Institut Paoli Calmettes, SESSTIM, Marseille, France.
INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Mar;26(3):314-323. doi: 10.1038/s41431-017-0081-3. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
It is currently unclear if next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies can be implemented in the diagnosis setting at an affordable cost. The aim of this study was to measure the total cost of performing NGS in clinical practice in France, in both germline and somatic cancer genetics.The study was performed on 15 French representative cancer molecular genetics laboratories performing NGS panels' tests. The production cost was estimated using a micro-costing method with resources consumed collected in situ in each laboratory from a healthcare provider perspective. In addition, we used a top-down methodology for specific post-sequencing steps including bioinformatics, technical validation, and biological validation. Additional non-specific costs were also included. Costs were detailed per step of the process (from the pre-analytical phase to delivery of results), and per cost driver (consumables, staff, equipment, maintenance, overheads). Sensitivity analyses were performed.The mean total cost of NGS for targeted gene panels was estimated to 607€ (±207) in somatic genetics and 550€ (±140) in germline oncogenetic analysis. Consumables were the highest cost driver of the sequencing process. The sensitivity analysis showed that a 25% reduction of consumables resulted in a 15% decrease in total NGS cost in somatic genetics, and 13% in germline analysis. Additional costs accounted for 30-32% of the total NGS costs.Beyond cost assessment considerations, the diffusion of NGS technologies will raise questions about their efficiency when compared to more targeted approaches, and their added value in a context of routine diagnosis.
目前尚不清楚下一代测序 (NGS) 技术是否可以以可承受的成本在诊断环境中实施。本研究的目的是衡量法国在临床实践中进行 NGS 的总成本,包括种系和体细胞癌症遗传学。该研究在 15 家法国代表性癌症分子遗传学实验室中进行,这些实验室进行了 NGS 面板测试。生产成本是使用微观成本法估算的,从医疗保健提供者的角度在每个实验室现场收集消耗的资源。此外,我们还使用自上而下的方法对特定的测序后步骤进行了评估,包括生物信息学、技术验证和生物学验证。还包括了其他非特定成本。成本按过程的每个步骤(从分析前阶段到结果交付)和每个成本驱动因素(消耗品、人员、设备、维护、间接费用)进行详细说明。进行了敏感性分析。靶向基因panel 的 NGS 总费用估计为体细胞遗传学中的 607 欧元(±207),种系肿瘤遗传学中的 550 欧元(±140)。消耗品是测序过程中最高的成本驱动因素。敏感性分析表明,消耗品减少 25%会使体细胞遗传学中的 NGS 总成本降低 15%,种系分析中降低 13%。其他成本占 NGS 总成本的 30-32%。除了成本评估考虑因素之外,NGS 技术的普及将引发关于其与更靶向方法相比的效率以及在常规诊断背景下的附加值的问题。