• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保守治疗对腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效:一项网状Meta分析

Clinical Effectiveness of Conservative Treatments on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Chen Xuanwei, Zheng Zhizhan, Lin Jianhua

机构信息

The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian, China.

Xianyou Country General Hospital, Fujian, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jun 6;13:859296. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.859296. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2022.859296
PMID:35734403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9207476/
Abstract

To systematically evaluate the clinical effectiveness of conservative treatments including pharmacological treatments and nonpharmacological treatments on patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. We searched six electronic databases systematically for randomized clinical trials published between January 2000 and July 2021, including the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library. The studies focused on the therapeutic effects of pharmacological treatments including calcitonin, antiepileptics, neurotrophic drugs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Chinese Traditional Medicine, limaprost, and nonpharmacological treatments like physiotherapy for treating lumbar spinal stenosis were included. The outcome was measured using the visual analog scale, Oswestry Dysfunction Index, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score, and EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire. The quality of eligible studies was assessed by using the Cochrane recommended bias risk assessment tool. Stata was used to conduct the network meta-analysis. A total of 12 randomized control trials with 1,194 patients were included. The network meta-analysis showed that for the visual analog scale, a better therapeutic effect was noted while using Chinese Traditional Medicine and physiotherapy, followed by analgesics drugs and limaprost. Limaprost and calcitonin were better in decreasing the Oswestry Dysfunction Index. In terms of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score, the use of traditional Chinese Medicine and limaprost were associated with a better improvement than other treatments. Meanwhile, limaprost combined with analgesics drugs was found to be effective to improve the EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire. Among the commonly used conservative treatments for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis, limaprost may have better efficacy in improving the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score and decreasing the Oswestry Dysfunction Index, with a beneficial effect on decreasing the visual analog scale and improving the EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire. website, identifier registration number.

摘要

为系统评价包括药物治疗和非药物治疗在内的保守治疗对腰椎管狭窄症患者的临床疗效。我们系统检索了6个电子数据库,以查找2000年1月至2021年7月期间发表的随机临床试验,包括中国知网、万方数据、PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆。纳入的研究聚焦于药物治疗(包括降钙素、抗癫痫药、神经营养药物、非甾体抗炎药、中药、利马前列素)和非药物治疗(如物理治疗)对腰椎管狭窄症的治疗效果。采用视觉模拟量表、Oswestry功能障碍指数、日本矫形外科学会评分和欧洲五维健康量表对结局进行测量。使用Cochrane推荐的偏倚风险评估工具对符合条件的研究质量进行评估。采用Stata进行网状Meta分析。共纳入12项随机对照试验,涉及1194例患者。网状Meta分析表明,在视觉模拟量表方面,使用中药和物理治疗时疗效较好,其次是镇痛药和利马前列素。利马前列素和降钙素在降低Oswestry功能障碍指数方面效果较好。在日本矫形外科学会评分方面,使用中药和利马前列素比其他治疗的改善情况更好。同时,发现利马前列素联合镇痛药对改善欧洲五维健康量表有效。在腰椎管狭窄症常用的保守治疗中,利马前列素在改善日本矫形外科学会评分和降低Oswestry功能障碍指数方面可能具有更好的疗效,对降低视觉模拟量表评分和改善欧洲五维健康量表也有有益作用。网站,标识符注册号。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/5c17acea5a18/fphar-13-859296-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/84db11ce106e/fphar-13-859296-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/4f9a0d9d637e/fphar-13-859296-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/6650caa5fd0a/fphar-13-859296-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/c5e1d602444c/fphar-13-859296-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/9172fd8479eb/fphar-13-859296-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/a8c9bd35698a/fphar-13-859296-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/14c0e86b353c/fphar-13-859296-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/c8d2f6066b7f/fphar-13-859296-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/7aed5aa7971d/fphar-13-859296-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/5c17acea5a18/fphar-13-859296-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/84db11ce106e/fphar-13-859296-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/4f9a0d9d637e/fphar-13-859296-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/6650caa5fd0a/fphar-13-859296-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/c5e1d602444c/fphar-13-859296-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/9172fd8479eb/fphar-13-859296-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/a8c9bd35698a/fphar-13-859296-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/14c0e86b353c/fphar-13-859296-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/c8d2f6066b7f/fphar-13-859296-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/7aed5aa7971d/fphar-13-859296-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5750/9207476/5c17acea5a18/fphar-13-859296-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical Effectiveness of Conservative Treatments on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Network Meta-Analysis.保守治疗对腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效:一项网状Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jun 6;13:859296. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.859296. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparative study of the efficacy of limaprost and pregabalin as single agents and in combination for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.利马前列素与普瑞巴林单药及联合治疗腰椎管狭窄症疗效的比较研究:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照非劣效性试验。
Spine J. 2016 Jun;16(6):756-63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.02.049. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
3
Limaprost alfadex and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for sciatica due to lumbar spinal stenosis.利马前列素 alfadex 与非甾体抗炎药治疗腰椎管狭窄症所致坐骨神经痛。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Apr;22(4):794-801. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2551-1. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
4
Evaluation of Effectiveness of Treatment Strategies for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies.评价退行性腰椎管狭窄症治疗策略的有效性:临床研究的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Aug;152:95-106. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.016. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
5
Microdiscectomy compared with transforaminal epidural steroid injection for persistent radicular pain caused by prolapsed intervertebral disc: the NERVES RCT.微创手术与经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射治疗椎间盘突出症所致持续性神经根痛的比较:NERVES RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Apr;25(24):1-86. doi: 10.3310/hta25240.
6
Effectiveness of Percutaneous Adhesiolysis in Managing Chronic Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮粘连松解术治疗慢性中央型腰椎管狭窄症的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2019 Nov;22(6):E523-E550.
7
Comparison Between Oblique Pulling Spinal Manipulation and Other Treatments for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.斜扳法脊柱推拿与腰椎间盘突出症其他治疗方法的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018 Nov-Dec;41(9):771-779. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.04.005.
8
Rehabilitation following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症手术后的康复
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 9;2013(12):CD009644. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009644.pub2.
9
Intra-articular viscosupplementation with hylan g-f 20 to treat osteoarthritis of the knee: an evidence-based analysis.使用透明质酸钠凝胶20进行膝关节腔内粘弹性补充治疗骨关节炎:一项循证分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(10):1-66. Epub 2005 Jun 1.
10
Comparison of the efficacy and safety between interspinous process distraction device and open decompression surgery in treating lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta analysis.棘突间撑开装置与开放减压手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效及安全性比较:一项Meta分析
J Invest Surg. 2015 Feb;28(1):40-9. doi: 10.3109/08941939.2014.932474. Epub 2014 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Lumbar MRI and Back Pain After Failed Conservative Treatment: The RuDDS Study.腰椎磁共振成像与保守治疗失败后的背痛:RuDDS研究
Global Spine J. 2025 Sep 3:21925682251373046. doi: 10.1177/21925682251373046.
2
Clinical efficacy and quality of life in elderly patients with lumbar degenerative disease treated with TLIF combined with unilateral pedicle screw fixation: a randomized controlled study.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)联合单侧椎弓根螺钉固定治疗老年腰椎退变性疾病的临床疗效及生活质量:一项随机对照研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 26;20(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05821-0.
3
Novel approach of ultrasound-guided lateral recess block for a patient with lateral recess stenosis: A case report.

本文引用的文献

1
Sagittal spinal alignment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis by rasterstereographic back shape analysis: an observational retrospective study.基于光栅立体背形分析法的强直性脊柱炎患者矢状位脊柱排列:一项观察性回顾性研究。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Apr;56(2):191-196. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.05993-6. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
2
Effects of Nasal Calcitonin vs. Oral Gabapentin on Pain and Symptoms of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Clinical Trial Study.鼻用降钙素与口服加巴喷丁对腰椎管狭窄症疼痛及症状的影响:一项临床试验研究。
Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 5;9:133-8. doi: 10.4137/CMAMD.S39938. eCollection 2016.
3
超声引导下侧隐窝阻滞治疗侧隐窝狭窄患者的新方法:病例报告
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Feb 16;12(5):1010-1017. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i5.1010.
4
Development of CORE-CM core outcome domain sets for trials of Chinese medicine for lumbar spinal stenosis.制定针对中国医学治疗腰椎椎管狭窄症试验的 CORE-CM 核心结局域集。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 16;13(10):e075856. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075856.
5
A Protocol for a Single-Centered, Pragmatic, Randomized, Controlled, Parallel Trial Comparing Comprehensive Nonsurgical Therapy Options for Individuals with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.一项单中心、实用、随机、对照、平行试验的方案,该试验比较腰椎管狭窄症患者的综合非手术治疗方案。
J Pain Res. 2023 Mar 9;16:773-784. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S398897. eCollection 2023.
6
Comparison of the short-term effects of lumbar endoscopic and microscopic tubular unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression in the treatment of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎内镜与显微镜下管状单侧椎板切开双侧减压治疗老年腰椎管狭窄症的短期疗效比较
Eur J Med Res. 2022 Oct 29;27(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00847-0.
Comparative study of the efficacy of limaprost and pregabalin as single agents and in combination for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
利马前列素与普瑞巴林单药及联合治疗腰椎管狭窄症疗效的比较研究:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照非劣效性试验。
Spine J. 2016 Jun;16(6):756-63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.02.049. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
4
Acupuncture for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.针刺治疗腰椎管狭窄症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Complement Ther Med. 2013 Oct;21(5):535-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
5
The effect of a prostaglandin E1 derivative on the symptoms and quality of life of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.前列腺素E1衍生物对腰椎管狭窄症患者症状及生活质量的影响
J Orthop Sci. 2013 Mar;18(2):208-15. doi: 10.1007/s00776-012-0342-5. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
6
Prevalence of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and its association with physical performance in a population-based cohort in Japan: the Wakayama Spine Study.日本基于人群队列的症状性腰椎椎管狭窄症的患病率及其与身体机能表现的相关性:和歌山脊柱研究。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012 Oct;20(10):1103-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.06.018. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
7
Limaprost alfadex, a prostaglandin E1 derivative, prevents deterioration of forced exercise capability in rats with chronic compression of the spinal cord.前列地尔 alfadex,一种前列腺素 E1 衍生物,可预防脊髓慢性压迫大鼠的强制运动能力恶化。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 May 15;36(11):865-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e878a1.
8
Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study.脊柱狭窄的患病率及其与症状的关联:弗雷明汉研究
Spine J. 2009 Jul;9(7):545-50. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.005. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
9
The efficacy of prostaglandin E1 derivative in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.前列腺素E1衍生物在腰椎管狭窄症患者中的疗效。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jan 15;34(2):115-20. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818f924d.
10
The PICO strategy for the research question construction and evidence search.用于构建研究问题和检索证据的PICO策略。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2007 May-Jun;15(3):508-11. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692007000300023.