Noventa Marco, Spagnol Giulia, Marchetti Matteo, Saccardi Carlo, Bonaldo Giulio, Laganà Antonio Simone, Cavallin Francesco, Andrisani Alessandra, Ambrosini Guido, Vitale Salvatore Giovanni, Pacheco Luis Alonso, Haimovich Sergio, Di Spiezio Sardo Attilio, Carugno Jose, Scioscia Marco, Garzon Simone, Bettocchi Stefano, Buzzaccarini Giovanni, Tozzi Roberto, Vitagliano Amerigo
Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Women and Children's Health, University of Padua, 35100 Padua, Italy.
Unit of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialities (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 8;11(12):3290. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123290.
Objective: we performed a systematic review/meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of septate uterus and hysteroscopic metroplasty on pregnancy rate-(PR), live birth rate-(LBR), spontaneous abortion-(SA) and preterm labor (PL) in infertile/recurrent miscarriage-(RM) patients. Data sources: a literature search of relevant papers was conducted using electronic bibliographic databases (Medline, Scopus, Embase, Science direct). Study eligibility criteria: we included in this meta-analysis all types of observational studies that evaluated the clinical impact of the uterine septum and its resection (hysteroscopic metroplasty) on reproductive and obstetrics outcomes. The population included were patients with a diagnosis of infertility or recurrent pregnancy loss. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: outcomes were evaluated according to three subgroups: (i) Women with untreated uterine septum versus women without septum (controls); (ii) Women with treated uterine septum versus women with untreated septum (controls); (iii) Women before and after septum removal. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the outcome measures. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the depth of the septum. Sources of heterogeneity were explored by meta-regression analysis according to specific features: assisted reproductive technology/spontaneous conception, study design and quality of papers included Results: data from 38 studies were extracted. (i) septum versus no septum: a lower PR and LBR were associated with septate uterus vs. controls (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.27−0.76; p < 0.0001; and OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.12−0.39; p < 0.0001); a higher proportion of SA and PL was associated with septate uterus vs. controls (OR 4.29, 95% CI 2.90−6.36; p < 0.0001; OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.52−4.31; p = 0.0004). (ii) treated versus untreated septum: PR and PL were not different in removed vs. unremoved septum(OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.49−2.49; p = 0.82 and OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.35−1.86; p = 0.62); a lower proportion of SA was associated with removed vs. unremoved septum (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.21−1.04; p = 0.001); (iii) before-after septum removal: the proportion of LBR was higher after the removal of septum (OR 49.58, 95% CI 29.93−82.13; p < 0.0001) and the proportion of SA and PL was lower after the removal of the septum (OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.02−0.04; p < 0.000 and OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.03−0.08; p < 0.0001) Conclusions: the results show the detrimental effect of the uterine septum on PR, LBR, SA and PL. Its treatment reduces the rate of SA.
我们进行了一项系统评价/荟萃分析,以评估子宫纵隔及宫腔镜子宫成形术对不孕/复发性流产(RM)患者妊娠率(PR)、活产率(LBR)、自然流产(SA)和早产(PL)的影响。
使用电子文献数据库(Medline、Scopus、Embase、Science direct)对相关论文进行文献检索。
我们将所有评估子宫纵隔及其切除术(宫腔镜子宫成形术)对生殖和产科结局临床影响的各类观察性研究纳入本荟萃分析。纳入人群为诊断为不孕或复发性妊娠丢失的患者。
根据三个亚组评估结局:(i)未治疗子宫纵隔的女性与无纵隔的女性(对照组);(ii)治疗子宫纵隔的女性与未治疗纵隔的女性(对照组);(iii)子宫纵隔切除前后的女性。计算结局指标的比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)。p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。根据纵隔深度进行亚组分析。根据特定特征通过Meta回归分析探索异质性来源:辅助生殖技术/自然受孕、研究设计及纳入论文的质量。
提取了38项研究的数据。(i)纵隔与无纵隔:与对照组相比,子宫纵隔患者的PR和LBR较低(OR 0.45,95%CI 0.27−0.76;p<0.0001;OR 0.21,95%CI 0.12−0.39;p<0.0001);与对照组相比,子宫纵隔患者的SA和PL比例较高(OR 4.29,95%CI 2.90−6.36;p<0.0001;OR 2.56,95%CI 1.52−4.31;p = 0.0004)。(ii)治疗与未治疗纵隔:切除纵隔与未切除纵隔的PR和PL无差异(OR 1.10,95%CI 0.49−2.49;p = 0.82;OR 0.81,95%CI 0.35−1.86;p = 0.62);与未切除纵隔相比,切除纵隔的SA比例较低(OR 0.47,95%CI 0.21−1.04;p = 0.001);(iii)子宫纵隔切除前后:切除纵隔后LBR比例较高(OR 49.58,95%CI 29.93−82.13;p<0.0001),切除纵隔后SA和PL比例较低(OR 0.02,95%CI 0.02−0.04;p<0.000;OR 0.05,95%CI 0.03−0.08;p<0.0001)
结果显示子宫纵隔对PR、LBR、SA和PL有不良影响。其治疗可降低SA发生率。