Am Nat. 2022 Jul;200(1):140-155. doi: 10.1086/720154. Epub 2022 May 31.
AbstractScientists recognize the Caribbean archipelago as a biodiversity hotspot and employ it for their research as a natural laboratory. Yet they do not always appreciate that these ecosystems are in fact palimpsests shaped by multiple human cultures over millennia. Although post-European anthropogenic impacts are well documented, human influx into the region began about 5,000 years prior. Thus, inferences of ecological and evolutionary processes within the Caribbean may in fact represent artifacts of an unrecognized human legacy linked to issues influenced by centuries of colonial rule. The threats posed by stochastic natural and anthropogenically influenced disasters demand that we have an understanding of the natural history of endemic species if we are to halt extinctions and maintain access to traditional livelihoods. However, systematic issues have significantly biased our biological knowledge of the Caribbean. We discuss two case studies of the Caribbean's fragmented natural history collections and the effects of differing governance by the region's multiple nation states. We identify knowledge gaps and highlight a dire need for integrated and accessible inventorying of the Caribbean's collections. Research emphasizing local and international collaboration can lead to positive steps forward and will ultimately help us more accurately study Caribbean biodiversity and the ecological and evolutionary processes that generated it.
摘要 科学家们将加勒比群岛视为生物多样性热点地区,并将其作为天然实验室用于研究。然而,他们并不总是意识到,这些生态系统实际上是由数千年来多种人类文化塑造的。尽管后欧洲人类活动的影响已有充分记录,但人类涌入该地区的时间大约是在 5000 年前。因此,对加勒比地区生态和进化过程的推断实际上可能代表了与几个世纪的殖民统治有关的未被认识到的人类遗产的影响。随机的自然和人为影响灾害所构成的威胁要求我们了解地方特有物种的自然历史,如果我们要阻止灭绝并维持对传统生计的获取。然而,系统问题严重影响了我们对加勒比地区生物多样性的了解。我们讨论了加勒比地区分散的自然历史收藏的两个案例研究以及该地区多个国家不同治理的影响。我们确定了知识差距,并强调了对加勒比地区收藏进行综合和可访问编目的迫切需要。强调地方和国际合作的研究可以带来积极的进展,并最终帮助我们更准确地研究加勒比地区的生物多样性以及产生它的生态和进化过程。