• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国分娩和新生儿护理中的强制和非自愿行为。

Coercion and non-consent during birth and newborn care in the United States.

机构信息

The Equity Experience, LLC, Tampa, FL, USA.

Department of Family Health Care Nursing, Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, CA, USA.

出版信息

Birth. 2022 Dec;49(4):749-762. doi: 10.1111/birt.12641. Epub 2022 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1111/birt.12641
PMID:35737547
Abstract

UNLABELLED

In the United States, Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) experience more adverse health outcomes and report mistreatment during pregnancy and birth care. The rights to bodily autonomy and consent are core components of high-quality health care. To assess experiences of coercion and nonconsent for procedures during perinatal care among racialized service users in the United States, we analyzed data from the Giving Voice to Mothers (GVtM-US) study.

METHODS

In a subset analysis of the full sample of 2700, we examined survey responses for participants who described the experience of pressure or nonconsented procedures or intervention during perinatal care. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses by racial and ethnic identity for the outcomes: pressure to have perinatal procedures (eg, induction, epidurals, episiotomy, fetal monitoring), nonconsented procedures performed during perinatal care, pressure to have a cesarean birth, and nonconsented procedures during vaginal births.

RESULTS

Among participants (n = 2490), 34% self-identified as BIPOC, and 37% had a planned hospital birth. Overall, we found significant differences in pressure and nonconsented perinatal procedures by racial and ethnic identity. These inequities persisted even after controlling for contextual factors, such as birthplace, practitioner type, and prenatal care context. For example, more participants with Black racial identity experienced nonconsented procedures during perinatal care (AOR 1.89, 95% CI 1.35-2.64) and vaginal births (AOR 1.87, 95% CI 1.23-2.83) than those identifying as white. In addition, people who identified as other minoritized racial and ethnic identities reported experiencing more pressure to accept perinatal procedures (AOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.08-2.20) than those who were white.

DISCUSSION

There is a need to address human rights violations in perinatal care for all birthing people with particular attention to the needs of those identifying as BIPOC. By eliminating mistreatment in perinatal care, such as pressure to accept services and nonconsented procedures, we can help mitigate long-standing inequities.

摘要

未加标签

在美国,黑人和原住民以及有色人种(BIPOC)在妊娠和分娩护理期间经历更多不良健康结果和遭受虐待。身体自主和同意的权利是高质量医疗保健的核心组成部分。为了评估美国种族化服务使用者在围产期护理期间程序的强制和不同意的经历,我们分析了来自“赋予母亲声音(GVtM-US)”研究的数据。

方法

在对 2700 名参与者的全样本的子样本分析中,我们检查了描述围产期护理期间经历压力或未经同意的程序或干预的参与者的调查答复。我们按种族和族裔身份进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,结果为:围产期程序的压力(例如,引产、硬膜外麻醉、会阴切开术、胎儿监测)、围产期护理期间未经同意的程序、剖宫产的压力和阴道分娩期间未经同意的程序。

结果

在参与者中(n=2490),34%自我认同为 BIPOC,37%计划在医院分娩。总体而言,我们发现种族和族裔身份在压力和未经同意的围产期程序方面存在显著差异。即使在控制了出生地点、从业者类型和产前保健背景等背景因素后,这些不平等仍然存在。例如,具有黑人种族认同的参与者经历了更多的未经同意的围产期护理期间的程序(OR 1.89,95%CI 1.35-2.64)和阴道分娩(OR 1.87,95%CI 1.23-2.83)比那些自我认同为白人的参与者。此外,与白人相比,其他少数族裔身份认同的人报告说,他们更有可能接受围产期程序(OR 1.55,95%CI 1.08-2.20)的压力。

讨论

需要解决所有分娩者围产期护理中的侵犯人权问题,特别关注自我认同为 BIPOC 的人的需求。通过消除围产期护理中的虐待行为,例如接受服务和未经同意的程序的压力,我们可以帮助减轻长期存在的不平等。

相似文献

1
Coercion and non-consent during birth and newborn care in the United States.美国分娩和新生儿护理中的强制和非自愿行为。
Birth. 2022 Dec;49(4):749-762. doi: 10.1111/birt.12641. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
2
Inequities in quality perinatal care in the United States during pregnancy and birth after cesarean.美国剖宫产术后妊娠和分娩期间围产期护理质量的不平等现象。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 22;17(9):e0274790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274790. eCollection 2022.
3
The Giving Voice to Mothers study: inequity and mistreatment during pregnancy and childbirth in the United States.《母亲发声研究》:美国妊娠和分娩期间的不平等与虐待现象。
Reprod Health. 2019 Jun 11;16(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0729-2.
4
The Impact of Culturally-Centered Care on Peripartum Experiences of Autonomy and Respect in Community Birth Centers: A Comparative Study.以文化为中心的护理对社区分娩中心围产期自主性和尊重体验的影响:一项比较研究。
Matern Child Health J. 2022 Apr;26(4):895-904. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03245-w. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
5
Experiences of Quality Perinatal Care During the US COVID-19 Pandemic.美国 COVID-19 大流行期间的优质围产期护理体验。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2021 Sep;66(5):579-588. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13269. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
6
Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey of women in Switzerland.分娩时的非强制性做法:来自瑞士全国范围的妇女调查中的风险因素和流行率估计。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 May 10;21(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03826-1.
7
Planned mode of delivery after previous cesarean section and short-term maternal and perinatal outcomes: A population-based record linkage cohort study in Scotland.既往剖宫产术后计划性分娩方式与近期母婴围生结局的关系:苏格兰基于人群的病历关联队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Sep 24;16(9):e1002913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002913. eCollection 2019 Sep.
8
Relationship Between Hospital-Level Percentage of Midwife-Attended Births and Obstetric Procedure Utilization.医院层面助产士接生比例与产科手术利用情况之间的关系。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Jan;63(1):14-22. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12702. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
9
Examining respect, autonomy, and mistreatment in childbirth in the US: do provider type and place of birth matter?审视美国分娩中的尊重、自主权和虐待问题:提供者类型和分娩地点是否重要?
Reprod Health. 2023 May 1;20(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01584-1.
10
Experiences of racial Trauma among perinatal women of color in seeking healthcare services.有色人种围产期女性在寻求医疗服务过程中的种族创伤经历。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2023 Sep-Oct;84:60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2023.06.015. Epub 2023 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Frequency and determinants of words, gestures, and attitudes experienced as disrespectful during childbirth and postpartum: A national population-based study.分娩及产后期间被视为不尊重的言语、手势和态度的频率及决定因素:一项基于全国人口的研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jun;104(6):1056-1069. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15119. Epub 2025 May 7.
2
Who is captain of the ship? Navigating the birth voyage together.谁是这艘船的船长?一起驾驭出生之旅。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jun;104(6):1006-1008. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15138. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
3
Experiences of Canadian perinatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analysis of open-ended survey responses.
COVID-19大流行期间加拿大围产期护理经验:开放式调查回复分析
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251331696. doi: 10.1177/17455057251331696. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
4
Prevalence of obstetric violence in high-income countries: A systematic review of mixed studies and meta-analysis of quantitative studies.高收入国家产科暴力的患病率:混合研究的系统评价和定量研究的荟萃分析
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jan;104(1):13-28. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14962. Epub 2024 Sep 15.
5
Consent for interventions during childbirth: A national population-based study.分娩期间干预措施的同意书:一项基于全国人口的研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jan;168(1):333-342. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15830. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
6
A Scoping Review of Patient-Centered Perinatal Contraceptive Counseling.以患者为中心的围产期避孕咨询的范围综述。
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Sep;28(9):1454-1484. doi: 10.1007/s10995-024-03946-y. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
7
Prevalence of different variations of non-consented care during the childbirth process in Mexico by geographical regions: comparing ENDIREH survey data from 2016 to 2021.墨西哥不同地理区域分娩过程中非同意护理的不同变化发生率:比较 2016 年至 2021 年的 ENDIREH 调查数据。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 May 13;24(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06549-1.
8
The Social Context of Pregnancy, Respectful Maternity Care, Biomarkers of Weathering, and Postpartum Mental Health Inequities: A Scoping Review.怀孕的社会背景、尊重孕产妇护理、健康状况的生物标志物以及产后心理健康不平等:一项范围综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 15;21(4):480. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21040480.
9
Postpartum Hospital Discharge: Birthing Parent Perspectives on Supportive Practices and Areas for Improvement.产后出院:生育父母对支持性做法及改进领域的看法
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2025;39(1):31-44. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000762. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
10
Disparities by Race in Pregnancy Care and Clinical Outcomes in Women With Multiple Sclerosis: A Diverse Multicenter Cohort.种族差异与多发性硬化症女性妊娠护理和临床结局:一个多样化的多中心队列。
Neurology. 2024 Feb 27;102(4):e208100. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000208100. Epub 2024 Jan 23.