Suppr超能文献

多方位干预减少住院期间催眠药物的使用:一项试点研究。

Reducing the use of sleep-inducing drugs during hospitalisation by a multi-faceted intervention: a pilot study.

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2024 Feb 22;31(2):117-123. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-003097.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Many patients receive benzodiazepines or Z-drugs during hospitalisation due to sleeping problems. In a pilot study, we aimed to find out whether, and to what degree, a multi-faceted intervention can reduce the use of these drugs, especially in older patients and those without a psychiatric or neurological disorder. The results of this pilot study should inform the design of a randomised controlled trial (RCT).

METHODS

In a quasi-experimental design, we implemented the intervention in a German hospital with the support of the hospital director, medical and nursing staff and employee representatives. We compared prescription data for sleep-inducing drugs before and after the intervention by Fisher's exact test and used odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% CIs as a measure of effect size.

RESULTS

The data from 960 patients aged ≥65 years before intervention and 1049 patients after intervention were analysed. Before intervention, 483 (50.3%) of the patients received sleep-inducing drugs at some time during their hospital stay. After the intervention, 381 (36.3%) patients received a sleep-inducing drug, resulting in an OR of 0.56 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.68) (p<0.001). The reduction was particularly pronounced in patients without a psychiatric or neurological disorder (from 45.0% to 28.8%). In particular, the consumption of benzodiazepines declined from 24.3% to 8.5% (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.4) (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A multi-faceted intervention to change the practice of the use of sleep-inducing drugs in one hospital was successful in terms of drug reduction, particularly for benzodiazepines. The intervention was effective especially for target persons-that is, those without a psychiatric or neurological disease. Awareness of the magnitude of the change and the role of important stakeholders could help researchers and hospital staff to design a large RCT, including control hospitals, to evaluate the success of a multi-faceted intervention on a scientifically sound basis.

摘要

目的

许多患者在住院期间因睡眠问题而接受苯二氮䓬类或 Z 类药物治疗。在一项试点研究中,我们旨在确定多方面干预措施是否可以减少这些药物的使用,尤其是在老年患者和无精神或神经疾病的患者中,以及可以减少到何种程度。本试点研究的结果将为随机对照试验(RCT)的设计提供信息。

方法

在准实验设计中,我们在医院院长、医护人员和员工代表的支持下,在一家德国医院实施了该干预措施。我们使用 Fisher 精确检验比较了干预前后催眠药物的处方数据,并使用优势比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)作为效应量的衡量指标。

结果

分析了干预前 960 名年龄≥65 岁的患者和干预后 1049 名患者的数据。干预前,483 名(50.3%)患者在住院期间的某个时间点接受了催眠药物治疗。干预后,381 名(36.3%)患者接受了催眠药物治疗,OR 为 0.56(95%CI 0.47 至 0.68)(p<0.001)。在无精神或神经疾病的患者中,这种减少尤为明显(从 45.0%降至 28.8%)。特别是,苯二氮䓬类药物的消耗量从 24.3%降至 8.5%(OR 0.31;95%CI 0.23 至 0.4)(p<0.001)。

结论

在一家医院进行的改变使用催眠药物做法的多方面干预措施在减少药物使用方面取得了成功,特别是对于苯二氮䓬类药物。该干预措施对目标人群(即无精神或神经疾病的患者)特别有效。了解变化的幅度以及重要利益相关者的作用,可以帮助研究人员和医院工作人员设计一项大型 RCT,包括对照医院,以在科学合理的基础上评估多方面干预措施的成功。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1e7/10895184/5ba0a704818f/ejhpharm-2021-003097f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验