Holoyda Brian James
Martinez Detention Facility, Martinez, CA 94553, USA.
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jun 12;12(12):1525. doi: 10.3390/ani12121525.
Societies have proscribed bestiality, or sex between humans and nonhuman animals, since the earliest recorded legal codes. In the early American colonies, religious prohibitions against bestiality provided the grounds for punishing those who engaged in such acts. In the 1800's, Henry Bergh imported the animal welfare approach to the United States, which modernized the legislative treatment of animals in the country. Until recently, however, many laws in the U.S. have been outdated and vague and have utilized moralistic terminology. Since the 1960's, a growing body of literature has developed suggesting that individuals who harm animals may also interpersonally offend. This concept, known as the Link, has served as a major motivation for advocates to promote new legislation criminalizing bestiality, to modernize old state statutes, and to expand penalties for individuals convicted of having sex with animals. Unfortunately, data supporting the Link between bestiality and interpersonal violence are limited and of questionable generalizability to the broad public. The Link's weaknesses can assist in guiding further research. This article summarizes the history of bestiality law, the current state of bestiality legislation in the United States, the body of Link-related literature on bestiality and interpersonal violence and other problematic sexual behaviors, and the empirical weaknesses and needs revealed by this legislation.
自最早有记录的法典以来,社会就一直禁止兽奸行为,即人类与非人类动物之间的性行为。在美国早期殖民地,宗教对兽奸行为的禁令为惩罚从事此类行为的人提供了依据。19世纪,亨利·伯格将动物福利理念引入美国,使该国对动物的立法处理方式得以现代化。然而,直到最近,美国的许多法律都已过时且含糊不清,还使用了道德主义的术语。自20世纪60年代以来,越来越多的文献表明,伤害动物的人可能在人际方面也有冒犯行为。这一概念,即所谓的“关联”,成为倡导者推动新立法将兽奸行为定为犯罪、使旧的州法规现代化以及扩大对与动物发生性行为的定罪者处罚的主要动机。不幸的是,支持兽奸行为与人际暴力之间“关联”的数据有限,且对广大公众的普遍适用性存疑。“关联”的弱点有助于指导进一步的研究。本文总结了兽奸法的历史、美国兽奸立法的现状、关于兽奸行为与人际暴力及其他有问题性行为的“关联”相关文献,以及该立法所揭示的实证弱点和需求。