Suppr超能文献

少年药物法庭对药物使用、心理健康和累犯的影响:来自多地点实验评估的结果。

The Impact of Juvenile Drug Treatment Courts on Substance Use, Mental Health, and Recidivism: Results from a Multisite Experimental Evaluation.

机构信息

Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Chestnut Health Systems, Bloomington, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Behav Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct;49(4):436-455. doi: 10.1007/s11414-022-09805-4. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

Abstract

Juvenile Drug Treatment Courts (JDTC) emerged in the mid-1990s as a potential solution to concern about substance use among youth in the juvenile justice system (JJS). Despite substantial research, findings on the JDTC effectiveness for reducing recidivism and substance use remain inconsistent, hampered by methodological problems. In 2016, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention published research-based JDTC Guidelines for best practices, and funded technical assistance for implementation and a multisite national outcomes study among JDTCs implementing the Guidelines. Ten sites were originally selected for this study, with a JDTC and Traditional Juvenile Court (TJC) participating. In two sites, moderate- to high-risk youth were randomized to JDTC or TJC, and in eight sites, a regression discontinuity design assigned moderate- to high-risk youth to JDTC, and other youth to TJC. Findings from four sites with sufficient cases and follow-up rates indicated that JDTCs reduced cannabis use, increased access to mental health services, and reduced recidivism. However, the effects were small to moderate, with positive impacts mainly observed among high-risk youth. The impacts of JDTCs may have been attenuated because Guidelines implementation was inconsistent across courts, and some TJCs implemented elements of the Guidelines, blurring the distinction between JDTCs and TJCs.

摘要

少年药物法庭(JDTC)于 20 世纪 90 年代中期出现,是解决青少年司法系统(JJS)中青少年药物滥用问题的潜在方案。尽管有大量研究,但 JDTC 在减少累犯和药物使用方面的效果仍不一致,这受到方法学问题的阻碍。2016 年,青少年司法和 delinquency 预防办公室发布了基于研究的 JDTC 最佳实践指南,并为实施提供了技术援助,并对实施该指南的 JDTC 进行了多地点全国结果研究。最初选择了 10 个地点进行这项研究,每个地点都有一个 JDTC 和传统的少年法庭(TJC)参与。在两个地点,中度至高度风险的青少年被随机分配到 JDTC 或 TJC,在八个地点,回归不连续性设计将中度至高度风险的青少年分配到 JDTC,其他青少年分配到 TJC。四个有足够案例和随访率的地点的调查结果表明,JDTC 减少了大麻的使用,增加了获得心理健康服务的机会,并减少了累犯。然而,这些效果较小到中等,积极影响主要在高风险青少年中观察到。JDTC 的影响可能已经减弱,因为法院之间的指南实施不一致,一些 TJC 实施了指南的要素,模糊了 JDTC 和 TJC 之间的区别。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1281/9217114/6d8d272d7850/11414_2022_9805_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验