Pedrini Elena, Negro Antonella, Di Brino Eugenio, Pecoraro Valentina, Sculco Camilla, Abelli Elisabetta, Gnoli Maria, Magrelli Armando, Sangiorgi Luca, Cicchetti Americo
Department of Rare Skeletal Disorders, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Regional Agency for Health and Social Care of Emilia-Romagna, Bologna, Italy.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jun 6;13:785705. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.785705. eCollection 2022.
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, changing the diagnostic approach, has become essential in clinical settings, and its adoption by public health laboratories is now the practice. Despite this, as technological innovations, its intake requires an evaluation of both the clinical utility and the economic investment, especially considering the rare disease scenario. This study evaluated the analytical validity and the budget impact of an NGS-Ion Torrent™ approach for the molecular germline diagnosis of two musculoskeletal rare diseases. Two cohorts of 200 and 199 patients with suspect or clinical diagnosis of multiple osteochondromas (MO) and osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) previously evaluated with a single-gene diagnostic protocol were re-analyzed using a targeted NGS assay. Analytical validity was assessed by comparing NGS and single-gene protocol. A budget impact analysis using real-world cost data-considering the healthcare perspective- was performed by applying activity-based costing (ABC). The cost considered consumables, personnel, and equipment. Additional costs not related to NGS activities were not considered. Sensitivity analysis was performed. The NGS method showed a higher (for MO) and comparable (for OI) diagnostic sensitivity than the traditional techniques, apart from always reducing the time and costs of diagnosis. Overall, the cost saving per patient is € 765 for OI and € 74 for MO. Materials represented the highest cost driver of the NGS process. A time saving-proportional to the panel size-has been assessed in both cases. Our targeted NGS diagnostic approach decreases time to diagnosis and costs, appearing to be beneficial and recommended both for patients and from a healthcare perspective in routine diagnosis also considering very small gene panels and a low patient flow. The adequate analytical sensitivity always required the additional Sanger sequencing step of the low- and non-covered regions. A more accurate strategy evaluation is suggested in the case of ultra-rare/complex diseases, large gene-panel, or non-reference diagnostic centers.
新一代测序(NGS)技术改变了诊断方法,已成为临床环境中的重要技术,公共卫生实验室采用该技术现已成为惯例。尽管如此,作为技术创新,采用它需要评估临床效用和经济投资,尤其是考虑到罕见病的情况。本研究评估了一种用于两种肌肉骨骼罕见病分子种系诊断的NGS-Ion Torrent™方法的分析有效性和预算影响。对两组分别有200例和199例疑似或临床诊断为多发性骨软骨瘤(MO)和成骨不全症(OI)的患者进行了重新分析,这些患者之前已通过单基因诊断方案进行过评估,此次使用靶向NGS检测进行分析。通过比较NGS和单基因方案来评估分析有效性。采用基于活动的成本核算(ABC),从医疗保健角度出发,利用实际成本数据进行预算影响分析。所考虑的成本包括耗材、人员和设备。未考虑与NGS活动无关的额外成本。进行了敏感性分析。NGS方法显示出比传统技术更高的(对于MO)和相当的(对于OI)诊断敏感性,同时始终能减少诊断时间和成本。总体而言,OI患者每位节省成本765欧元,MO患者每位节省成本74欧元。材料是NGS过程中成本最高的驱动因素。在两种情况下都评估了与检测板大小成比例的时间节省。我们的靶向NGS诊断方法减少了诊断时间和成本,似乎对患者以及从医疗保健角度来看在常规诊断中都是有益的且值得推荐,同时也考虑到了非常小的基因检测板和低患者流量。足够的分析敏感性总是需要对低覆盖和未覆盖区域进行额外的桑格测序步骤。对于超罕见/复杂疾病、大基因检测板或非参考诊断中心的情况,建议进行更准确的策略评估。