2025 Mar.
7
The effect of nature on creativity through mental imagery.自然通过心理意象对创造力产生的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 9;20(1):e0315141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315141. eCollection 2025.
8
Neural, genetic, and cognitive signatures of creativity.创造力的神经、遗传和认知特征。
Commun Biol. 2024 Oct 15;7(1):1324. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-07007-6.
9
Sparking creativity: Encouraging creative idea generation through automatically generated word recommendations.激发创造力:通过自动生成的单词推荐来鼓励创意的产生。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7939-7962. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02463-8. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
10
Scaling a common assessment of associative ability: Development and validation of a multiple-choice compound remote associates task.对联想能力进行普遍评估的扩展:多项选择复合远程联想任务的开发与验证。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):1-29. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02422-3. Epub 2024 Jun 5.