Gilhooly K J, Fioratou E, Anthony S H, Wynn V
School of Psychology, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Herts, UK.
Br J Psychol. 2007 Nov;98(Pt 4):611-25. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2007.tb00467.x.
Although the Alternative Uses divergent thinking task has been widely used in psychometric and experimental studies of creativity, the cognitive processes underlying this task have not been examined in detail before the two studies are reported here. In Experiment 1, a verbal protocol analysis study of the Alternative Uses task was carried out with a Think aloud group (N=40) and a Silent control group (N=64). The groups did not differ in fluency or novelty of idea production indicating no verbal overshadowing. Analysis of protocols from the Think aloud group suggested that initial responses were based on a strategy of Retrieval from long-term memory of pre-known uses. Later responses tended to be based on a small number of other strategies: property-use generation, imagined Disassembly of the target object into components and scanning of Broad Use categories for possible uses of the target item. Novelty of uses was particularly associated with the Disassembly strategy. Experiment 2 (N=103) addressed the role of executive processes in generating new and previously known uses by examining individual differences in category fluency, letter fluency and divergent task performance. After completing the task, participants were asked to indicate which of their responses were new for them. It was predicted and found in regression analyses that letter fluency (an executively loading task) was related to production of 'new' uses and category fluency was related to production of 'old' uses but not vice versa.
尽管“替代用途”发散性思维任务已广泛应用于创造力的心理测量和实验研究中,但在本文所报道的两项研究之前,尚未对该任务背后的认知过程进行详细考察。在实验1中,对“替代用途”任务进行了言语报告分析研究,分为出声思考组(N = 40)和安静对照组(N = 64)。两组在想法产生的流畅性或新颖性方面没有差异,这表明不存在言语遮蔽效应。对出声思考组的报告分析表明,最初的反应基于从长期记忆中检索已知用途的策略。后来的反应往往基于少数其他策略:属性-用途生成、将目标物体想象拆解成组件以及扫描广泛用途类别以寻找目标物品的可能用途。用途的新颖性尤其与拆解策略相关。实验2(N = 103)通过考察类别流畅性、字母流畅性和发散任务表现方面的个体差异,探讨了执行过程在生成新用途和已知用途中的作用。完成任务后,要求参与者指出哪些反应对他们来说是新的。在回归分析中预测并发现,字母流畅性(一项执行负荷任务)与“新”用途的产生相关,类别流畅性与“旧”用途的产生相关,反之则不然。