Padaki Ajay S, Ma Gabrielle C, Truong Nicole M, Cogan Charles J, Lansdown Drew A, Feeley Brian T, Ma C Benjamin, Zhang Alan L
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 May 27;4(3):e1167-e1178. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.014. eCollection 2022 Jun.
To compare the incidence, patient demographics, complication rates, readmission rates, and reoperation rates of open and arthroscopic surgery performed for septic arthritis in native knee and shoulder joints.
Records of patients who were diagnosed with native knee or shoulder septic arthritis and underwent open or arthroscopic irrigation and debridement (I&D) between 2015 and 2018 were queried from the PearlDiver Mariner Database. International Classification of Diseases 10th (ICD-10) diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify patients and track reoperations. Reoperation procedures, including revision open and arthroscopic I&D, were analyzed at 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years. Complications, emergency department (ED) admissions, and hospital readmissions within 30 days were analyzed and compared between the open and arthroscopic cohorts.
The query resulted with 1,993 patients who underwent knee I&D (75.3% arthroscopic, 24.7% open, < .001) and 476 patients who underwent shoulder I&D (64.8% arthroscopic, 35.2% open, < .001). One-month complication rates (11.6-22.7%) and hospital readmission rates (15.8-19.6%) were similar for arthroscopic and open treatment for knee and shoulder septic arthritis. Reoperation rates for revision I&D of the knee were higher after open compared to arthroscopic treatment at 1 month, 1 and 2 years (20.9% vs. 16.7%, 32.5% vs 27.6% and 34.1% vs. 29.4%, < .05, respectively). For shoulder septic arthritis 1-month, 1-year, and 2-year reoperation rates were similar for open and arthroscopic treatment (16.0% vs 11.7%, 22.0% vs 19.3%, and 22.7% vs 20.0%, = .57, respectively). Lastly, 6.7% of patients with native septic knee arthritis underwent subsequent arthroplasty by 2 years.
Arthroscopic treatment carries a lower reoperation rate than open surgery for knee septic arthritis, but in the shoulder, the risk for revision I&D is similar after arthroscopic or open surgery.
比较在天然膝关节和肩关节中进行的开放性手术与关节镜手术治疗化脓性关节炎的发病率、患者人口统计学特征、并发症发生率、再入院率和再次手术率。
从PearlDiver Mariner数据库中查询2015年至2018年间被诊断为天然膝关节或肩关节化脓性关节炎并接受开放性或关节镜下冲洗清创术(I&D)的患者记录。使用国际疾病分类第10版(ICD-10)诊断和手术编码来识别患者并跟踪再次手术情况。对包括翻修开放性和关节镜下I&D在内的再次手术程序在1个月、1年和2年时进行分析。对开放性和关节镜手术队列之间30天内的并发症、急诊科(ED)就诊情况和医院再入院情况进行分析和比较。
查询结果显示,1993例患者接受了膝关节I&D(75.3%为关节镜手术,24.7%为开放性手术,P<0.001),476例患者接受了肩关节I&D(64.8%为关节镜手术,35.2%为开放性手术,P<0.001)。膝关节和肩关节化脓性关节炎的关节镜手术和开放性手术在1个月时的并发症发生率(11.6%-22.7%)和医院再入院率(15.8%-19.6%)相似。膝关节翻修I&D的再次手术率在开放性手术后1个月、1年和2年时高于关节镜手术(分别为20.9%对16.7%、32.5%对27.6%和34.1%对29.4%,P<0.05)。对于肩关节化脓性关节炎,开放性手术和关节镜手术在1个月、1年和2年时的再次手术率相似(分别为16.0%对11.7%、22.0%对19.3%和22.7%对20.0%,P = 0.57)。最后,6.7%的天然膝关节化脓性关节炎患者在2年内接受了后续关节成形术。
对于膝关节化脓性关节炎,关节镜手术的再次手术率低于开放性手术,但对于肩关节,关节镜手术或开放性手术后翻修I&D的风险相似。