Suppr超能文献

体外测试回路中轴流和离心式左心室辅助装置血液相容性的比较。

Comparison of the Hemocompatibility of an Axial and a Centrifugal Left Ventricular Assist Device in an In Vitro Test Circuit.

作者信息

Borchers Patrick, Winnersbach Patrick, Kraemer Sandra, Beckers Christian, Buhl Eva Miriam, Leonhardt Steffen, Rossaint Rolf, Walter Marian, Breuer Thomas, Bleilevens Christian

机构信息

Medical Information Technology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 20, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 15;11(12):3431. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123431.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hemocompatibility of left ventricular assist devices is essential for preventing adverse events. In this study, we compared the hemocompatibility of an axial-flow (Sputnik) to a centrifugal-flow (HeartMate 3) pump.

METHODS

Both pumps were integrated into identical in vitro test circuits, each filled with 75 mL heparinized human blood of the same donor. During each experiment (n = 7), the pumps were operated with equal flow for six hours. Blood sampling and analysis were performed on a regular schedule. The analytes were indicators of hemolysis, coagulation activation, platelet count and activation, as well as extracellular vesicles.

RESULTS

Sputnik induced higher hemolysis compared to the HeartMate 3 after 360 min. Furthermore, platelet activation was higher for Sputnik after 120 min onward. In the HeartMate 3 circuit, the platelet count was reduced within the first hour. Furthermore, Sputnik triggered a more pronounced increase in extracellular vesicles, a potential trigger for adverse events in left ventricular assist device application. Activation of coagulation showed a time-dependent increase, with no differences between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This experimental study confirms the hypothesis that axial-flow pumps may induce stronger hemolysis compared to centrifugal pumps, coming along with larger amounts of circulating extracellular vesicles and a stronger PLT activation.

摘要

背景

左心室辅助装置的血液相容性对于预防不良事件至关重要。在本研究中,我们比较了轴流泵(Sputnik)和离心流泵(HeartMate 3)的血液相容性。

方法

将两种泵都集成到相同的体外测试回路中,每个回路都装有来自同一供体的75毫升肝素化人血。在每个实验(n = 7)中,泵以相同流量运行6小时。定期进行血液采样和分析。分析物包括溶血、凝血激活、血小板计数和激活以及细胞外囊泡的指标。

结果

360分钟后,Sputnik诱导的溶血比HeartMate 3更高。此外,120分钟后Sputnik的血小板激活更高。在HeartMate 3回路中,血小板计数在第一小时内就降低了。此外,Sputnik引发细胞外囊泡更明显的增加,这是左心室辅助装置应用中不良事件的潜在触发因素。凝血激活呈时间依赖性增加,两组之间无差异。

结论

本实验研究证实了以下假设:与离心泵相比,轴流泵可能诱导更强的溶血,同时伴有大量循环细胞外囊泡和更强的血小板激活。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/918e/9225365/76f8309fea42/jcm-11-03431-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验