• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种机器学习算法在预测门诊内侧髌股韧带重建术后意外过夜住院风险方面优于传统多元回归。

A Machine Learning Algorithm Outperforms Traditional Multiple Regression to Predict Risk of Unplanned Overnight Stay Following Outpatient Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.

作者信息

Ezuma Chimere O, Lu Yining, Pareek Ayoosh, Wilbur Ryan, Krych Aaron J, Forsythe Brian, Camp Christopher L

机构信息

School of Medicine, Vagelos Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, and Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 May 24;4(3):e1103-e1110. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.03.009. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.asmr.2022.03.009
PMID:35747652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9210490/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether conventional logistic regression or machine learning algorithms were more precise in identifying the risk factors for unplanned overnight admission after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the prospectively collected National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was performed to identify patients who underwent outpatient MPFL reconstruction from 2006-2018. Patients admitted overnight were identified as those with length of stay of 1 or more days. Models were generated using random forest, extreme gradient boosting, adaptive boosting, or elastic net penalized logistic regression, and an additional model was produced as a weighted ensemble of the 4 final algorithms. The predictive capacity of these models was compared to that of logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 1307 patients identified, 221 (16.9%) required at least one overnight stay after MPFL reconstruction. Multivariate logistic regression found the following variables to be predictors of inpatient admission: age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.03 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.02-1.04]; <.001), spinal anesthesia (OR = 3.42 [95% CI 1.98-6.08]; < .001), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 3/4 (OR = 1.96 [95% CI 1.25-3.06]; < .001), history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR = 6.44 [95% CI 1.58-26.17];  = .02), and body mass index (BMI) (OR = 1.03 [95% CI 1.01-1.05]; < .001). The ensemble model achieved the best performance based on discrimination assessed via internal validation (area under the curve = 0.722). The variables determined most important by the ensemble model were increasing BMI, increasing age, ASA class, anesthesia, smoking, hypertension, lateral release, and history of COPD.

CONCLUSIONS

An internally validated machine learning algorithm outperformed logistic regression modeling in predicting the need for unplanned overnight hospitalization after MPFL reconstruction. In this model, the most significant risk factors for admission were age, BMI, ASA class, smoking status, hypertension, lateral release, and history of COPD. This tool can be deployed to augment provider assessment to identify high-risk candidates and appropriately set postoperative expectations for patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Identifying and mitigating patient risk factors to prevent adverse surgical outcomes and hospitalizations is one of our primary goals. There may be a key role for machine learning algorithms to help successfully and efficiently risk stratify patients to decrease costs, appropriately set postoperative expectations, and increase the quality of delivered care.

摘要

目的

确定传统逻辑回归或机器学习算法在识别髌股内侧韧带(MPFL)重建术后非计划过夜住院风险因素方面是否更精确。

方法

对前瞻性收集的国家外科质量改进计划数据库进行回顾性分析,以识别2006年至2018年接受门诊MPFL重建的患者。过夜住院的患者被定义为住院时间为1天或更长时间的患者。使用随机森林、极端梯度提升、自适应提升或弹性网惩罚逻辑回归生成模型,并将4种最终算法的加权集成作为附加模型。将这些模型的预测能力与逻辑回归的预测能力进行比较。

结果

在1307名确定的患者中,221名(16.9%)在MPFL重建后需要至少一次过夜住院。多变量逻辑回归发现以下变量是住院的预测因素:年龄(比值比[OR]=1.03[95%置信区间{CI}1.02 - 1.04];P<.001)、脊髓麻醉(OR = 3.42[95%CI 1.98 - 6.08];P<.001)、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)3/4级(OR = 1.96[95%CI 1.25 - 3.06];P<.001)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)病史(OR = 6.44[95%CI 1.58 - 26.17];P = .02)和体重指数(BMI)(OR = 1.03[95%CI 1.01 - 1.05];P<.001)。基于通过内部验证评估的辨别力,集成模型表现最佳(曲线下面积 = 0.722)。集成模型确定的最重要变量是BMI增加、年龄增加、ASA分级、麻醉、吸烟、高血压、外侧松解和COPD病史。

结论

在预测MPFL重建术后非计划过夜住院需求方面,经过内部验证的机器学习算法优于逻辑回归建模。在该模型中,住院的最显著风险因素是年龄、BMI、ASA分级、吸烟状况、高血压、外侧松解和COPD病史。该工具可用于增强医疗服务提供者的评估,以识别高危患者并为患者适当地设定术后预期。

临床意义

识别和减轻患者风险因素以预防不良手术结果和住院是我们的主要目标之一。机器学习算法可能在帮助成功且高效地对患者进行风险分层以降低成本、适当地设定术后预期并提高所提供护理的质量方面发挥关键作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbb9/9210490/5fcc2d7e8972/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbb9/9210490/ab64bb2909c0/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbb9/9210490/608cb3689d8a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbb9/9210490/c54838c8c36c/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbb9/9210490/5fcc2d7e8972/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbb9/9210490/ab64bb2909c0/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbb9/9210490/608cb3689d8a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbb9/9210490/c54838c8c36c/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbb9/9210490/5fcc2d7e8972/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
A Machine Learning Algorithm Outperforms Traditional Multiple Regression to Predict Risk of Unplanned Overnight Stay Following Outpatient Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.一种机器学习算法在预测门诊内侧髌股韧带重建术后意外过夜住院风险方面优于传统多元回归。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 May 24;4(3):e1103-e1110. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.03.009. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Machine learning can reliably identify patients at risk of overnight hospital admission following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.机器学习可以可靠地识别出前交叉韧带重建术后有夜间住院风险的患者。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Sep;29(9):2958-2966. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06321-w. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
3
Machine Learning Model Identifies Increased Operative Time and Greater BMI as Predictors for Overnight Admission After Outpatient Hip Arthroscopy.机器学习模型确定手术时间延长和较高的体重指数是门诊髋关节镜检查后过夜住院的预测因素。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Nov 12;3(6):e1981-e1990. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.10.001. eCollection 2021 Dec.
4
Health and Socioeconomic Risk Factors for Unplanned Hospitalization Following Ambulatory Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Development of a Patient Selection Tool Using Machine Learning.术后门诊单间膝关节置换术后非计划性住院的健康和社会经济风险因素:使用机器学习开发患者选择工具。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Oct;38(10):1982-1989. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.026. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
5
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
6
Machine Learning Can Accurately Predict Overnight Stay, Readmission, and 30-Day Complications Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.机器学习可以准确预测前交叉韧带重建术后的住院过夜时间、再入院率和 30 天并发症。
Arthroscopy. 2023 Mar;39(3):777-786.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.06.032. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
7
Predictors of 30-Day Mortality Among Dutch Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery, 2011-2016.2011-2016 年荷兰结直肠癌手术患者 30 天死亡率的预测因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e217737. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7737.
8
Risk stratification of patients undergoing outpatient lumbar decompression surgery.门诊腰椎减压手术患者的风险分层。
Spine J. 2023 May;23(5):675-684. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
9
Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Clinically Meaningful Improvement After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.应用机器学习算法预测关节镜下前交叉韧带重建术后具有临床意义的改善情况。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Oct 14;9(10):23259671211046575. doi: 10.1177/23259671211046575. eCollection 2021 Oct.
10
Length of hospital stay after craniotomy for tumor: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.肿瘤开颅术后的住院时间:一项国家外科质量改进计划分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Dec;39(6):E12. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.FOCUS15386.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic performance of deep learning for leg length measurements on radiographs in leg length discrepancy: A systematic review.深度学习在下肢长度不等的X线片上测量腿长的诊断性能:一项系统评价。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Nov 10;11(4):e70080. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70080. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Application of Machine Learning in Predicting Perioperative Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: A Narrative Review for Clinicians.机器学习在预测癌症患者围手术期结局中的应用:临床医生的叙述性综述。
Curr Oncol. 2024 May 11;31(5):2727-2747. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31050207.
3
Prediction of Complications and Prognostication in Perioperative Medicine: A Systematic Review and PROBAST Assessment of Machine Learning Tools.

本文引用的文献

1
Lateral retinacular release combined with MPFL reconstruction for patellofemoral instability: a systematic review.外侧支持带松解联合 MPFL 重建治疗髌股关节不稳定:系统评价。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Feb;141(2):283-292. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03689-9. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
2
Machine learning can reliably identify patients at risk of overnight hospital admission following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.机器学习可以可靠地识别出前交叉韧带重建术后有夜间住院风险的患者。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Sep;29(9):2958-2966. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06321-w. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
3
Time Trends and Risk Factors for 30-Day Adverse Events in Black Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.
围手术期医学并发症预测和预后评估:机器学习工具的系统评价和 PROBAST 评估。
Anesthesiology. 2024 Jan 1;140(1):85-101. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004764.
4
A Mental Health Management and Cognitive Behavior Analysis Model of College Students Using Multi-View Clustering Analysis Algorithm.基于多视图聚类分析算法的大学生心理健康管理与认知行为分析模型。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Sep 27;2022:2813473. doi: 10.1155/2022/2813473. eCollection 2022.
黑人患者初次全膝关节置换术后 30 天内不良事件的时间趋势和危险因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Nov;35(11):3145-3149. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.013. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
4
Artificial Intelligence and Orthopaedics: An Introduction for Clinicians.人工智能与骨科学:临床医师入门。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 May 6;102(9):830-840. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01128.
5
Payments for outpatient joint replacement surgery: A comparison of hospital outpatient departments and ambulatory surgery centers.门诊关节置换手术的支付方式:医院门诊部门与日间手术中心的比较。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr;55(2):218-223. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13262. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
6
The SIFK score: a validated predictive model for arthroplasty progression after subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee.SIFK 评分:一种经过验证的膝关节软骨下不足骨折后关节置换进展的预测模型。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Oct;28(10):3149-3155. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05792-w. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
7
Outpatient total hip or knee arthroplasty in ambulatory surgery center versus arthroplasty ward: a randomized controlled trial.门诊全髋关节或膝关节置换术在日间手术中心与关节置换病房的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Feb;91(1):42-47. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1686205. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
8
Patient Outcomes Following Total Joint Replacement Surgery: A Comparison of Hospitals and Ambulatory Surgery Centers.全关节置换手术后的患者结局:医院和日间手术中心的比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jan;35(1):7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.041. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
9
Development of Machine Learning Algorithms for Prediction of Sustained Postoperative Opioid Prescriptions After Total Hip Arthroplasty.机器学习算法在全髋关节置换术后持续阿片类药物处方预测中的开发。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Oct;34(10):2272-2277.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
10
Age at Time of Surgery but Not Sex Is Related to Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.手术时的年龄而非性别与内侧髌股韧带重建后的结果相关。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jun;47(7):1638-1644. doi: 10.1177/0363546519841371. Epub 2019 May 7.