Suppr超能文献

甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑联合棘白菌素作为肺孢子菌肺炎一线治疗方案的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Efficacy of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole in Combination with an Echinocandin as a First-Line Treatment Option for Pneumocystis Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Kato Hideo, Hagihara Mao, Asai Nobuhiro, Umemura Takumi, Shibata Yuichi, Hirai Jun, Yamagishi Yuka, Iwamoto Takuya, Mikamo Hiroshige

机构信息

Department of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute 480-1195, Japan.

Department of Pharmacy, Mie University Hospital, Tsu 514-8507, Japan.

出版信息

Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 May 26;11(6):719. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11060719.

Abstract

Although combination therapy using trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) plus echinocandins has been reported to reduce the mortality of patients with pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP), it remains unclear whether it is more effective than TMP-SMX monotherapy, the current first-line treatment for this disease. Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacies of these treatment options for PCP. The Scopus, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, and Ichushi databases were searched for studies (up to January 2022) reporting the mortality and positive response rates (fewer clinical symptoms, improved partial pressure of arterial oxygen, and resolution of pneumonitis on chest imaging) of PCP patients receiving monotherapy or combination therapy. Four studies met the inclusion criteria. All four presented mortality data and one had positive response rates. Compared with the monotherapy, the combination therapy resulted in significantly lower mortality and higher positive response rates (mortality: odds ratio (OR) 2.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.46-3.31; positive response rate: OR 2.13, 95%CI 1.41-3.23), suggesting it to be an effective and promising first-line therapy for PCP. However, further safety evaluations are needed to establish this as a fact.

摘要

虽然有报道称,使用甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)加棘白菌素的联合疗法可降低肺孢子菌肺炎(PCP)患者的死亡率,但目前尚不清楚该联合疗法是否比TMP-SMX单一疗法(该病的一线治疗方法)更有效。因此,我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较这些治疗方案对PCP的疗效。我们检索了Scopus、EMBASE、PubMed、CINAHL和Ichushi数据库,查找报告接受单一疗法或联合疗法的PCP患者死亡率和阳性反应率(临床症状减轻、动脉血氧分压改善以及胸部影像学显示肺炎消散)的研究(截至2022年1月)。四项研究符合纳入标准。所有四项研究均提供了死亡率数据,其中一项有阳性反应率数据。与单一疗法相比,联合疗法导致死亡率显著降低,阳性反应率更高(死亡率:比值比(OR)2.20,95%置信区间(CI)1.46 - 3.31;阳性反应率:OR 2.13,95%CI 1.41 - 3.23),表明它是一种有效且有前景的PCP一线治疗方法。然而,需要进一步的安全性评估来证实这一点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fce/9220274/ecdf8d7da272/antibiotics-11-00719-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验