Suppr超能文献

手法治疗对身体姿势的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effects of manual therapy on body posture: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Federal University of Espírito Santo, Brazil.

Federal University of Espírito Santo, Brazil.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2022 Jul;96:280-294. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.06.010. Epub 2022 Jun 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several clinical trials investigated the effectiveness of MT on body posture, but a systematic review grouping the results of these studies was not found in the literature.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does manual therapy (MT) cause postural changes?

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were: randomized controlled trials in any population; studies in which the primary intervention was the use of any MT technique; studies that evaluated the immediate, short, medium, or long-term effects of interventions on body posture; and studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals in any year and language. In March 2022, we conducted a search in the PUBMED, Cinahl, Embase, PEDro, and Cochrane Central databases that yielded 6627 articles, of which 38 including 1597 participants were eligible; of these, 35 could be grouped into 12 meta-analyses. The risk of bias was assessed using the PEDro scale and the certainty in the scientific evidence rated through the GRADE system.

RESULTS

The results allowed us to conclude with moderate certainty in the evidence that, when compared to no intervention or sham, in the short and medium term, MT reduced the forward head posture (14 studies, 584 individuals, 95%CI 0.38, 1.06), reduced thoracic kyphosis (5 studies, 217 individuals, 95%CI 0.37, 0.94), improved lateral pelvic tilt (5 studies, 211 individuals, 95%CI 0.11, 0.67) and pelvic torsion (2 studies, 120 individuals, 95%CI 0.44, 1.19) and increased plantar area (3 studies, 134 individuals, 95%CI 0.04, 0.74). With moderate certainty, there was no significant effect on shoulder protrusion (5 studies, 176 individuals, 95%CI -0.11, 0.61), shoulder alignment in the frontal plane (3 studies, 160 individuals, 95%CI -0.15, 0.52), scoliosis (2 studies, 26 individuals, 95%CI -1.57, 2.19), and pelvic anteversion (5 studies, 233 individuals, 95%CI -0.02, 0.51). With low certainty, MT had no effect on scapular upward rotation (2 studies, 74 individuals, 95%CI -0.76, 2.17). With low to very low certainty, it is possible to conclude that MT was not superior to other interventions in the short or medium term regarding the improvement of forward head posture (5 studies, 170 individuals, 95%CI -1.39, 0.67) and shoulder protrusion (3 studies, 94 individuals, 95%CI -4.04, 0.97).

SIGNIFICANCE

MT can be recommended to improve forward head posture, thoracic kyphosis and pelvic alignment in the short and medium term, but not shoulder posture and scoliosis. MT reduces the height of the plantar arch and this must be taken into account in physical therapy planning. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021244423.

摘要

背景

多项临床试验研究了手法治疗(MT)对身体姿势的有效性,但文献中未发现将这些研究结果进行系统综述的内容。

研究问题

手法治疗是否会引起姿势变化?

方法

纳入标准为:任何人群的随机对照试验;主要干预措施为使用任何手法治疗技术的研究;评估干预措施对身体姿势的即时、短期、中期和长期影响的研究;以及发表在同行评议的科学期刊上的任何年份和语言的研究。2022 年 3 月,我们在 PUBMED、Cinahl、Embase、PEDro 和 Cochrane 中央数据库中进行了检索,共检索到 6627 篇文章,其中 38 篇文章包括 1597 名参与者符合纳入标准;其中 35 篇可归入 12 项荟萃分析。使用 PEDro 量表评估偏倚风险,并使用 GRADE 系统评估科学证据的确定性。

结果

研究结果表明,从中等确定性证据来看,与无干预或假干预相比,MT 可在短期和中期内降低前伸头姿势(14 项研究,584 名参与者,95%CI 0.38,1.06)、降低胸曲(5 项研究,217 名参与者,95%CI 0.37,0.94)、改善侧骨盆倾斜(5 项研究,211 名参与者,95%CI 0.11,0.67)和骨盆扭转(2 项研究,120 名参与者,95%CI 0.44,1.19)以及增加足底面积(3 项研究,134 名参与者,95%CI 0.04,0.74)。从中等确定性证据来看,肩前突(5 项研究,176 名参与者,95%CI -0.11,0.61)、肩部在额状面的对齐(3 项研究,160 名参与者,95%CI -0.15,0.52)、脊柱侧凸(2 项研究,26 名参与者,95%CI -1.57,2.19)和骨盆前旋(5 项研究,233 名参与者,95%CI -0.02,0.51)均无显著影响。从中低确定性证据来看,MT 对肩胛上旋(2 项研究,74 名参与者,95%CI -0.76,2.17)无影响。从中低至极低确定性证据来看,在短期或中期内,MT 并不优于其他干预措施来改善前伸头姿势(5 项研究,170 名参与者,95%CI -1.39,0.67)和肩前突(3 项研究,94 名参与者,95%CI -4.04,0.97)。

意义

MT 可推荐用于改善短期和中期的前伸头姿势、胸曲和骨盆排列,但不能改善肩部姿势和脊柱侧凸。MT 会降低足底拱的高度,这在物理治疗计划中必须加以考虑。PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42021244423。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验